Started By
Message
re: Wow, Bama oversigns. Who knew?
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:00 am to FlukerFlakes
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:00 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
No it isn't
yes, it is quite different.
quote:
Hell, most golf teams in college will drop you from scholarship if you don't average under a certain score for the year.
So there is a numerical bar set, as opposed to a mythical bar to make room for someone who has not achieved it
quote:
And yet, if your holier than thou approach to anit-oversigning and cutting was genuine you WOULD have a problem with this.
please point out my holier than thou approach. I love it when people try to tell me what I believe in or think quote:
SO STFU
nice, you bring a lot to the table
This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 11:02 am
1
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:04 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Either get better, try your hardest, or start studying more and get an academic scholarship.
Exactly... If a kid on academic scholarship doesn't make the necessary GPA he loses said scholly... Same should go for an athlete... If you don't produce athletically then why should you not lose said Athletic scholly ? Coaches are alway talkin about helping these kids mature into young men and be prepared for the real world... That's the real world... If you don't perform your assigned task and meet your responsibilities , you will be replaced
This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 11:06 am
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:05 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
nice, you bring a lot to the table
I did.
Tell me, if you do not have a holier than thou approach to this then what is your exact problem with it?
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:07 am to reggierayreb
quote:
Exactly... If a kid on academic scholarship doesn't make the necessary GPA he loses said scholly... Same should go for an athlete... If you don't produce athletically then why should you not lose said Athletic scholly ?
the problem is there is no specific bar like any other scholly. sometimes the mythical bar is lowered for a specific player/s in order to make room from one year to the next.
The real problem is the NCAA rules for transfering to other schools when cut
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:09 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
I did. Tell me, if you do not have a holier than thou approach to this then what is your exact problem with it?
no you didnt,
I am still waiting for you to point out exactly my holier than thou approach.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:10 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
The real problem is the NCAA rules for transfering to other schools when cut
You do know this rule applies to all ncaa sports not just football. Even the sports you said "are different". You just have zero clue
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:14 am to FlukerFlakes
You're trying hard for that "Biggest Homer" SECsy, aren't you?
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:14 am to reggierayreb
quote:
Exactly... If a kid on academic scholarship doesn't make the necessary GPA he loses said scholly... Same should go for an athlete... If you don't produce athletically then why should you not lose said Athletic scholly ? Coaches are alway talkin about helping these kids mature into young men and be prepared for the real world... That's the real world... If you don't perform your assigned task and meet your responsibilities , you will be replaced
While I agree with that sentiment, I think that in football in differs a little because "production" is more subjective. A GPA is a set number that a student has a goal to achieve. A scout teamer in football can be just a valuable to a team as a starter sometimes, so you have to have set guidelines for each athlete to meet in order to justify getting the scholarship taken from him. If that is already being done at Bama or anywhere else, and they are holding those athletes accountable; then that would be a level playing field.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:18 am to TTsTowel
quote:
You're trying hard for that "Biggest Homer" SECsy, aren't you?
he is indeed
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:19 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
You do know this rule applies to all ncaa sports not just football. Even the sports you said "are different". You just have zero clue
my god you are a fricking moron. As you said earlier STFU
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:19 am to NYCAuburn
He will probably win it. BuccWild might give him a run at it with his homer recruiting predictions. Maybe I should start sunshine pumping Auburn so I can get in on this.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:21 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
my god you are a fricking moron. As you said earlier
STFU
Explain what the problem you have with oversigning is
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:21 am to TTsTowel
quote:
He will probably win it. BuccWild might give him a run at it with his homer recruiting predictions
Bucc is in the running for biggest "hey look at me" poster
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:23 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Explain what the problem you have with oversigning is
nah, I am done with responding to you. your a dumbass
:IhopeyousawwhatIdidrightthereifnothavemercyonyoursoul:
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:23 am to NYCAuburn
He said that there are "rumors" that Chance Warmack will be the #1 pick in this year's draft. A couple of Alabama fans quickly shot down that claim in an effort to stop the homerism.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:25 am to TTsTowel
quote:
He said that there are "rumors" that Chance Warmack will be the #1 pick in this year's draft
Chance is the #1 player in this draft. Won't be #1 pick at all. But he may go in the top 10, which for a guard is sick.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:25 am to NYCAuburn
It's gonna continue until the NCAA closes up the loophole that "none of the players that are signed on NSD count against the 85 until they enroll in the fall". Even if the "95" were true, as far as the NCAA is concerned, Bama has 70 on scholly as of now...As long as it's legal someone will do it...
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:30 am to bulldawger
Meanwhile UGA goes years unable to sign a full class.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:31 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Chance is the #1 player in this draft. Won't be #1 pick at all. But he may go in the top 10, which for a guard is sick.
No team will "waste" a #1 pick on a Guard. It just ain't happening. The highest Warmack will go is #4.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 11:35 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Has it been stated that we have a few guys in this class that probably won't qualify?
Unfortunately, if that's the case, those players STILL count against the 25-ship per signing year count.
That's precisely why we didn't send Derrick Griffin an LOI.
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News