Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 5/11/15 at 8:32 pm to CosmicGas93361
Posted on 5/11/15 at 8:32 pm to CosmicGas93361
None of that means we like you.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 8:35 pm to Prof
You are a dumbass if you think adding Baylor or TCU in place of TAMU would have produced the same results.
tu, yes, but not a small private school(s).
tu, yes, but not a small private school(s).
Posted on 5/11/15 at 8:56 pm to cardboardboxer
Frick you & the shitty sec network(ESPN sequel). Their programming sucks as bad or worse than the flagship network.
If it wasn't about the damn money they could've stayed at 12 teams and left the whole damn thing alone.
If it wasn't about the damn money they could've stayed at 12 teams and left the whole damn thing alone.

Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:10 pm to Prof
quote:
TAMU certainly helped expand the launch footprint as did Mizzou but the idea of an SEC Network had been around for years and the conference watched several others succeed and fail while waiting for our own tv contracts to expire.
The state of Texas has more people than the rest of the SEC West combined. Sorry. The SEC Network doesn't happen without our cable households.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:12 pm to Jenar Boy
quote:
If it wasn't about the damn money then could've stayed at 12 teams and fallen behind every Power 5 conference in both faculties and exposure.
Fixed
Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:14 pm to CosmicGas93361
SWC posse....my brothers.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:18 pm to CosmicGas93361
Deep down in places they don't talk about they're thanking us for financial relevancy.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:23 pm to CosmicGas93361
Lot of cowboys and sod busters have gotten to see A&M be LSU's whipping boy.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 9:34 pm to CosmicGas93361
11 green arrows .... all aggies.
lulz
lulz
Posted on 5/11/15 at 10:09 pm to CosmicGas93361
Guess we'll tolerate all the weird shite for SEC Network.
Texas, TCU or Oklahoma would have been better though.

Texas, TCU or Oklahoma would have been better though.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 10:11 pm to Pavoloco83
you think we like you guys either?
if it werent for the money, we sure as shite wouldnt want to be in the SEC

if it werent for the money, we sure as shite wouldnt want to be in the SEC
This post was edited on 5/11/15 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 5/11/15 at 10:15 pm to WestCoastAg
B1G has close to the same money, a much better academic reputation, and nearly the same network distribution. Plus they invented the conference network and weren't the pussies that followed along when the water was warm. I wouldn't blame Mizzou for going, almost wish we were Yankees.
Not
Not
Posted on 5/11/15 at 10:31 pm to TexAgChill
quote:
Deep down in places they don't talk about they're thanking us for financial relevancy
And with all this SEC Network $$$ some of yall still really believe LSU is about to shut its doors

Posted on 5/11/15 at 10:59 pm to Pavoloco83
Who cares if we don't like you or you don't like us. This is not a marriage, it's business. Come on, get with the program.


Posted on 5/11/15 at 11:08 pm to Dlab2013
quote:
with all this SEC Network $$$ some of yall still really believe LSU is about to shut its doors

Posted on 5/11/15 at 11:10 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
West: $220,987,200 (A&M owns 61% of that )
Boom.
Posted on 5/11/15 at 11:33 pm to knight_ryder
Just imagine if all the illegal immigrants in Texas had their own cable subscription............12 people sharing a trailer is killing the real numbers potential!! 

Posted on 5/12/15 at 7:49 am to cardboardboxer
Cousin the SEC had won 6 BCS national championships in a row the year that y'all were invited into the league. I'm pretty sure that they didn't need any help from y'all with exposure but you keep right on telling yourself whatever you need to to make y'all feel relevant.
Like you said earlier, it was about yalls Texas dollars and that's all it was about. End of the story.

Like you said earlier, it was about yalls Texas dollars and that's all it was about. End of the story.
Popular
Back to top
