Started By
Message

Who Really Had The SECs toughest Schedule? - MrSEC
Posted on 11/18/13 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 11/18/13 at 6:39 pm
LINK
SO WHO’S REALLY HAD THE SEC’S TOUGHEST SCHEDULE?
November 18th, 2013 10:20 AM
Posted By: John Pennington
Much has been made of the SEC’s in-conference football schedule since Missouri and Texas A&M joined the league two seasons ago. Prior to expansion, most every SEC school was fine the old rotation — five games inside the division, two rotating foes from the opposite division, and one permanent foe from that other division. There weren’t many yelps, whines or squeals about “easy” schedules versus “hard” schedules.
That changed — in large part thanks to LSU’s Les Miles and Joe Alleva and South Carolina’s Steve Spurrier — when the SEC decided to stick with an eight-game schedule for a 14-team league. With seven teams inside each division, that meant six games would come from the inside for each school and just two from the outside. That made those two games versus the opposite division more important. Suddenly, “We’ve got a harder schedule than they do” became a major issue for a couple of schools and tons of fans.
The fact that the SEC hasn’t simply unveiled a new schedule rotation featuring nine games with three played against the opposite division has only made matters worse. Instead of an added league game, schools are using that extra slot to schedule FCS foes. That’s not good for attendance or the league’s reputation. And without an expanded schedule and or set rotation, the league’s makeshift schedules have come under fire for who has drawn who and for teams having to play at a rival school’s stadium in back-to-back years.
With just a couple of weeks left in the SEC regular season, we thought we’d take a look at who’s has had the most difficult league schedule to date according to each team’s win column. Below you’ll find that we’ve tallied up all of the SEC wins by each team’s eight in-conference opponents. There are still games to be played, so these numbers will change. Also, keep in mind that teams don’t play themselves. Alabama, for example, can’t play itself (seven league wins) so the Tide’s opponents will all get credit for seven wins by the opposition while Bama does not. Winless Kentucky can’t play itself so it won’t get a zero in our chart to pull its schedule strength down.
Still, this is just a quickie, simplified view of SEC scheduling to this point in the season. It’s not exactly what folks would have projected preseason…
School Opp. SEC Wins Opp. Div. Wins
Tennessee 34 13
Arkansas 33 9
Kentucky 30 8
Miss. State 29t 6
Ole Miss 29t 8
LSU 28t 7
Texas A&M 28t 8
Georgia 27 9
Vanderbilt 26 7
Missouri 24 7
Auburn 23 5
Florida 22 3
Alabama 18 1
S. Carolina 17 1
The school with the hardest league schedule this year is clearly Tennessee. Part of that is due to Missouri’s surprise rise in the East and part is due to having to play both Alabama (permanent) and Auburn from the West. While Miles and Alleva complain about how tough life is for the Tigers, UT’s brass has not only been whine-free… they’ve championed the continuation of the Vols’ annual series with Bama, the best program in college football the last five years. Kudos for having some guts.
Meanwhile, LSU’s “impossible” schedule ranks near the middle of the pack. Georgia and Florida — projected to be such meanies — currently sit in the middle of the East Division standings (due in part to injuries). Perhaps the three-loss Tigers should have worried more about Ole Miss than their East foes.
South Carolina’s Spurrier has complained about the league schedule, yet his team has had the easiest cakewalk in the SEC so far. This offseason, Spurrier’s complaints were “for” poor Tennessee and Florida who always have to play Alabama and LSU, respectively (though neither of those schools complains). Games with Arkansas (no wins) and Mississippi State (one win) sure haven’t been tough Carolina this fall.
Even Alabama’s schedule this year — Tennessee (one win) and Kentucky (no wins) — looks tougher at the moment than the Carolina’s.
None of this will hush the schedule moans, of course. It will only lead to different groups moaning that they’ve been handed a tougher task than their rivals. And that will continue to be the case until the league finally gives in and goes to a nine-game slate with a 6-1-2 rotation.
SO WHO’S REALLY HAD THE SEC’S TOUGHEST SCHEDULE?
November 18th, 2013 10:20 AM
Posted By: John Pennington
Much has been made of the SEC’s in-conference football schedule since Missouri and Texas A&M joined the league two seasons ago. Prior to expansion, most every SEC school was fine the old rotation — five games inside the division, two rotating foes from the opposite division, and one permanent foe from that other division. There weren’t many yelps, whines or squeals about “easy” schedules versus “hard” schedules.
That changed — in large part thanks to LSU’s Les Miles and Joe Alleva and South Carolina’s Steve Spurrier — when the SEC decided to stick with an eight-game schedule for a 14-team league. With seven teams inside each division, that meant six games would come from the inside for each school and just two from the outside. That made those two games versus the opposite division more important. Suddenly, “We’ve got a harder schedule than they do” became a major issue for a couple of schools and tons of fans.
The fact that the SEC hasn’t simply unveiled a new schedule rotation featuring nine games with three played against the opposite division has only made matters worse. Instead of an added league game, schools are using that extra slot to schedule FCS foes. That’s not good for attendance or the league’s reputation. And without an expanded schedule and or set rotation, the league’s makeshift schedules have come under fire for who has drawn who and for teams having to play at a rival school’s stadium in back-to-back years.
With just a couple of weeks left in the SEC regular season, we thought we’d take a look at who’s has had the most difficult league schedule to date according to each team’s win column. Below you’ll find that we’ve tallied up all of the SEC wins by each team’s eight in-conference opponents. There are still games to be played, so these numbers will change. Also, keep in mind that teams don’t play themselves. Alabama, for example, can’t play itself (seven league wins) so the Tide’s opponents will all get credit for seven wins by the opposition while Bama does not. Winless Kentucky can’t play itself so it won’t get a zero in our chart to pull its schedule strength down.
