Started By
Message
re: Was Texas douchy rescinding Mike Stoops
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:34 pm to turnpiketiger
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:34 pm to turnpiketiger
There are a lot of programs that let the boosters run things - we used to be one of them. Texas will be better off when some of the old guard just die off.
0
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:51 pm to Ptins944
quote:
Not unlike Muschamp’s “douchy” rescinding the DC role he “accepted.”
Texas hired position coaches based on his “accepting” the job offer.
It cuts both ways.
Are you fricking retarded? What the frick does it matter what Muschamp did? He's not even remotely involved in this.
Just what we need around here, more dumbass Texas fans.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:02 pm to turnpiketiger
quote:
Bingo. Without boosters there is no major programs. But at the same time you gotta step back and give the HC control. That’s the formula that made places like Alabama and Clemson the way that they are. This is not only a Texas problem is seen across the country. Look at USC.
Alabama isn't immune. After Bear it was a mess all the way up until Saban really.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:36 pm to CharlotteSooner
The hat is probably the best thing he has going for him. I know those Texas oil money boosters aren't liberal Biden voting douches. Sark already having his strings pulled by university admins.
Posted on 1/24/21 at 9:43 pm to Bama2020
What a bunch of cucks
Posted on 1/24/21 at 10:03 pm to Ptins944
Classic Teacup U. You’d rather lose than hire a good coach who isn’t crazy liberal. Charlie Strong worked out great for you. Enjoy being second fiddle in state to aTm.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News