Started By
Message

The Newton Rule?
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:48 am
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:48 am
LINK
NCAA discussing new legislation related to the Cam Newton situation.
NCAA discussing new legislation related to the Cam Newton situation.
This post was edited on 12/15/10 at 7:51 am
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:49 am to WDE24
but, but, but the precedent was set!!! 

Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:50 am to WDE24
frick Auburn.
Cheating POS program and University.
This year has stained your programs reputation. Id be raising hell if I were you guys.
Cheating POS program and University.
This year has stained your programs reputation. Id be raising hell if I were you guys.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:53 am to King
quote:
Cheating POS program and University.
This year has stained your programs reputation. Id be raising hell if I were you guys.
I think you missed this part:
quote:
There was no evidence that Auburn University had anything to do with that or the student-athlete had anything to do with that, and under the rules that exist today, he could play ball."
So... we cool.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:53 am to King
quote:
Emmert said. "There was no evidence that Auburn University had anything to do with that or the student-athlete had anything to do with that, and under the rules that exist today, he could play ball."
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:55 am to Foy
So, you are saying that no money changed hands?
You are a blind homer if you actually believe that.
You are a blind homer if you actually believe that.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:55 am to WDE24
Who the hell actually believes that Cam didn't know anything other than Auburn fans?
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:56 am to King
quote:
So, you are saying that no money changed hands?
You are a blind homer if you actually believe that.
Can I get a link on this?
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:57 am to WDE24
Cecil is happy, he's getting what he wants. And so is Cam, he's also getting what he wants. I'm just wondering what Auburn is gonna get after Cam and Cecil are both gone.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:58 am to spslayto
quote:The NCAA?
Who the hell actually believes that Cam didn't know anything other than Auburn fans?


Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:00 am to WDE24
quote:
The NCAA?
I don't think the NCAA actually believes this either--they just haven't proven it yet. So the prostitute didn't know about the pimp?

Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:01 am to spslayto
quote:Well, I suppose that will have to do. Either way, good news for AU.
they just haven't proven it yet.

Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:02 am to TenTex
quote:Sounds like nothing if the NCAA president is to be given any credibility. Not sure if he has discussed things with W&L or BlueTuna though.
I'm just wondering what Auburn is gonna get after Cam and Cecil are both gone.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:03 am to WDE24
Why aren't Auburn fans outraged at Cecil Newton? There has been a surprising lack of "anger" from Auburn fans towards Cecil, considering what he did could have very well made Cam have to sit, or Auburn vacate wins. Just because Auburn gets off free doesn't mean nobody did anything wrong. That's why I'm confused by the mass "ALL IN" support of the Newton family.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:04 am to WDE24
Question-If there was no wrong doing, why is the ncaa putting in a new bylaw to prevent it? 

Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:05 am to superman
quote:
Why aren't Auburn fans outraged at Cecil Newton? There has been a surprising lack of "anger" from Auburn fans towards Cecil, considering what he did could have very well made Cam have to sit, or Auburn vacate wins. Just because Auburn gets off free doesn't mean nobody did anything wrong. That's why I'm confused by the mass "ALL IN" support of the Newton family.
Do you guys still bring up Curtis Anderson?
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:06 am to superman
I think most AU fans are upset with what Cecil did and have condemned it. I have at least. He put AU and his son in a bad position. On the other hand, if he didn't eff things up at MSU by trying to get $, I don't think Cam would have ended up at AU, so there is a silver lining from my perspective.
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:06 am to Foy
auburn fans will say "you can't prove that Cam/Auburn knew anything about the money. Everyone else will say "you can't prove that Cam/Auburn didn't know anything about the money" And by the phrase innocent until proven guilty, auburn gets away with this. I still feel that it's going to blow up it just may take a little bit longer
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:07 am to bamanmemphis
No one has claimed there was no wrong doing in the entire situation, just that AU did nothing wrong and there is no proof that Cam knew about the wrong things Cecil did. Is that hard to understand?
Posted on 12/15/10 at 8:08 am to superman
quote:
That's why I'm confused by the mass "ALL IN" support of the Newton family.
Maybe because Auburn hasn't won a football National Title since the Eisenhower administration? Different story if Auburn were 8-4.
Back to top
