Started By
Message
re: What's up with this lack of respect for Auburn?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:44 pm to BillyBobfan24_7
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:44 pm to BillyBobfan24_7
quote:
Malzahn isn't going to be there to carry Chiz's jock forever.
Not thinking Chiz is a good coach = mistake #1.
quote:
But LSU is young as frick as well as Auburn and still clearly ahead.
Next year, in talent, LSU will not be far enough ahead to make an appreciable difference. Yes ahead, but the margin is close enough to call it pretty much a wash. Especially when the incoming freshmen are factored in.
quote:
We won two BCS National Championships. What good did Auburn's undefeated season do for them in 2004? Did they win some press harold's National Championship that I didn't hear about.
You dipshits are just flaming while you can before you get curb stomped this weekend. Good for you.
Yeah you won two titles. And it was chance and luck that you played for either one of them. Put it this way, 2004 or 2010 AU would be just as likely to beat 2003 and 2007 LSU as vice versa.
And we didn't lose any games either year.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:46 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
What's up with this lack of respect for Auburn?
quote:
Ole Miss 38, Fresno 28 @ Fresno
Fresno 31, Utah State 21 @ Fresno
Auburn 42, Utah State 38 @ Auburn
Took 3 games of separation to prove this out when 1 game of separation is usually pretty inaccurate....hell my method of saying they suck was much more accurate.
Go back and read what my post was respnding to. My post was not to show they sucked; I had already done that. This post was specifically to show the fallacy of assuming that Auburn would beat Ole Miss.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:47 pm to BamaGradinTn
You're a funny little guy in thinking Ole Miss will beat us.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:49 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Next year, in talent, LSU will not be far enough ahead to make an appreciable difference. Yes ahead, but the margin is close enough to call it pretty much a wash. Especially when the incoming freshmen are factored in.
We'll still have the better team and the better staff.
quote:
And it was chance and luck that you played for either one of them.
boo fricking hoo
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:49 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
BTW, here are the last 3 classes average rankings.
LSU: 6
AU: 7.6
Last 2:
AU: 3.5
LSU: 7.5
Trust me, the talent gap will be pretty small next year and going forward. This year is different as we basically lack an entire senior class. But this is the last year we lack the talent/depth/experience to compete with anyone.
LSU: 6
AU: 7.6
Last 2:
AU: 3.5
LSU: 7.5
Trust me, the talent gap will be pretty small next year and going forward. This year is different as we basically lack an entire senior class. But this is the last year we lack the talent/depth/experience to compete with anyone.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:49 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
TTsTowel
What's up with this lack of respect for Auburn?
So you think Ole Miss will beat us. Excuse me while I talk a ride on the Lawlzers express to whatAdumbassville.
You're an idiot. I didn't say that Ole Miss would or wouldn't beat you. What I pointed out was how your performance aganst Utah State shows how utterly pathetic your team is.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:50 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
What I pointed out was how your performance aganst Utah State shows how utterly pathetic your team is.
It actually doesn't, we won.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
boo fricking hoo
I ain't whining. I pulled for you guys in 2003 and 2007. And I pulled hard for you guys. I am just pointing out that your 2003 and 2007 teams are no better than our 2004 and 2010. In fact, I do not think they are as good, but that is debatable and has been done here enough already.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:54 pm to blzr
So fresno st is going to win the west? 
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:55 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
I ain't whining. I pulled for you guys in 2003 and 2007. And I pulled hard for you guys. I am just pointing out that your 2003 and 2007 teams are no better than our 2004 and 2010. In fact, I do not think they are as good, but that is debatable and has been done here enough already.
Doesn't really matter what you think. LSU is still the better program both now and all-time.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:58 pm to dkreller
quote:
y'all suck that's why
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:58 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
I ain't whining
You ain't?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:00 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Doesn't really matter what you think. LSU is still the better program both now and all-time.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:01 pm to stat19
Look gump. Maybe you are not that bright and do not listen very well.
I guess that sucks for you, but it really doesn't matter too me.
I guess that sucks for you, but it really doesn't matter too me.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:01 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Next year, in talent, LSU will not be far enough ahead to make an appreciable difference. Yes ahead, but the margin is close enough to call it pretty much a wash. Especially when the incoming freshmen are factored in.
I somewhat disagree with that, I think it will take Au 2 more tp 5 classes to be on par with LSU or Bama. You're getting closer each year but just not there as soon as you're predicting.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:04 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
I somewhat disagree with that, I think it will take Au 2 more tp 5 classes to be on par with LSU or Bama. You're getting closer each year but just not there as soon as you're predicting.
Reasonable opinion. I think we are close enough next year with the X factor being injury, but your opinion is certainly reasonable.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:07 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Yes ahead, but the margin is close enough to call it pretty much a wash. Especially when the incoming freshmen are factored in
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:08 pm to LaBornNRaised
Hey numbnuts. You wanna back up your cute little lol faces or is that all you got?
I suspect it is the latter, but maybe you will surprise me?
I suspect it is the latter, but maybe you will surprise me?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:11 pm to LaBornNRaised
It's not so much the 5-2, it's who the 5 are and the fact that you've only played one of the three toughest games on your schedule yet. You are looking down the barrel at a minimum of 4 losses it appears to me.
Popular
Back to top


4







