Started By
Message
re: Will Auburn ever have the kind of depth needed to win when it matters?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:54 pm to DaWGfan01
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:54 pm to DaWGfan01
quote:
We've never bought one, we have 2 legit, no shenanigans, I'll take that doing it the right way.
I agree, and they have two, too. They don't have a leg to stand on.
0
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:55 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Meh. Most reasonable fans accept the 1942 one. I'm not too concerned about that one. However, the statement was made when we win one. We already have.
1942 was retroactively claimed in the 80s.
The same sources that recognize 1942 for Georgia also recognize 1913 for Auburn.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:55 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The idea that a healthy right shoulder would have created room to run out of thin air is delusional.
Agreed. Add to that, that Michel came out of the game, so....
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:56 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
I call it like I see it. If that means Auburn, Florida, Bama, Tennessee, etc. deserve some credit from time to time, then it should be given.
Please link a few threads of you jumping trolling AU fans like you did me in this thread.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:57 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Please link a few threads of you jumping trolling AU fans like you did me in this thread.
You know....you don't have to troll to prove you are a fan, right?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:01 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
You know....you don't have to troll to prove you are a fan, right?
Not trolling Kyle. He likes all fans to be reasonable, so with all the AU trolling of UGA since first of December, there has to be a few threads to show that, right? If not, one might wonder why the only fan he jumps is a UGA fan trolling aubies.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:04 pm to Korin
quote:
1942 was retroactively claimed in the 80s.
And?
quote:Not quite. BR claime it for Auburn in 1913. Harvard and Chicago had more sources naming them over Auburn.
The same sources that recognize 1942 for Georgia also recognize 1913 for Auburn.
B(QPRS), BR, DeS, HS, L, PS, SR, WS named Georgia National Champions in 1942. More sources than any other team had.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:04 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
quote:
Call me when UGA wins a NC. Until then they are at a level just above the USCe, A&Ms and the MS schools of the SEC.
And Auburn's I guess? We have as many National Championships as Auburn and the same number from 1960 until the present.
Difference is players on UGAs last team to win the NC are Grandparents and the players on AU last team to win one are just starting a family.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:04 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Not quite.
CFDW and Winsipedia.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:05 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
And?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:05 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Not trolling Kyle.
That's not what I meant. you were asking him to provide links to threads of him trolling or jumping on Auburn fans to prove he was a "true" Georgia fan.
quote:
If not, one might wonder why the only fan he jumps is a UGA fan trolling aubies.
What do you consider jumping? Disagreeing?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:07 pm to Korin
quote:
Winsipedia.
quote:Wikipedia?
CFDW
Where do you think they got their information from? They aren't polls. They are information centers. They based their information on that one poll.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:09 pm to DawgsLife
Doesn't know what the CFDW is.
Gives Alabama shite for retroactively claiming titles but does the same thing.
Gives Alabama shite for retroactively claiming titles but does the same thing.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:10 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Difference is players on UGAs last team to win the NC are Grandparents and the players on AU last team to win one are just starting a family.
Last I checked it is still a National Championship. Is there an expiration date on natties, now?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:12 pm to Korin
quote:
Doesn't know what the CFDW is.
Yes I do. College Football Data Warehouse is an American college football statistics website that was established in 2000 and went on hiatus in March 2017.
It doesn't change the fact that it is not a poll, but an information wharehouse that gathers information. If I find 1,000 sites that cite a poll that georgia won a National Title in 1942, does that mean I have 1,000 polls saying they won it?
quote:
Gives Alabama shite for retroactively claiming titles but does the same thing.
No, I don't. Name one time where I have done this.
You are naming sources, not polls. I am naming polls.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:13 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
You are naming sources, not polls. I am naming polls.
And no poll at the time picked Georgia.
If y'all have 2 then Auburn has 3. You can't have it both ways...
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:18 pm to Korin
quote:
And no poll at the time picked Georgia.
Yes they did.
B(QPRS), BR, DeS, HS, L, PS, SR, WS all named Georgia.
There a ton of polls that named their own champions. Those were the ones that picked Georgia. It wasn't until 1950 that the NCAA decided to officially recognize only teams picked by certain polls, none of which existed in 1942.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:18 pm to Korin
quote:
And no poll at the time picked Georgia
This is false:
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:19 pm to Korin
quote:
And no poll at the time picked Georgia.
If y'all have 2 then Auburn has 3. You can't have it both ways...
Dude. Of the polls that existed, more polls, by far, picked Georgia in 1942. Not true of Auburn in 1913.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:20 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Yes they did.
B(QPRS), BR, DeS, HS, L, PS, SR, WS all named Georgia.
There a ton of polls that named their own champions. Those were the ones that picked Georgia. It wasn't until 1950 that the NCAA decided to officially recognize only teams picked by certain polls, none of which existed in 1942.
Someone needs to hit up the records book and stay off of Wikipedia...
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News