Started By
Message
re: 2016 Five Star QB Shea Patterson -- Calvary Baptist (Shreveport, LA)
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:12 pm to BallstotheWesleyWall
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:12 pm to BallstotheWesleyWall
Complaining about grammar is slang for "I have no idea what the frick I can say to counter those unfortunate stats that blow my comments out of the water."
Have a nice day.
Have a nice day.
1
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:15 pm to TimTheTiger
No, it's slang for "Don't call someone stupid when you can't even formulate a fricking sentence."
Have a terrible day.
Have a terrible day.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:22 pm to geauxrebs
quote:
however from what I've been hearing, Ole Miss is trending as the team to beat for Shea.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:23 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:32 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
What's funny about your post is you call him stupid for not knowing what even or almost means and then you prove how stupid you are by positing historical stats when he used a 7 year timeframe.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:38 pm to geauxrebs
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 1/20/15 at 2:55 pm to UMRealist
omgggg ole piss fans our so dum
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:13 pm to constant cough
quote:
quote:
however from what I've been hearing, Ole Miss is trending as the team to beat for Shea.
Several analysts are saying on both sides and the last several CB's have been to Ole Miss.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:36 pm to geauxrebs
The only reason he committed to Arizona was his brother being there, so put 2 and 2 together. He wants to be where his brother is at.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:37 pm to geauxrebs
One of the other major factors that hasn't been discussed yet is the fact that LSU already has a very good QB committed for 2016. Not sure what Ole Miss has.
That's a much easier sell for Ole Miss if they have no other QB committed. This will be a very interesting recruitment.
That's a much easier sell for Ole Miss if they have no other QB committed. This will be a very interesting recruitment.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:41 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
The only reason he committed to Arizona was his brother being there, so put 2 and 2 together. He wants to be where his brother is at.
It's already been said ITT that he's likely to not be a grad assistant there past 2015. If he was set on being with his brother and your theory was right, he would've likely committed to LSU a long time ago.
I've also heard rumblings of Patterson's brother taking a vacant admin spot at Ole Miss, formerly occupied by the current safeties coach.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:44 pm to AdamDeMamp
quote:
One of the other major factors that hasn't been discussed yet is the fact that LSU already has a very good QB committed for 2016. Not sure what Ole Miss has.
Yep. LSU has Feliepe Franks committed right now.
Shea is priority #1 for Ole Miss in the '16 class. Werner and him are pretty tight.
We're also bringing in a wide receiver talent similar to LaQuon Treadwell in 2016 with DK Metcalf, son of former Ole Miss player Terrance Metcalf.
Would make it easier knowing you'll be able to throw to THIS GUY for 2-3 years.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 3:55 pm to AdamDeMamp
quote:
This will be a very interesting recruitment.
It definitely will be. A lot of factors at play in Shea's recruitment.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:06 pm to UMRealist
quote:
What's funny about your post is you call him stupid for not knowing what even or almost means and then you prove how stupid you are by positing historical stats when he used a 7 year timeframe.
Ok, how fricking pitiful is it to use stats from a select time period to lessen the fact how much Ole Miss fricking sucks.
"Yes you guys kick our arse for the most part, but if you only pay attention to certain time frames the arse whoopings don't appear to be as bad"
-Ole Miss fans
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:12 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
We've been more competitive with you than you have with Bama if we're not including certain time frames.
ETA: Wouldn't 25 years be a good barometer or so? It's 15-10 LSU since then. Not like you've absolutely dominated the series or anything. It's actually sad considering how much of an advantage your program has had.
ETA: Wouldn't 25 years be a good barometer or so? It's 15-10 LSU since then. Not like you've absolutely dominated the series or anything. It's actually sad considering how much of an advantage your program has had.
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:19 pm to geauxrebs
quote:
We've been more competitive with you than you have with Bama if we're not including certain time frames.
And there you have it folks when all else fails jump on bama's dick. What bunch of miserable fricks.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:19 pm to geauxrebs
quote:
We've been more competitive with you than you have with Bama if we're not including certain time frames. ETA: Wouldn't 25 years be a good barometer or so? It's 15-10 LSU since then. Not like you've absolutely dominated the series or anything. It's actually sad considering how much of an advantage your program has had.
This post says you truly don't understand LSU/Ole Miss.
I can't help you.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:23 pm to geauxrebs
quote:
geauxrebs
Oh yes the LSU obsession runs deep with this one look at his handle.
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:27 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
LOL. LSU fans getting their jimmies rustled. Nothing new.
Speaking of, I've never seen one fanbase get so worked up over something like
I used the "geaux" because I posted some in TD, and being since this is an LSU-founded board and everything....
Speaking of, I've never seen one fanbase get so worked up over something like
I used the "geaux" because I posted some in TD, and being since this is an LSU-founded board and everything....
This post was edited on 1/20/15 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 1/20/15 at 4:27 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
quote:
Ok, how fricking pitiful is it to use stats from a select time period to lessen the fact how much Ole Miss fricking sucks.
If you meant to ask a question, then the answer probably varies from person to person. In my opinion, the scenario you mentioned sucks less than relying on a more remote time period to support a team's perceived superiority. It also sucks less than applying sweeping generalizations to an entire fanbase.
"Yeah, the head-to-head results for the last decade or so are pretty even, but it's more one-sided if you go back much longer than that. I know that's completely irrelevant today, but I don't care."
- Just one overly upset guy who doesn't speak for the entire LSU fanbase.
Page 3 of 27
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News