Started By
Message

re: 5 star PG Ashton Hagans decommits from UGA

Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:


I'm not sure there is more depth at guard at UK. At least not proven anyways.


Before Hagans' commitement, you don't even need to include this line. Assuming SGA/HD go pro, UK had only 3 guards who are not elite .

Auburn is returning two upperclassmenm, All SEC guards, another two players who averaged 10+ ppg as FR and a senior who got about 10-15mpg last season


This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 2:21 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42506 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Auburn is returning two upperclassmenm, All SEC guards, another two players who averaged 10+ ppg as FR and a senior who got about 10-15mpg last season


Before Hagans' commitment, UK only had 3 guards total expected for next season. They were a backup (Green), their worst recruit last year (Baker) and an overrated FR in Hero



Right. That's what I was trying to say. UK may have more depth if you look solely at recruiting rankings, but Auburn's guards have clearly done more at the collegiate level and don't look to easily be displaced.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

UK may have more depth if you look solely at recruiting rankings


They only had 3 guards expected before Hagans committed. They had absolutely no depth


Auburn not only has better guards like you alluded to, Auburn has more guards and players fighting for minutes
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 2:25 pm
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
19303 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:35 pm to
5 guards before Hagans committed, UK is really deep at the guard position. Herro, Quickley, Green, Johnson and Baker are all expected to get some decent minutes next year. Hagans just adds to that.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

They only had 3 guards expected before Hagans committed. They had absolutely no depth


Lulz, you have no idea what your talking about.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42506 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

They only had 3 guards expected before Hagans committed. They had absolutely no depth


They'll have at least 5 guards who were ranked in the top 50 on their roster next year.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Lulz, you have no idea what your talking about.



Sorry, I forgot Quickley who makes 4 guards. I consider Johnson as a SF though

Considering none of those 5 would start at AU next season, Hagans is smart to take his chances with UKs limited depth. Probably wouldn't even be first off the bench either




This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 4:19 pm
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 4:14 pm to
quote:


They'll have at least 5 guards who were ranked in the top 50 on their roster next year.



I considered Johnson a SF and Baker isn't top 50

Forgot about Quickley
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 4:14 pm
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
19303 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 4:25 pm to
It's the "limited" part that's not accurate. We're going to have 6 guards(Johnson is a SG) vying for 2-3 spots most times. We are very deep and very talented at that position.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Considering none of those 5 would start at AU next season, Hagans is smart to take his chances with UKs limited depth. Probably wouldn't even be first off the bench either


Now your just trolling.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Now your just trolling.


If you are seriously suggesting that these players would start over returning all conference guards from the SEC Champ you clearly are trolling.




Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

If you are seriously suggesting that these players would start over returning all conference guards from the SEC Champ you clearly are trolling.


Nope, you’re trolling. And yes, several of the guards would start for Auburn.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Nope, you’re trolling. And yes, several of the guards would start for Auburn.



You must be the rare UK fan who doesn't know shite about college basketball.

It's also impressive how you appear to be upvotibg all your own posts
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 6:17 pm
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 6:22 pm to
Seems you are the Auburn fan that does not know shite about Auburn. And I am only down voting your trolling arse.
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 6:23 pm
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 7:30 pm to
quote:


Seems you are the Auburn fan that does not know shite about Auburn.


What exactly do I not know about Auburn basketball?

Who exactly do you think would start over Harper/Brown? Right now you are entering LSU basketball fan naivety by pushing this idea


Hagans, Green and Quickley aren't better PGs than Harper

Johnson and Baker + those above aren't better SG options than Bryce Brown who made the Naismith Final 30 list
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 8:47 pm to
So we are clear on here...your saying Hagans had no interest with Auburn because he was scared of not getting any playing time? Your on the record with that hot take?
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 8:51 pm
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

your saying Hagans had no interest with Auburn because he was scared on not getting any playing time?


I'm saying the reclassification was the nail in the coffin. We were fading post FBI scandal even with play time to offer. Take that play time away and we were down for the count. If Hagans stayed in the 2019 class, we'd still be in fringe contention but doubtful. If there was no FBI case we'd be in the thick of it



Btw, EJ Montgomery was not a FBI casualty. He is a "his sister accused a WBB coach of assault and AU did nothing about it" casualty
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 8:55 pm
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13454 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 10:42 pm to
UK is loaded now. Looked for a second there like Cal had lost his touch a bit but he's back.
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13454 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

I think we underachieved. I certainly don't think we massively underachieved.

8-10 was massively underachieving imo.
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13454 posts
Posted on 4/10/18 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

What exactly do I not know about Auburn basketball?

Who exactly do you think would start over Harper/Brown? Right now you are entering LSU basketball fan naivety by pushing this idea


Hagans, Green and Quickley aren't better PGs than Harper

Johnson and Baker + those above aren't better SG options than Bryce Brown who made the Naismith Final 30 list

Hagans is better than Harper imo. You may disagree, which is fair, but it's not nearly as clear-cut as you think. Hagans is an elite prospect and Harper certainly isn't without his weaknesses.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter