Started By
Message
re: To SC fans, historically what has kept you behind Clemson...
Posted on 6/19/18 at 10:55 am to GlossuRabban
Posted on 6/19/18 at 10:55 am to GlossuRabban
ok this topic isn't about you or me. you rarely post on topic.
if you want to post negative stuff about me, then start a new topic about me on SEC OT.
if you want to post negative stuff about me, then start a new topic about me on SEC OT.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:12 am
2
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:07 am to Tillman
Tillman it's time to log off for a while, this isn't going well
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:12 am to Tillman
quote:
if you want to post negative stuff about me,then start a new topic about me on SEC OT
I'll post wherever I want. If I choose to associate myself with a well known racist, feel free to do the same.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:13 am to GlossuRabban
Ok.
I'll note one more time that you and others on here can not specify the segregation policies of the GOP platform despite referring to me as stupid.
If the two parties mutually agreed to switch platforms, it seems like the GOP would have a segregation platform today.
I'll note one more time that you and others on here can not specify the segregation policies of the GOP platform despite referring to me as stupid.
If the two parties mutually agreed to switch platforms, it seems like the GOP would have a segregation platform today.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:15 am
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:21 am to Tillman
quote:
Tillman
I haven't read the thread, but are people attacking you on here because your username is the name of one of the biggest racists in the history of the state of South Carolina?
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:23 am to GetCocky11
No, they are attacking me because Clemson is better in football and/or they are Democrats.
The more success Clemson has in football and sports in general, the more fans of rivals talk about Tillman.
The more success Clemson has in football and sports in general, the more fans of rivals talk about Tillman.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:26 am
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:33 am to Tillman
So according to Tillman logic, they could change the name of the building to Hitler hall and that would NOT be racist....
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:35 am to GetCocky11
Did everyone on the board know that Ben Tillman's nephew killed the owner and editor of The State newspaper in broad daylight? The crime you ask? The paper had insulted Ben Tillman and his nephew's political platform.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:39 am to Lonnie Utah
Hitler didn't push for a separate agricultural college in SC....Tillman did.
I don't think anybody associated with Clemson today had anything to do with the naming of Tillman Hall. lol
I don't think anybody associated with Clemson today had anything to do with the naming of Tillman Hall. lol
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:42 am
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:42 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Did everyone on the board know that Ben Tillman's nephew killed the owner and editor of The State newspaper in broad daylight?
No, didn't know that. What a role model!
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:43 am to SCLibertarian
Didn't you assert that Clemson only focuses on football while SC focuses on every sport?
If so, why has Clemson won 10 out of last 14 in basketball against SC. 4 baseball series in a row against SC.
3 soccer matches in a row against SC.
If so, why has Clemson won 10 out of last 14 in basketball against SC. 4 baseball series in a row against SC.
3 soccer matches in a row against SC.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:44 am
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:48 am to Tillman
quote:
3 soccer matches in a row against SC.
If you're going to bring soccer into this, might as well bring up all the other non-revenue sports that no one gives a damn about...
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:49 am to 2014cock
lol, you are helping me to make my point.
If CLemson spends money and has success in a non-revenue sport...
I'm just trying to understand why he thinks Clemson doesn't focus on any sport other than football.
CLemson has spent a ton of money on the basketball arena and baseball stadium. The baseball stadium is often on top 10 college baseball stadium lists.
By the way, most college baseball programs don't make money including SC and Clemson despite being top 10 in attendance every year. lol
If CLemson spends money and has success in a non-revenue sport...
I'm just trying to understand why he thinks Clemson doesn't focus on any sport other than football.
CLemson has spent a ton of money on the basketball arena and baseball stadium. The baseball stadium is often on top 10 college baseball stadium lists.
By the way, most college baseball programs don't make money including SC and Clemson despite being top 10 in attendance every year. lol
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:56 am
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:49 am to Tillman
Wow. Now I just feel sad for this guy. It's like watching the 8th grade fatso picking on an especially slow 3rd grader on the school bus.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:57 am to Tillman
quote:
Business Insider says SC is no. 18 in sports related revenue. Clemson didn't make their list.
You're about 18 mil less than us.
LINK
I would guess you put a higher percentage into football than we do. Or used to I don't know.
I think it's completely BS IMO.
WE should be treating our Athletic Dept like Bama does.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:59 am to Tillman
quote:
didn't push for a separate agricultural college in SC....Tillman did.
So you're an ag school?
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:59 am to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
would guess you put a higher percentage into football than we do. Or used to I don't know.
Why do you say this?
Posted on 6/19/18 at 12:00 pm to I Bleed Garnet
it started that way.
It has an ag college but doesn't make sense to call a comprehensive university an ag school.
It has an ag college but doesn't make sense to call a comprehensive university an ag school.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 12:01 pm to Tillman
quote:
m just trying to understand why he thinks Clemson doesn't focus on any sport other than football.
never said that.
I said you put more money into than we do.
If you get what I mean.
Posted on 6/19/18 at 12:02 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Ok....I don't see what your basis for that is.
I assume you think that because of CLemson's recent success getting to the playoff.
If SC has more revenue than Clemson, it seems probable they spend more on football than Clemson. lol
I assume you think that because of CLemson's recent success getting to the playoff.
If SC has more revenue than Clemson, it seems probable they spend more on football than Clemson. lol
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 12:03 pm
Page 17 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News