Started By
Message
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:43 am to djsdawg
quote:
The video shows a player being decleated by a blind side hit. He didn’t see the SC guy and got nailed by him
With his hands....which is legal.

First, the current rule on illegal blindside blocks as written in Rule 12-2-7:
It is a foul if a player initiates a block when his path is toward or parallel to his own end line and makes forcible contact to his opponent with his helmet, forearm, or shoulder.
Note: It is not a foul for a blindside block if the forcible contact occurs in “close-line play†prior to the ball leaving that area. The ball is not considered to have left that area if the player who takes the snap, either from a shotgun position or from under center, retreats in the pocket immediately or with a slight delay, and hands the ball to another player, or runs with the ball himself. This exception does not apply to any action other than a designed play. Any forcible contact in “close-line play†is still subject to the restrictions for crackback and peel back blocks.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:44 am to DawgsLife
Totally a pf
Unless it was a blindside block
Unless you don't agree
Then I'm with you
Unless it was a blindside block
Unless you don't agree
Then I'm with you
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:45 am to DawgsLife
Okay, so it looks like it wasn’t even a blind side block by the so-called letter of the rule book. Glad someone is looking at this somewhat objectively.
I don’t understand how any serious football fan can look at what transpired on that play and think that it was a just or reasonable ruling. Unless you are an LSU fan and your team directly benefited, that is. I mean the game was basically decided for the other team because a guy got pushed down to the ground (in a tackle football game). That’s ridiculous. Anyways, we will all have to just agree to disagree ultimately.
I don’t understand how any serious football fan can look at what transpired on that play and think that it was a just or reasonable ruling. Unless you are an LSU fan and your team directly benefited, that is. I mean the game was basically decided for the other team because a guy got pushed down to the ground (in a tackle football game). That’s ridiculous. Anyways, we will all have to just agree to disagree ultimately.
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 10:49 am
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:48 am to wertheimer
quote:
Okay, so it looks like it wasn’t even a blind side block by the so-called letter of the rule book. Glad someone is looking at this somewhat objectively.
I get why they think it was. On a very base level I sympathize. But the referees are supposed to call according to the rules and not according to popular opinion or how they feel.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:51 am to DawgsLife
quote:
He was blocking for the INT return. And pretty much just pushed the QB on top of that. I've watched this over and over again, and i still don't understand it.
I have to agree.
Pushing a player with hands is never considered an illegal block unless a player is out of bounds. And it was quite clear that the QB was reacting to the play and not a defenseless bystander.
Its too bad that it wasn't reviewed. It would have been a TD.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 10:57 am to Chip82
I think most arguing the point...it comes from a misunderstanding of what the rule says. And in fairness to them, the rule was changed a short time ago.
I do think and agree that blindside blocks used as the current rule states is a good rule. A player can get hurt really badly by blindsided blocks.
That said, I can remember several times when I played that I used a blindsided block against my opponents and used to actively look for that opportunity. But that was a long, long time ago and the game was completely different. I still have aches and pains I deal with today because of how the game was played back then.
I do think and agree that blindside blocks used as the current rule states is a good rule. A player can get hurt really badly by blindsided blocks.
That said, I can remember several times when I played that I used a blindsided block against my opponents and used to actively look for that opportunity. But that was a long, long time ago and the game was completely different. I still have aches and pains I deal with today because of how the game was played back then.

Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:02 am to DawgsLife
quote:
First, the current rule on illegal blindside blocks as written in Rule 12-2-7: It is a foul if a player initiates a block when his path is toward or parallel to his own end line and makes forcible contact to his opponent with his helmet, forearm, or shoulder.
Where did you get this? Blindside block is under rule 9.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:06 am to djsdawg
quote:
Blindside block is under rule 9.
Post it, then. I'll read it.
ETA
Maybe later. I am going to watch some games right now.
This post was edited on 12/21/24 at 11:10 am
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:12 am to DawgsLife
Rule 9-1-18-1:
No player shall deliver a blind side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact.
No player shall deliver a blind side block by attacking an opponent with forcible contact.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:13 am to djsdawg
quote:RUlE 9 / CondUCt oF PlayERs and othERs sUbjECt to thE RUlEs Fi-75
Blindside block is under rule 9
Blind-Side Block—ARTICLE 18
Approved Ruling 9-1-18
I B44 intercepts the pass of A12 at the B-20 and turns back up-field on the
return During the return, B21 approaches A88 at midfield from the blind
side and blocks A88 (a) with extended hands; (b) with a screen type block;
(c) by attacking with forcible contact with his shoulder into the chest of
A88; (d) by attacking with forcible contact with the shoulder into the head
of A88 B44 returns the pass to the A-20 RULING: (a) No foul (b) No
foul (c) Personal Foul, blind-side block, 15-yard penalty from the spot
of the foul (d) Personal Foul, Blind-Side Block with Targeting, 15-yard
penalty from the spot of the foul and B21 is disqualified
Based on this section.... use of the hands is (a) no foul.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:14 am to UFFan
Any game involving referees is a poorly officiated game.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:14 am to Marktastic86
quote:
SEC officials went from being some of the best in the country the past couple of decades
quote:
Alabama fan

Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:16 am to Chip82
quote:
Based on this section.... use of the hands is (a) no foul.
These 2 sections are certainly contradictory.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:21 am to PappyGarcia
quote:
USC/LSU is #1 and not even close. Kept us out of the playoffs.
I think the penalty is dumb, but your player was stupid and should have known better.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:22 am to UFFan
quote:
What other badly officiated games have there been?
Oh, I'd say about........10,000 or so over the years. I stopped counting.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:25 am to DawgsLife
You can’t de-cleat a defenseless player who is not capable of making the play
Posted on 12/21/24 at 11:30 am to plazadweller
quote:
Ga/Tech
What was the worst call?
Popular
Back to top
