BamaFatigue
| Favorite team: | Oregon  |
| Location: | Oregun |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 285 |
| Registered on: | 10/15/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 8:01 pm
quote:Our schedule is heavily backloaded and we don't play severely injured teams and then boast how bad azz we are when we beat them. Mizzou is capital B, BAD AZZ. :bow:
the SOS argument. No Oregon fan would use that in an argument as its a weak area when compared to the SEC
2
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:56 pm
quote:Isn't Stanford still ranked #6? And didn't Bama lose to Utah in a recent bowl game? :cool:
Didnt Stanford lose to Utah?
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:54 pm
quote:I like how you tacked on one extra loss for UCLA and conveniently forgot to mention Stanford or the fact that OR St. is ranked. Big surprise coming from an FSU fan. :lol:
Yeah... UCLA, (3-loss) Washington and Oregon State are all powerhouses
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:51 pm
quote:You are Bama. As such being pussies comes with the territory. The cream puff schedule. Lackluster OOC competition. You prefer the known to the unknown. I'm sure you want Baylor or Texas Tech as your opponent because you want the easiest win possible. You haven't been challenged and you are overrated.
You are delusional. FSU has a better schedule, QB, coach, team, and fans
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:47 pm
quote:Clemson has proved it doesn't belong and can't run with the big dogs. V Tech? :rotflmao: Why are they even in this discussion? They are like Baylor and Texas Tech. They all play shoddy teams and really don't deserve their current positions in the rankings. It'll be nice to see all of these teams sucker punched out of contention in the coming weeks as the cream rises to the top of the coffee cup.
Wrong answer. Stanford will be ranked below Clemson and possibly even VT
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:44 pm
quote:Which program do you see your team playing in the Chik Fil A bowl this year?
Mizzou and Bama both control their own destiny at this point in time. If one or the other wins out they are in, period.
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:42 pm
quote:Doesn't matter what they did 20 or so whatever the frick years ago. We've been more impressive than them for 4 straight years. They can go ahead and go undefeated if they want to. Won't do them any good. We have the inside track and the tougher competition ahead of us. It's ours to lose.
An undefeated FSU over an undefeated Oregon is a given. Based on public perception alone. FSU is a CFB blue blood against Johnny come lately Oregon.
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:40 pm
quote:Incorrect. There is only 1. And it's the one that wins the SEC championship game. The other is SOL and will be playing in the vaunted Chik Fil A Bowl. :lol:
There are only two programs that control their own destiny to the BCSNC game. Both reside in the SEC
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:38 pm
quote:Easily still in the top 15, maybe even in the top 10 if other teams ahead of them make a poor showing.
And if you beat Stanford what will they be ranked?
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:37 pm
quote:Just for kicks. It's entertaining to set fires under some tiger arse then watch them jump around. :lol:
So if the pollsters know whats up in your opinion why this thread?
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:32 pm
quote:Doesn't worry us at all. They've got a scant lead no longer than a mouse's tail, and just as soft. Beating UCLA will return us to the #2 spot and we'll be there to stay so long as we take care of business.
And they know that FSU is more legit that Oregon
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:30 pm
quote:You lost to Auburn. You're crying on the wrong thread. :wah: :doublebird:
Oregon is the most overrated program in the NCAA
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:29 pm
quote:The BCS formula works. It should be expanded to include 4 teams rather than a ridiculous, biased, fricking political committee comprised of active AD's from U$C and other corruptors who've somehow bought their way in on the panel.
Don't worry Daffy you only have a year left to wait. After that the Ducks will beg for the BCS to be reinstated.
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:26 pm
quote:Yet Stanford is still #6 and the highest 1 loss ranked team. Vegas and the pollsters must know more than you, pachyderm.
And Stanford lost to Utah. Much worse loss than A&M to Auburn
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:24 pm
quote:Yep. Pretty much this. It's why we've retooled and got some bigger guys so we can deal with the SEC when we inevitably clash with them again. We aren't the same team as the 2010 squad.
The only way you can undo that perception will be on the field.
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:21 pm
quote:I am a hawg fan. But only in the sense that I have an appreciation for bacon.
The fact that they're an above average troller, Hawg fan.
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:14 pm
quote:We've got UCLA and Stanford coming up. What was Bama's best win? The aTm win is losing some of its luster after Auburn beat them. If it weren't for the clout of your two straight championships, there would be nothing to justify you sitting at 1. Your SOS is not all that impressive.
Oregon's best win is against an overhyped Washington team
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:07 pm
quote:If you're getting trolled it means you're achieving some success. Oregon knows you exist. I actually think it's funny and entertaining watching an upstart team turn the SEC on it's head. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. :cheers:
We rose up with the spread in 2007 right about the same time that you were rising up as well, you rose higher since then and congrats on that but we are a fellow up tempo offense based initially on 3 star recruits fitting a system...if anything wouldn't a Duck fan be happy to see such a program doing well in the SEC, as justification for thinking your own program is the shizz? Just trying to follow this here other than straight trollin'. I've never given a single frick about Oregon and can't quite follow why they would give a frick about us
re: Realistically, does Missouri belong in the top 5?
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:04 pm
quote:When you play legit competition that isn't decimated by injuries, your stock will rise. Until then you're sitting on borrowed time. :rolleyes:
Oh wait. I get it now. Your pissed because Mizzou who actually now plays legit competition in the SEC gets a top ten ranking
re: Will Mizzou help send a 3rd straight traditional East power out of the Top 25
Posted by BamaFatigue on 10/22/13 at 7:01 pm
quote:These guys are getting pretty big heads. Looks like you all will have to deal with them until Bama lays the clown hammer on them. :lol:
when the SEC homers cross the field, present themselves before the Mizzou army, put their heads between their legs, and kiss their own arse.
Popular
41