Still, this is just a quickie, simplified view of SEC scheduling to this point in the season. It’s not exactly what folks would have projected preseason…
School Opp. SEC Wins Opp. Div. Wins
Tennessee 34 13
Arkansas 33 9
Kentucky 30 8
Miss. State 29t 6
Ole Miss 29t 8
LSU 28t 7
Texas A&M 28t 8
Georgia 27 9
Vanderbilt 26 7
Missouri 24 7
Auburn 23 5
Florida 22 3
Alabama 18 1
S. Carolina 17 1
The school with the hardest league schedule this year is clearly Tennessee. Part of that is due to Missouri’s surprise rise in the East and part is due to having to play both Alabama (permanent) and Auburn from the West. While Miles and Alleva complain about how tough life is for the Tigers, UT’s brass has not only been whine-free… they’ve championed the continuation of the Vols’ annual series with Bama, the best program in college football the last five years. Kudos for having some guts.
Meanwhile, LSU’s “impossible” schedule ranks near the middle of the pack. Georgia and Florida — projected to be such meanies — currently sit in the middle of the East Division standings (due in part to injuries). Perhaps the three-loss Tigers should have worried more about Ole Miss than their East foes.
South Carolina’s Spurrier has complained about the league schedule, yet his team has had the easiest cakewalk in the SEC so far. This offseason, Spurrier’s complaints were “for” poor Tennessee and Florida who always have to play Alabama and LSU, respectively (though neither of those schools complains). Games with Arkansas (no wins) and Mississippi State (one win) sure haven’t been tough Carolina this fall.
Even Alabama’s schedule this year — Tennessee (one win) and Kentucky (no wins) — looks tougher at the moment than the Carolina’s.
None of this will hush the schedule moans, of course. It will only lead to different groups moaning that they’ve been handed a tougher task than their rivals. And that will continue to be the case until the league finally gives in and goes to a nine-game slate with a 6-1-2 rotation.
This post was edited on 11/18/13 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 11/18/13 at 6:45 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
The school with the hardest league schedule this year is clearly Tennessee. Part of that is due to Missouri’s surprise rise in the East and part is due to having to play both Alabama (permanent) and Auburn from the West. While Miles and Alleva complain about how tough life is for the Tigers, UT’s brass has not only been whine-free… they’ve championed the continuation of the Vols’ annual series with Bama, the best program in college football the last five years. Kudos for having some guts.
Don't forget Oregon
Posted on 11/18/13 at 6:47 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
Don't forget Oregon
I still can't believe UT didn't either buy that game out or ask to have it moved back a couple of years.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 6:47 pm to Mizz-SEC
Alabama. They didn't have the luxury of playing Alabama.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:04 pm to BamaDude06
quote:
I still can't believe UT didn't either buy that game out or ask to have it moved back a couple of years.
Why? When they can take the beating now, during the Jones honeymoon, and be done with it.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:08 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
Who Really Had The SECs toughest Schedule?
Tennessee had the toughest schedule in the country, and I have a hard time seeing how it's anyone else. It was arguably the toughest when Auburn and Missouri were supposed to be easy wins. Now it's just unfair.
This post was edited on 11/18/13 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:10 pm to ohiovol
+ healthy florida D and Georgia before their downward spiral
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:11 pm to scrooster
quote:
Why? When they can take the beating now, during the Jones honeymoon, and be done with it.
IMO, better to replace it with a rent a win to try and become bowl eligible. Extra practice time with a new staff is a great thing. The Bama seniors in 2008 said that one of the best things to happen to the team was the Independence Bowl practices in Saban's first year. It mark the turning point for the program.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:14 pm to BamaDude06
quote:
IMO, better to replace it with a rent a win to try and become bowl eligible. Extra practice time with a new staff is a great thing. The Bama seniors in 2008 said that one of the best things to happen to the team was the Independence Bowl practices in Saban's first year. It mark the turning point for the program.
I just wish we got that shite done during the Dooley error.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:23 pm to ohiovol
did tenn play 4 top 10 teams in consecutive weeks?
Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:44 pm to CajunRebel
in a 5 game stretch played 4 top 10 teams, the one was south Carolina @ 11 

Posted on 11/18/13 at 7:48 pm to MID_TN_VOL
Tenn - hasn't mentioned it because it hasn't mattered. They needed a Bama to garner interest.
Had Tenn been 1 play, one bad call and one great drive away from having all the crystal - they might think different.
We will never know. But we know.
Had Tenn been 1 play, one bad call and one great drive away from having all the crystal - they might think different.
We will never know. But we know.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:05 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Tennessee had the toughest schedule in the country, and I have a hard time seeing how it's anyone else. It was arguably the toughest when Auburn and Missouri were supposed to be easy wins. Now it's just unfair.
I agree that UTk has the toughest schedule out there but Auburn was never going to be an easy win. I'm not arguing that I thought you guys would pull it out at the start of the season but it wasn't going to be easy.
And I would say that UGA has a legitimate argument about playing in Auburn two years in a row. How hard was it to get that scheduled right? The reason I bring that up is that if they go back to a normal home away between the two now, we would have UGA and Bama on the road to finish the year next year which is rough.
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:10 pm to CajunRebel
quote:
did tenn play 4 top 10 teams in consecutive weeks?
Since you're counting teams that are no longer top 10, It's 5 straight games against top 10 teams. And four straight weeks against teams that have been top 10 (although South Carolina plummeted all the way to 11).
This post was edited on 11/18/13 at 9:13 pm
Popular
Back to top
