Started By
Message
re: Tiers in the SEC-2000-2010
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:31 pm to gatordmb89
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:31 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
F had a few more down years thrown in their under the Zooker as well
no one outside of the league even remembers that. Happens to everyone
1
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:31 pm to Elleshoe
I sense sarcasm. 
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:32 pm to gatordmb89
I wanted to see a healthy Colt McCoy against Bama
that game would have been epic!!!
Shame!
that game would have been epic!!!
Shame!
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:32 pm to Elleshoe
Well, I'll admit it because I'm a realist. That's why when people start the LSU v. UF argument for better decade I just call it a push. We had 1 more SECC and the same amount of NC, but UF had way more shitty years.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:32 pm to ApexTiger
Oops
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:33 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
I sense sarcasm
no, I'm bring serious. no one fricking remembers Zook was even UF's coach outside of the league. People remember greatness and forget mediocrity. When I think Florida I think the Tebow says and Spurrier
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:35 pm to Elleshoe
My sarcasm reference was to your Patriot statement. 
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:37 pm to GambitAUfan
accurate imo for those years
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:44 pm to Moustache
quote:
1. UF
1 Bama
1 LSU
2. UGA
2. Auburn
2. Tennessee
3. Arky
3. USC
4. Ole Miss
4. MSU
4. UK
5. Vandy
Lets see... Auburn has 3 SECCG appearances, 2 SEC Championships, and 1 BCS Championship in that period. bammer has 2 SECCG appearances, 1 SEC Championship, and 1 BCS Championship in that same period.
So, using OBJECTIVE criteria, why would Auburn be Tier 2 but bammer Tier 1? Auburn as Tier 2 is a fair judgement compared to the championships both LSU and UF won in 2000-2010... but NOT if bammer is somehow Tier 1.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 6:47 pm to beatbammer
Because when he started the thread, he did not specify 2000-2010
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:01 pm to beaverfever
quote:
No way you can say Bama>Barn in the 2000's. I'd say it's a push at best.
How could it be a push when Auburn has more championships than they do in that period? As well as more undefeated seasons?
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:03 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
Everyone knows Lord Saban hoisted the trophy in 2003
The #1 thing they remember about 2003 is that USC got left out.
quote:
and dipshit did it in 2007
And that LSU was the worst, least deserving champion since the game's inception.
I don't care what people remember about Auburn in 2004, that was the most dominant team in the SEC this decade and in the immortal words of Herm Edwards "YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME".
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:05 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
but UF had way more shitty years.
Really? Were you guys that bad under Zook? LSU was not very good in 2000, 2002, 2008, 2009.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:06 pm to AUTigLN11
And just who the hell was more deserving in 2007? If I recall correctly, every team had 2 losses or more that year. Who deserved it more than LSU? Who was better than them?
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:10 pm to bamaboy87
If it wasnt for Auburns 2004 season the SEC would not have been in the driver seat for the NC every year.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:12 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
And just who the hell was more deserving in 2007? If I recall correctly, every team had 2 losses or more that year. Who deserved it more than LSU? Who was better than them?
That's the whole point, nobody just "deserves" to be put in the game. Especially not a team that has two terrible losses. That's why the BCS is bullshite. You can't just arbitrarily throw two teams in the game out of a collection of teams with the same records when all you have is random bias and often uneducated opinions to differentiate between them. I certainly have infinite more amount of respect for a team that wins all of its game than a team that loses, especially when they lose multiple times to very average teams. Even more especially when one of those losses is at home in the last game of the season.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:12 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Because when he started the thread, he did not specify 2000-2010
True, but he did not change his post when he changed his subject... so I assumed he meant that the post was still accurate for that time period in his opinion.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:13 pm to ApexTiger
quote:As a fan of a team not mentioned above, I actually agree. There is a large division between these 6 teams and the bottom 6 as far as success goes.
When I think of the SEC, I think of these schools first.
LSU, Alabama, Auburn, UF, UT and UGA
These 6 schools are the foundation of the SEC.
In my mind, all other schools are 2nd tier
Fair? Well, it's true...just the way it is..
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:13 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
If it wasnt for Auburns 2004 season the SEC would not have been in the driver seat for the NC every year.
FACT.
Posted on 1/17/11 at 7:15 pm to beatbammer
Maybe we should claim UF (2) and LSU (1)championships!
Page 8 of 11
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News