Started By
Message

Florida's New Recruiting Method to Get Around the FA Agreement Problems
Posted on 12/18/15 at 8:00 am
Posted on 12/18/15 at 8:00 am
https://www.seccountry.com/florida/floridas-new-recruiting-strategy-eliminates-need-for-financial-aid-agreements
This is pretty sneaky, jealous that we didn't think of it first.
A little surprised Butch Jones didn't think of this first.
This is pretty sneaky, jealous that we didn't think of it first.

quote:
Florida’s new recruiting strategy eliminates need for financial aid agreements
quote:
The Gators signed wide receiver Isaiah Johnson and seven other mid-year recruits to written offers of admission instead of financial aid agreements.
With this method, Johnson’s recent decision to de-commit will not result in NCAA sanctions for UF, as it did with LSU in February.
As discovered by Florida’s compliance office, the NCAA’s Michelle Hosick explained to SEC Country that if a recruit signs only a written offer of admission and not a financial aid agreement, a school is not in violation of NCAA rules should that recruit decide to enroll elsewhere.
But when a financial aid agreement alone is signed and its benefits are acted upon, the school has committed a recruiting violation if that mid-year signee fails to enroll. This happened to LSU with offensive lineman Matt Womack during the 2015 cycle.
quote:
Both provide the same benefits, among others, to the school and mid-year enrollee:
- Dead periods no longer apply after a financial aid agreement, written offer of admission or letter of intent has been signed.
- Phone calls restrictions are lifted.
- Publicity restrictions lifted.
- Changes allowable timing for official and unofficial visits.
- Coaches still can’t make in-person, off-campus contact between the April 15-May 31 evaluation period, even if one of the three documents has been signed.
The biggest — and essentially the only — difference between a financial aid agreement and written offer of admission is that one can lead to an NCAA violation and the other can’t.
A little surprised Butch Jones didn't think of this first.
This post was edited on 12/18/15 at 8:01 am
Posted on 12/18/15 at 8:02 am to CockInYourEar
I see no issue with this. It's a good way to protect yourself from being screwed by poorly written rules.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 8:22 am to ProjectP2294
Very smart. I thought LSU got screwed over when they got penalized for the commit choosing Bama in the end. Schools should protect themselves..
Posted on 12/18/15 at 8:29 am to jangalang
The ruling against LSU was bullshite.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 9:20 am to CockInYourEar
You are surprised that TN and their administration didn't figure this out?
Obviously I'm not surprised at all that Foley and UFs admin were a step ahead of the game.

Obviously I'm not surprised at all that Foley and UFs admin were a step ahead of the game.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 9:34 am to BloodSweat&Beers
The ruling against LSU was bullshite.
Yup
Yup
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:54 am to SoFla Tideroller
Kudos to the guy who thought of this.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:07 pm to CockInYourEar
From an institution known primarily for utter BS, holding LSU accountable for a committed 18 year old's decision to attend another school set's a new standard. It's really an impressive feat if you think about it.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 3:45 pm to gatordmb89
We did figure out blue and fray shirts to sign back to back 30+ classes. Which according to trant makes us terrible human beings
Back to top
