Started By
Message
Posted on 10/17/13 at 7:41 pm to bisonduck
That is true in the NCG.
You and your Mighty Duck team didnt cross the 50yd line During the Cowboy Classic with your Octane Offense.
40-27 without our Starting QB
You and your Mighty Duck team didnt cross the 50yd line During the Cowboy Classic with your Octane Offense.
40-27 without our Starting QB
Posted on 10/17/13 at 7:52 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
15:00 1 01:11 ORE 13 5 -7 Punt
11:14 1 00:51 ORE 35 3 1 Punt
08:09 1 04:14 ORE 48 12 39 Field Goal Good
01:12 1 00:30 ORE 20 3 7 Field Goal Good
14:43 2 00:49 ORE 12 2 -1 Interception
12:57 2 07:41 ORE 20 19 79 Rushing Touchdown
00:44 2 00:44 ORE 26 2 7 End of Half
Posted on 10/17/13 at 7:56 pm to whiskeyjohn
I love it, whenever a weakness is commented on, bammers go to the good ol butt hurt schtick.
Could be maybe Oregon's got a great offense? And Bama has a pedestrian defense this year ?
Could be maybe Oregon's got a great offense? And Bama has a pedestrian defense this year ?
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:19 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
No. LMAO. that you think your defense has gotten better once you played softer teams. What's your answer when LSU and AUBURN hang 40 in you?
Nice deflection. You weren't vocal about this last year, were you?
As for LSU and auburn hanging 40 on us, we'll see. We already know you suck, so far that hasn't been demonstrated with us but there are several games to go.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:37 pm to BamaFatigue
quote:
He's more than capable of beating a team through the air if the running game is being stifled.
17-14 OT. In the biggest game of his career, he failed to hit those passes versus an average Stanford secondary last season.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:52 pm to Gardevoir
quote:I like how they tout how badass Stanford is until they point out our 1 loss last season to them in overtime, then they try to downplay Stanford's talent. That game was a team failure, not just a QB failure. I also blame that shite on our retarded FG kicker who chokes in all the big games.
17-14 OT. In the biggest game of his career, he failed to hit those passes versus an average Stanford secondary last season.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:57 pm to BamaFatigue
Your "superpowered" offense got shut down in the most important game of the year. Your FG kicker isn't to blame for that.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 8:58 pm to Gardevoir
We should've gotten a mulligan...
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:00 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
Your "superpowered" offense got shut down in the most important game of the year. Your FG kicker isn't to blame for that.
He missed not 1 but 2 important FGs during that game, so yeah he shoulders a huge part of the failure. The rest of it was Stanford playing a good game, getting the benefit of a fricked up call in the endzone that was ruled a TD when the guy was clearly out of bounds, and us shooting ourselves with our own gun. Bama loved it though. It's the only reason they got to the championship.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:01 pm to bisonduck
quote:
We should've gotten a mulligan...
You might have, if there had been any reason to believe that Stanford was the best team in the country. But they weren't, so you didn't.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:02 pm to BamaFatigue
quote:
He missed not 1 but 2 important FGs during that game, so yeah he shoulders a huge part of the failure. The rest of it was Stanford playing a good game, getting the benefit of a fricked up call in the endzone that was ruled a TD when the guy was clearly out of bounds, and us shooting ourselves with our own gun. Bama loved it though. It's the only reason they got to the championship.
All of that is relevant to the question of why Stanford won, but it doesn't answer the question of why Oregon's offense was invisible in that game. Even if you had been the ones to win 17-14, the point is that a good defense can just shut that offense down.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:05 pm to Crimson Legend
Didn't your offense score 17 last year in a game? It is not a revelation that an offense can be stopped. Our offense gets stopped Mon thru Friday.
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:52 pm to BamaFatigue
Another year... another overhyped, overrated, team of the century comes to play against the evil SEC empire and loses by three scores.
Again... until the DUCKS win SOMETHING they are just the next fraud in line to get beat down. But hey... nice touch on the pink helmets. Some 11 year old in China worked real hard to get them done for Nike in time for the game.
Again... until the DUCKS win SOMETHING they are just the next fraud in line to get beat down. But hey... nice touch on the pink helmets. Some 11 year old in China worked real hard to get them done for Nike in time for the game.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 9:56 pm to whiskeyjohn
quote:
Again... until the DUCKS win SOMETHING they are just the next fraud in line to get beat down. But hey... nice touch on the pink helmets. Some 11 year old in China worked real hard to get them done for Nike in time for the game.
Keep drinking the haterade. Better throw out those Nike shoes you're wearing, or that Nike hat. Or maybe that Nike golfball in your golfbag.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:01 pm to BamaFatigue
I am all Adidas. They pay more than Nike in China.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:03 pm to whiskeyjohn
Two Oregon threads on the SECr. 

This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:05 pm to whiskeyjohn
quote:
Again... until the DUCKS win SOMETHING they are just the next fraud in line to get beat down. But hey... nice touch on the pink helmets. Some 11 year old in China worked real hard to get them done for Nike in time for the game.
Your concern for the average Chinese laborer is touching.

This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:08 pm to BamaFatigue
quote:
Or maybe that Nike golfball in your golfbag.

Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:40 pm to BamaFatigue
We have this qb that runs the zone read and he could take it to the house on oregon along with a power running game. We already play a team that has a high uptempo offense. There called clemson and they haven't beaten us in 4 years. Thats what you are clemson. You choke like they do you run a gimmick offense in a subpar league like they do and your uni's blow like there's do.
Popular
Back to top
