Started By
Message
re: Week 1 PFF SEC QB Passing Grades
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:12 pm to MenloDawg
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:12 pm to MenloDawg
ESPN SEC QB Ratings after week 1
1. Burrow LSU 232.8
2. Tua Bama 217.5
3. Wilson UK. 177.5
4. Mond A&M 160.0
5. Steven MSU. 154.7
6. Franks UF. 151.6
7. Bryant Mizz. 148.2
8. JG. Tenn. 141.8
9. Fromm UGA. 136.5
1. Burrow LSU 232.8
2. Tua Bama 217.5
3. Wilson UK. 177.5
4. Mond A&M 160.0
5. Steven MSU. 154.7
6. Franks UF. 151.6
7. Bryant Mizz. 148.2
8. JG. Tenn. 141.8
9. Fromm UGA. 136.5
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 12:14 pm
1
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:14 pm to 3down10
That’s confusing though. Duke was arguably worse than GA Southern last year, and they lost their only good player, Daniel Jones, to the draft. Do they get some kind of P5 boost?
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:15 pm to Willietd
Almost forgot about the beast D at Texas St
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:16 pm to 3down10
QB rating is a formula based on stats.
PFF grade is scouts going through every single play of the game and grading what the player did on that play.
PFF grade is scouts going through every single play of the game and grading what the player did on that play.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:16 pm to Willietd
Oh yea I didn’t even see Mond up there. Something must have gone wrong with their math. Texas State is 100% a worse defense than GA Southern.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:16 pm to MenloDawg
Except for about 3 bad plays Kelly Bryant was almost unstoppable. Mizzo could have scored 50+ on the road. Bryant is a player.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:17 pm to Cadello
That looks more accurate, to me at least.
Especially Bryant.
I mean they were playing Wyoming and he fumbled and threw are least one interception, right?
And lost.
Especially Bryant.
I mean they were playing Wyoming and he fumbled and threw are least one interception, right?
And lost.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:18 pm to Terrific Tales
quote:
That’s confusing though. Duke was arguably worse than GA Southern last year, and they lost their only good player, Daniel Jones, to the draft. Do they get some kind of P5 boost?
According to the S&P Duke's defense was about 40, not sure about Georgia Southern's, but I doubt it was in the top half. On a side note, Duke's 2018 defense was ranked higher than Oregon's too on the S&P.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:18 pm to higgs_boson
Nah Bryant was pretty good for Missouri IMO.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:19 pm to Terrific Tales
The difference isn’t due to strength of schedule
It’s due to the difference between purely looking at stats and and how they grade
It’s due to the difference between purely looking at stats and and how they grade
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:19 pm to 3down10
quote:
They didn't forget, they just take the quality of the defense into account.
And yet Tua still checking in at 2.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:20 pm to Sun God
quote:
Does the opponent count for like 50%?
these guys aren't my favorite, and I think they use s&p, and factor in way too many variables. Stats don't really matter after one game. They are only good for these conversations but until we have same opponents to compare each other, it is meaningless.
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:21 pm to viceman
Well then I have questions about that duke rating. Their defense did not look near that good last year. Also the Only common opponent I saw was Clemson and the scores were virtually identical.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:22 pm to viceman
quote:
these guys aren't my favorite, and I think they use s&p, and factor in way too many variables. Stats don't really matter after one game. They are only good for these conversations but until we have same opponents to compare each other, it is meaningless.
They don use stats
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:23 pm to viceman
I’m less confused by the Duke one. If thy want to say Duke had an undeniably better defense than GA Southern last year then fine.
Texas State however, has a worse defense than GA Southern, and Mond had a worse performance than Burrow. That just doesn’t make sense.
Texas State however, has a worse defense than GA Southern, and Mond had a worse performance than Burrow. That just doesn’t make sense.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:24 pm to Terrific Tales
quote:
Well then I have questions about that duke rating.
So did I, but 3down10 had a link and when I looked they had Duke at 40, and Oregon at like 47 or something, and it was S&P, which leads me to believe these guys use the S&P, which is crap anyway. Remember there are lies, there are damn lies, and then there are stats.
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:25 pm to Terrific Tales
quote:
Nah Bryant was pretty good for Missouri IMO.
I will take your word for it!
I was watching another game at that time.
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:25 pm to higgs_boson
So was I. Went back and watched the replay
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:26 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
And yet Tua still checking in at 2.
Is that bad or something? Week one stats or ratings.....are we supposed to be embarrassed or something?
Posted on 9/2/19 at 12:27 pm to Commander Data
quote:
Is that bad or something? Week one stats or ratings.....are we supposed to be embarrassed or something?
Nah, it's not about y'all. It's about the metrics upon which this list is based.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News