Started By
Message
4
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:38 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Trent Richardson is not better than Michael Dyer.
The whole country disagrees with this.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TheCaterpillar
WR - Hunter above all others
QB - Bray
QB - Bray
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Bama fans, why exactly is Trent Richardson better than Mike Dyer? Alabama's got one of the best Olines in the nation, Dyer's running behind a bunch of new guys and they have basically even production.
Bama fans, i got this one.
Dyer is a very good back, very good. But he runs in a spread offense that utilizes him against 5-6 man fronts. Richardson, who i think is the most complete back since A. Peterson, runs inside and downhill against 7-9 man fronts. Even when you know he is coming, more often, you can not stop him. I do not think Dyer is on that level but i would deff put him at # 2 (active; Lat & Nile).
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
TheCheshireHog
Even if you averaged out his production to even Orson's catches, he still wouldn't have as many yards. And of course, the substantial touchdown disparity.
When you have yalls receivers though I'm not surprised he doesn't get more attention.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
K - Walsh
Appreciate it, but not this year man. He's having the worst season of his career and to be honest, has kinda sucked.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
K - Walsh
He's having a shitty year.
ETA = Thinking of the wrong guy when I said the OM kicker.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
K - Walsh
Walsh is garbage this year, Sturgis from Uf leads the nation in FG percentage...
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:40 pm to Aman
quote:
Trent Richardson is not better than Michael Dyer.
The whole country disagrees with this.
Everyone is the world with eyeballs outside of Auburn disagrees with this.
Richardson is fricking special. Dyer is just another really good SEC RB in a long, long line of them.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:40 pm to TheCaterpillar
With them being injured I can see why he would not include them. I believe Hunter for sure is the best WR in the league and Bray statistically is the best QB in the league, but they need to stay healthy like these other guys to prove it.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:40 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
K - Walsh
Walsh is garbage this year, Sturgis from Uf leads the nation in FG percentage...
I actually just assumed he was the best without looking. I'll edit.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:41 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Even if you averaged out his production to even Orson's catches, he still wouldn't have as many yards. And of course, the substantial touchdown disparity.
When you have yalls receivers though I'm not surprised he doesn't get more attention.
Oh yeah, he definitely isn't on Charles level yet. I was trying to say that I think even Gragg is better than Lutz.
Wilson has started getting him the ball more the last 3 weeks. He wsa hardly thrown to at all in the beginning of the season.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:41 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
an offense that can't figure out the forward pass and basically runs against a stacked box every time he touches the ball
Again, Bama fans, i got this.
Did you not watch the LSU game this weekend? We stacked the box every play. AJ is not a good QB. And TR did what he does. How did Dyer do in the same situation with LSU?
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:42 pm to TheCheshireHog
K- Bama's 2 kickers
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:42 pm to TheCheshireHog
Bamas LB's are pretty sensational but I don't know which is the best.
I think Moseley definitely has the best pro career though.
I think Moseley definitely has the best pro career though.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:48 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
I think Moseley definitely has the best pro career though.
He's special, like Rolando McClain special. Not many 34 ILBs can play any scheme other than the 34, but Mosley is an exception. He could be a star in a Tampa 2 or any other 43 D.
He's got the coverage skills of a DB, but the body and power of a LB...
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:48 pm to WG_Dawg
I'm not saying Lutz is a better receiver than Charles, but once again I'm asking myself, "Is he even worth a shite at blocking?" I asked it a few weeks ago and no one answered and now I'm asking it again. The TE position is a hybrid between the two. All I've ever seen is Charles go out for passing routes in the TE positon or when he's flexed out in the slot position.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:51 pm to sugatowng
quote:
QB - Murry/Wilson
RB - Trent Richardson
WR - Jarius Wright/Rogers/Randle
DL - LSU front 4
LB - Upshaw/Trevathan(sp)
CB - Claiborne/Banks
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:51 pm to plazadweller
Yeah he's worth a shite, but in our passing game he is more of a receiver. Unless someone posts stats to backup how they compare blocking, all we have to go on to compare the two is the hard data that I already posted, and that favors Orson by a wide margin. It's like the bama fans who were convinced Julio was better than AJ even when AJ had better stats all across the board simply because "he's a better blocker".
If a TE does nothing but block all the time and catches a redzone TD every once in a while, why should he be considered better than the TE who has much better stats and doesn't block as much?
If a TE does nothing but block all the time and catches a redzone TD every once in a while, why should he be considered better than the TE who has much better stats and doesn't block as much?
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:55 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
block all the time and catches a redzone TD every once in a while
You pretty much described verbatim the TE position.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 3:57 pm
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News