Started By
Message
re: Your Heisman Ballot
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:31 pm to spacewrangler
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:31 pm to spacewrangler
Bet you would think it blasphemous to argue Toby Gerhart over Ingram in 2009, huh?
1
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:31 pm to RB10
quote:
The only pathetic person in the thread is you. Trying to claim a a player who's been throughly out-performed by Fournette in every metric, other than all-purpose yards, as better.
Now you're getting butthurt because you're troll is weak shite and getting blown up in your face.
Like I said earlier, find a new schtick.
If I were trolling (which I still wasn't) then I'm not quite sure how getting a sensitive little bitch like you to instigate and rage over literally nothing would be "blowing up in my face". But okay princess. Good luck with your future hissy fits
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:32 pm to MontyFranklyn
Fournette or Boykin. Fournette most likely.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:45 pm to MontyFranklyn
LF
Boykin
Cook
Boykin
Cook
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:46 pm to CRAZY 4 LSU
quote:
Bet you would think it blasphemous to argue Toby Gerhart over Ingram in 2009, huh?
Nope, he was very good that year and was deserving of all the consideration he recieved. MI was voted #1 and that's all that counts.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:47 pm to RB10
No, his other point was that maybe Fournette is less valuable to his team
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:48 pm to The_Joker
quote:
sensitive little bitch like you to instigate and rage over literally nothing would be "blowing up in my face"
You've resorted to name calling because your weak arse argument has been absolutely dismantled.
What's sad is your claiming your not trolling like its good. Now you're just showing your one of the least knowledgeable posters on this board, which is very hard to accomplish. Congrats.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:52 pm to RB10
quote:
I just think it's hilarious some people think McCaffery's 400 more all-purpose yards somehow trump Fournette 7 more TDs. No rational person on the planet would actually believe that.
Stanford is pretty good in the redzone this year. The guy who is scoring touchdowns probably ran for about 21 yards total for seven of his touchdowns.
So yeah, I think a few nice punt returns (for a team like Stanford that historically lacks razzle dazzle) is probably a bigger deal than touchdowns that could be scored by about five of Stanford's tailbacks when they run power.
I think McCaffrey probably benefits to some voters who feel like Gerhart and to some degree Luck got beat at the tape for Heismans.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:57 pm to BGSB
quote:
o, his other point was that maybe Fournette is less valuable to his team
17 touches for 89 yards & 0 total TDs
24 touches for 117 yards & 1 total TD
29 touches for 159 yards & 0 total TDs
A guy with stats like that is not more valuable to his team than LF is to LSU.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 2:59 pm to RB10
Joker....
I've watched LSU a time or two this year and while I don't argue that LF is the main offensive weapon, I will argue that he's not the only offensive weapon. Williams gets some good short yardage touches and goal line calls that are deserved.
Just an overall.... LF has one less game than the rest of the field (yes I know, LSU made the game get canceled) and a home game that was supposed to be an away game (yes I know, LSU caused the flooding in SC).... but I wonder how many full games everyone else has played that he hasn't? He sat out more than one 4th quarter of a game.
I've watched LSU a time or two this year and while I don't argue that LF is the main offensive weapon, I will argue that he's not the only offensive weapon. Williams gets some good short yardage touches and goal line calls that are deserved.
Just an overall.... LF has one less game than the rest of the field (yes I know, LSU made the game get canceled) and a home game that was supposed to be an away game (yes I know, LSU caused the flooding in SC).... but I wonder how many full games everyone else has played that he hasn't? He sat out more than one 4th quarter of a game.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 3:00 pm to RB10
quote:
A guy with stats like that is not more valuable to his team than LF is to LSU.
Oh I know this, Lol. Bama fan showing his objective side
Posted on 10/27/15 at 3:00 pm to oman
quote:
So yeah, I think a few nice punt returns (for a team like Stanford that historically lacks razzle dazzle) is probably a bigger deal than touchdowns that could be scored by about five of Stanford's tailbacks when they run power.
He has 8 punt returns for 22 yards and no TDs on the season. He had one game with 32 yards.
Punt return stats hurt him more than help.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 3:26 pm to RB10
quote:
He has 8 punt returns for 22 yards and no TDs on the season. He had one game with 32 yards.
Punt return stats hurt him more than help.
Kickoff, punts...
He has over 500 yards in kickoff returns.
v. OSU Two kickoff returns for 98 yards, including 67-yarder
v. UCLA 96-yard kickoff return
96-yard kickoff return
Posted on 10/27/15 at 3:52 pm to DocYates
Fournette because I do think he's another Bo. But, Boykin is puttin' up some numbers. Either would be deserving at this point.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 4:05 pm to MontyFranklyn
Brandon Allen.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 4:06 pm to MontyFranklyn
how the frick do you not have boynkin in the top 4? did you grow up under the power lines, boy?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 5:15 pm to MontyFranklyn
1. Watson, Clemson, QB
1. Fournette, LSU, RB
3. McCaffery, RB, Stanford
4. Doctson, WR, TCU
5. Paxton Lynch, Memphis, QB
.
1. Fournette, LSU, RB
3. McCaffery, RB, Stanford
4. Doctson, WR, TCU
5. Paxton Lynch, Memphis, QB
.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News