re: Unpopular Opinion: Oklahoma has the best chance to win playoffs

You threw 14 passes in that game and ran the ball 44 times. That's "opening up the playbook"?

Keep trying. Baker Mayfield isn't a "thug" by any stretch of the imagination. That's just histrionic lunacy.

quote:

---

You threw 14 passes in that game and ran the ball 44 times. That's "opening up the playbook"?

---

9 straight runs on first down. We are winning 7-3.

The next 4 first downs are pass and we are winning 21-6.

Yes. We opened the playbook.

After that lead, we ran the ball 25 times to 2 passes for the remainder of the game.

Fromm is efficient on any down (2nd in the country in 3rd down efficiency). But the offensive line isn't efficient in 3rd and long. Passing on 1st down makes us a dangerous offense against playoff calibre teams (see the Auburn rematch).

Keep trying? I don’t have to? The video speaks for itself lol

quote:

---

None of what you're saying is relevant. Kentucky is not an important game. Here are the fricking statistics:

---

Kentucky is relevant in that it was after the first Auburn game (I think we ran the ball on first down 12 straight times in that first Auburb game).

quote:

---

Kerryon keeps Auburn's offense on the field exponentionally longer, and that means that your offense is less productive.

---

You don't understand the difference between efficient and productive. But what else is new when your closet is full of jorts.
Fromm was efficient against Auburns defense right when the rematch started. That keeps Auburns offense off the field. And like I said, Johnson doesn't play defense. The outcome of the UGA offense wasn't dependent on whether Auburn held the ball or not. We were good when we had the ball. I will take efficient every Saturday of the year. When we play running teams like Tech and Auburn every season, we have to be efficient.

quote:

---

The outcome of the UGA offense wasn't dependent on whether Auburn held the ball or not.

---

You guys are so, so delusional and downright don't understand football at a fundamental level.

Kerryon touching the ball 13 times vs. 32 times absolutely changes the outcome of a game.

You guys were more productive in the beginning of the game, but Auburn's inability to run the ball absolutely inhibited their offense.

It absolutely does change the way the game is played when you lose over 250 yards of offense, 6 minutes of TOP and your star player gets almost 20 touches less.

You thick frick.

quote:

---

You guys were more productive in the beginning of the game, but Auburn's inability to run the ball absolutely inhibited their offense.

---

You jump in on a conversation about Fromm (the UGA offense) and continue on about the Auburn offense as if it affects efficiency for UGA.

UGA had 5 first downs in the first half for 101 yards in the first game.

The rematch had 9 first downs for 161 yards for UGA.

And you want to continue on about how Kerryon Johnson affected the UGA's offensive efficiency more than the fact that UGA didn't run the ball on every single damn first down again like they did the first time around?

Google the difference between efficiency and productivity before you decide to add more to the conversation. UGA converting it's own first downs when it has the ball is irrelevant to the auburn offensive personnel.

quote:

---

No one in America can name 1 player on Georgia

---

Nick Chubb.

Outside of the clown you got at QB, I can't name any other Oklahoma player.

quote:

---

I gotta check out of the thread if you guys are actually arguing that Kerryon didn't matter because you're either drunk and have no idea what you're talking about, or you're retarded.

---

Yeah... someone might actually be drunk, retarded, or clueless. If you look hard enough and can't find them, you might find the answer in a mirror.

Better playcalling for UGA on the offensive side of the ball along with better play from the OL led to a more successful outing.

No one is arguing that W/L had no relationship to KJ's status that I can tell... if you want to somehow extrapolate that because their offense sucked their defense somehow sucked as well, then why was this not a valid excuse in the prior matchup when we struggled to move the ball? Regardless of the reason for the offensive struggles, we were told for weeks that it was simply because their OL dominated at the LOS, not because our defense was tired. Even if you eliminate the big run from Swift late in the game, we still more than tripled our YPC running the ball from the first matchup (quadrupled if included). Less predictable playcalling is a wondrous thing... But by all means... continue to cling to some desperate hope that UGA is a mirage and that great success awaits you with Mullen's upcoming classes full of 2-3* athletes. How's that Corral commitment holding up?

Ultimately, no one is saying that Kerryon playing doesn't change the outcome of the game... but what it doesn't do is change what UGA does on the offensive side of the ball... Kerryon doesn't play defense. This can't be disputed. We didn't turn the ball over this time... they did... twice. If you want to blame Kerryon's fumble on his injury, by all means go for it... you just look stupid.

quote:

---

Kerryon doesn't play defense.

---

You guys are killin' me by saying this because it's ignoring the obvious problem.

Georgia didn't do shite for a whole 3 quarters -- the game was 7 - 13.

The missed production from Kerryon absolutely would have improved Auburn's odds in the first three quarters.

There was no scheme change! Auburn moved the ball and couldn't punch it into the end zone because their best goddamn player was hurt.

frick you guys are so delusional. 13 - 7 going into the fourth quarter and you think KB doesn't change any point of the game from TOP, First Downs and the general flow of their offense.