Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:46 pm to Grievous Angel
Lol so if one year a system is put in a scenario where it can't reasonably determine a National Champ, that somehow invalidates the years where it did reasonably determine one? This year was the most unique, and exposed the flaws of the BCS, that doesn't mean it didn't determine a champion in years where subjective metrics couldn't overcome objective results.
Just because you get one defective part off the assembly line, you don't have to recall the whole product line. You just don't give the defective parts a seal of approval and destroy them before getting to market.
I mean even if you don't agree with my stance, you don't have to act like a baby about it.
Just because you get one defective part off the assembly line, you don't have to recall the whole product line. You just don't give the defective parts a seal of approval and destroy them before getting to market.
I mean even if you don't agree with my stance, you don't have to act like a baby about it.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:48 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Lol so if one year a system is put in a scenario where it can't reasonably determine a National Champ, that somehow invalidates the years where it did reasonably determine one?
You pretend that this year is the first year we had BCS controversy. Hello, Auburn?
There's been controversy more often than not.
You want to diminish what USC did that year?
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:48 pm to TeLeFaWx
1941 bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:48 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
This year was the most unique, and exposed the flaws of the BCS,
It actually did what it was supposed to do. Matched #1 and #2 in the title game.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:50 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
then all titles prior to the National Championship Series are hereby invalidated.
Even this isn't under NCAA auspices. The BCS will be renamed something else but it still is an outside entity. I believe this the case anyway.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:51 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
Are people disputing the best two teams weren't in the game? And if LSU wasn't #2, then who was?
I mean, a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama, but that's why you play the game, the better team doesn't always win, and teams aren't always at their peak through the course of the season. Results matter more.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:52 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama,
UAT loses by 4 touchdowns if Party Boy Dareus hadn't taken him out.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:53 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean, a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama,
You are precious.
Still carrying the water.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:53 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Even this isn't under NCAA auspices. The BCS will be renamed something else but it still is an outside entity. I believe this the case anyway.
You are correct. It still won't be "officially" recognized by the NCAA.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:53 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean, a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama, but that's why you play the game, the better team doesn't always win,
Okay, I'm starting to like this guy, in a 'drive slowly past the burning wreckage' sort of way.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:54 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean, a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama, but that's why you play the game, the better team doesn't always win, and teams aren't always at their peak through the course of the season. Results matter more.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:54 pm to Grievous Angel
Auburn/USC is also an example of the BCS not being able to reasonably determine a National Champ, but it was MUCH more objective than this last year. Literally the fashion in which TWO seperate games could have completely altered who the champion was without changing the win/loss record of the teams involved, that wasn't the case with USC/Auburn.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:55 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean, a tu team lead by Colt McCoy was way better than Bama, but that's why you play the game, the better team doesn't always win, and teams aren't always at their peak through the course of the season.
I seem to remember colt not moving the ball down the field very well while he was in.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:56 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I seem to remember colt not moving the ball down the field very well while he was in.
That's good because I don't think Colt remembers anything.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:57 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Okay, I'm starting to like this guy, in a 'drive slowly past the burning wreckage' sort of way.
I was talking in circles because the gumps are really afraid to acknowledge any of my points for fear of validating my whole opinion, when in reality they can just argue the merits like normal people. I'm getting bored. I had to throw gasoline on the fire.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:58 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I seem to remember colt not moving the ball down the field very well while he was in
I seem to remember about 5000 other teams moving the ball and even scoring early against Bama, only to have Bama adjust and shut it down.
He was in--what--like five plays? Then ran a designed play into the teeth of the Bama front.
Kind of stupid on their part, IMO.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:59 pm to TeLeFaWx
The "the better team doesn't always win" was audience appropriate perfection.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 11:59 pm to Grievous Angel
lol Colt McCoy straight up quit, at least Tebow stopped at crying.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 12:00 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
And it can be used in appropriate situations. However, in a 16 point loss, not so much.
Page 19 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News