Started By
Message
re: The Road to 15
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:22 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:22 pm to diddydirtyAubie
You're dismissed. Your seat at the stupidass table is waiting.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
You're dismissed. Your seat at the stupidass table is waiting.
I'm trying to have a civil discussion and you're resorting to name calling.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:25 pm to Alahunter
God make it stop. Why claim bullshite titles. Atleast drop '41
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:25 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Why is this argument still going on? 12, 13, 14, 9, 10? Alabama still has more than anyone else.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:26 pm to diddydirtyAubie
No, you're throwing out the Auburn family talking points. It's been posted ad nauseum on here where Bama was crowned National Champs by papers of the day back when they went undefeated and won the Rose Bowl back in the 20's and 30's.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:26 pm to Rickdaddy4188
I have NO problem dropping 41 and replacing it with 45 or 66. 

Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:26 pm to Alahunter
quote:
No, you're throwing out the Auburn family talking points.
No...I posted what the World Wide Leader of Sports thinks.
This post was edited on 2/23/12 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:27 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Bench is getting lonely.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:29 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
some Bama grad putting it in a book =/= crowning National Champions.
Exactly. A rose bowl win is just that, a rose bowl win. A rose bowl win in 1924 somehow becomes a title in 1984
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:31 pm to Alahunter
quote:
I have NO problem dropping 41 and replacing it with 45 or 66.
Replacing it? You finished 3 in the sec in 41. All undefeated season aren't titles.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:31 pm to theGarnetWay
Spurrier is glad he run that fricker off as well 

Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:32 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Regardless of what you think about the Rose Bowl teams of the 20s and 30s, or the fallacy that's 1941, I think it's pretty clear Alabama was hosed in 1966.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:33 pm to Alahunter
Why cant y'all just leave it at 9? It's still more than any other. Why embellish?
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:33 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Yes. Replacing it. Bama was crowned by pollsters in 1945. 1966 was a screwing and there is no denying it.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:34 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Because it's not an embellishment? Why do so many of you gobble down the Bleacher Report article put out by an Auburn fan?
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:34 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Teams get hosed all the time. Most people think LSU got hosed haveing to play Bama again after beating them at Bama. It's college football. Until a playoff teams will get screwed
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:37 pm to theGarnetWay
Spurrier is glad he run that fricker off as well 

Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:38 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Except yall didn't win when it counted. Bama did, other teams didn't that year. The screwing was a political one because of the civil rights movement at the time and the disdain for the south in general. They spent the 2 previous years trying to prevent Bama from getting awarded the NC. The third year, they finally said, frick it, we'll just award to teams with worse records.
Posted on 2/23/12 at 7:39 pm to Rickdaddy4188
How often does a two-time defending national champion, and undefeated at that, get overlooked?
Popular
Back to top
