Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on Mizzou-Georgia

Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:44 am to
Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:44 am to
quote:

I don't see what a good defense has to do with doing gimmicks like a wildcat to start the game. Snap the ball into your leaders hands on the first play of conference play. That was terrible.


The wildcat was to give a look so the defense would have to be aware of that possibility.

The snaps sucked. The coaching staff adjusted and fixed the issue.

quote:

I don't see what a good defense has to do with calling a fake punt run on 4th and 11.


Me either brother. Me either.

quote:

Or continuing to try to pass to the outside when slants over the middle is what was working.


The middle wasn't open man. UGA shut that shite down tight and forced us to work the outside on island man coverage. That falls mostly on our WR not beating the UGA DBs and get separation.

quote:

And I don't get holding KLawerence back so much, he should have had way more touches.


Maybe. I suspect that they were ale to shut down our running game with a simple 4 man look pushed Yost to try and push things outside.

quote:

I don't get what a good defense has to do with running multiple series in a row without putting a RB in the backfield.


i think your statement answered your own question.



Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:44 am to
quote:

trolls gonna troll


Dead serious, who other than Kentucky do you think Missouri has a chance of beating?


At South Carolina? No

Vs Vanderbilt? This isn't old Vandy, the real James Franklin will prove that.

Vs Alabama? Prepare thy anus

At Florida? No

At Tennessee? Bray will rape that secondary

At Texas A&M? Maybe
This post was edited on 9/9/12 at 1:46 am
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:49 am to
quote:

1. the teams were evenly matched. uga made a couple more plays that turned the tide.
2.mizzous D was very active and aggressive. they held their own.
3.the atmosphere and crowd were great. if the old folks weren't contributing it didnt show. but every stadium's noise level varies by game and situation. uga's crowd can be very loud or very passive.
4. doubt if injuries were straight up faked, but may have been milked for all they were worth. faking injuries to gain rest would be bush.
5. the sec is tough but the big 12 wasnt chop suey. mizzou is more than ready to compete. middle of the pack maybe, but right now it's bama, lsu then everybody else, anyway.
6. the unis are bad but nothing beats that shite uga wore vs. boise last year



Classy post. Too much credit saying the teams were evenly matched, but thanks.

I shouldn't have gotten on here until I cooled off more..
Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:50 am to
quote:

Broski



Kentucky:Win
USCe: Loss
Vandy: Win
Bama: Loss
Florida: Toss
Tenn: Toss
aTm: Toss
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 1:55 am to
quote:

Vandy: Win


Vandy has a great defense, but a shite offense. Mizzou has a shite defense and a mediocre offense. I think the team with the great defense has the edge.

This is not the same whipping boy Vandy.


quote:

Florida: Toss


Florida is Georgia except they don't really have a QB right now. They win by 10.

quote:

Tenn: Toss


As I said, Bray will tear your weak secondary apart.
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:01 am to
Sorry to this Broksi guy, but you should try watching games, not just checking the score.

Georgia was the better team and won.

But, try checking the comments from GA fans. They know our defense was actually good tonight, despite giving up 41 points.

A few of their tds came on a short field. Our defense held its own, you didn't watch the game. GA made a few key great plays on offense, other than that the defense played well.
This post was edited on 9/9/12 at 2:02 am
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:02 am to
quote:

They know our defense was actually good tonight, despite giving up 41 points





Lost all credibility right there.


quote:

you didn't watch the game.


Because you can accurately make this claim, right?
This post was edited on 9/9/12 at 2:03 am
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86853 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:04 am to
quote:

Vandy has a great defense, but a shite offense. Mizzou has a shite defense and a mediocre offense. I think the team with the great defense has the edge.


Mizzou has a good offense. UGA is just a better team right now.
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:05 am to
quote:

Because you can accurately make this claim, right?


Yeah I can, you didn't watch the whole game. If you did and still feel the way you do then you have no credibility on football. Offensive mistake and poor coaching decisions (while on offense) caused a lot of the points we gave up. The better team won, but I'm just saying the defense was not the reason.
This post was edited on 9/9/12 at 2:09 am
Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:06 am to
quote:

Broski


What a bunch of emotional BS.
quote:

Vandy has a great defense, but a shite offense. Mizzou has a shite defense and a mediocre offense. I think the team with the great defense has the edge.



Mizzou doesnt have a "shite" defense.
quote:

Florida is Georgia except they don't really have a QB right now. They win by 10.


Florida and Georgia are the same? You live in an alternate reality.

Holy shite.

Im tired of Tenn smack. I have the felling the rest of the SEC is tired of their BS as well.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:08 am to
quote:

Yeah I can, you didn't watch the whole game. If you did and still feel the way you do then you have no credibility on football. Offensive mistake and poor coaching decisions (while on offense) caused a lot of the points we gave up. The better team won, but I'm just saying the defense was not the reason.


You are not helping your case at all with your whining. To swear that someone didn't watch the game because they have a differing opinion from what you, a biased Mizzou fan, saw is just pathetic on so many levels.

You guys have a long way to go to even think about competing in this conference. You can tell just by watching the two teams standing next to each other, UGA was so much bigger yet they were faster too.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51202 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:11 am to
quote:

Im tired of Tenn smack.

comprendo kimobabe, but methinks they are for real this year.

Other than that, I think your predictions make alot of sense.
Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:11 am to
quote:

You are not helping your case at all with your whining. To swear that someone didn't watch the game because they have a differing opinion from what you, a biased Mizzou fan, saw is just pathetic on so many levels.

You guys have a long way to go to even think about competing in this conference. You can tell just by watching the two teams standing next to each other, UGA was so much bigger yet they were faster too.


Let me translate for you:

I didnt watch shite. I have no idea how good Mizzou is on either side of the ball. I have only one thing to say:

SEC STACCCKKKEEEDDD
MIZZOU FFFUUCCKKKEDD.

Did I get it right?

Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:12 am to
quote:

kilo


Tell you what, want to set up a ban bet?
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:13 am to
quote:

quote:
Yeah I can, you didn't watch the whole game. If you did and still feel the way you do then you have no credibility on football. Offensive mistake and poor coaching decisions (while on offense) caused a lot of the points we gave up. The better team won, but I'm just saying the defense was not the reason.


You are not helping your case at all with your whining. To swear that someone didn't watch the game because they have a differing opinion from what you, a biased Mizzou fan, saw is just pathetic on so many levels.

You guys have a long way to go to even think about competing in this conference. You can tell just by watching the two teams standing next to each other, UGA was so much bigger yet they were faster too.



There is absolutely no whining there. And no you didn't watch the game, its obvious.

Our offense gave them the ball multiple times with a short field, twice in the red zone. Another time just outside red zone. Thats 21 points.
Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:13 am to
quote:

but methinks they are for real this year


Yea, they looked good.

We have a split right down the center of our family between Mizzou and Tennessee.



Posted by kilo
Suck Our Yankee
Member since Oct 2011
28534 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:14 am to
quote:

Tell you what, want to set up a ban bet?


Lets hear the terms.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:14 am to
quote:

mograyback


You can join the ban bet, too.

If Mizzou beats any other SEC team besides Kentucky, I'll get off the SEC Rant until the next football season.

But if they go 1-7, you guys bail.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51202 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:15 am to
quote:

Broski

Were you born a dick, or is it some type of evolution?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76869 posts
Posted on 9/9/12 at 2:15 am to
quote:

There is absolutely no whining there. And no you didn't watch the game, its obvious.


Keep telling yourself that with the black and yellow glasses on bro.

You guys aren't SEC caliber.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter