Started By
Message
re: When TRO is reversed Alabama will have vacated season
Posted on 1/22/26 at 6:46 pm to Crimson K
Posted on 1/22/26 at 6:46 pm to Crimson K
Say this goes on for awhile and it comes to tournament time, due to the fact the NCAA still host the tournament and determines who plays in it, could the NCAA determine those wins were deemed not valid in their eyes thus hindering them from entering the NCAA tournament?
1
Posted on 1/22/26 at 6:49 pm to Crimson K
quote:There's another court that is superior to his. Alabama is playing with fire.
1. I am curious how the NCAA is going to respond if the judge calls them to account for threatening action when the ruling specifically forbids it.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 6:59 pm to paperwasp
quote:
Eh, is that from this same judge who issued the TRO? If so, logic states that if his TRO doesn’t stand, neither will this.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:02 pm to stitchop
bitchchop always has BAMA on his mind.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:20 pm to stitchop
quote:
When TRO is reversed Alabama will have vacated season
The NCAA doesn't want that smoke. Alabama will thunder frick their skull into oblivion.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:29 pm to UTK
quote:
Say this goes on for awhile and it comes to tournament time, due to the fact the NCAA still host the tournament and determines who plays in it, could the NCAA determine those wins were deemed not valid in their eyes thus hindering them from entering the NCAA tournament?
They probably don't want to have Alabama obviously mis-seeded because Alabama will 100% dragoon their arse into a federal court over that one.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:37 pm to paperwasp
Who cares if this bammer donor judge says the NCAA can’t punish bama? How is that enforceable? Why not just add in the TOR that bama must be named national champion? What’s stopping a judge from doing that?
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:43 pm to AUTiger789
If the NCAA is already leaking “we intend on not following the TRO” then I don’t suspect court is going to go well for them on Tuesday.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:45 pm to Diego Ricardo
I see where you’re coming from and can see that. I can also see them being petty a hell as hell and doing it. I mean, in reality, the NCAA is just an entity at this point with no purpose or regulatory power, but still hold the tournament and could pull a big FU to undermining their authority, as such. Not saying they are/would, but technically couldn’t they do that? I’m just spit balling here and just curious.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:48 pm to UTK
quote:
I see where you’re coming from and can see that. I can also see them being petty a hell as hell and doing it. I mean, in reality, the NCAA is just an entity at this point with no purpose or regulatory power, but still hold the tournament and could pull a big FU to undermining their authority, as such. Not saying they are/would, but technically couldn’t they do that? I’m just spit balling here and just curious.
They would be checkmating themselves I think. I don't think the TRO would be invalidated altogether by the higher court, so if they violated the 3rd point of the TRO then they're entering a world of shite.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News