Started By
Message
re: The Most Awesome Thread about CamGate
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:23 am to prplhze2000
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:23 am to prplhze2000
Absolutely EPIC.
Just can't wait for the hammer to drop.
That iz all...
Just can't wait for the hammer to drop.
That iz all...
This post was edited on 11/19/10 at 3:25 am
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:47 am to DBG
quote:
they need to bring back The Wire for one more season and just remake this entire saga...it fits perfectly
THAT
Posted on 11/19/10 at 5:27 am to IronSaban
Absolutely EPIC.
Just can't wait for the hammer to drop.
That iz all...
supyo> hows the concussion doing?
Just can't wait for the hammer to drop.
That iz all...
supyo> hows the concussion doing?

Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:30 am to TutHillTiger
quote:
Prehaps now is a good time to talk about the indictement process and grand juries.
This is a good link:
Great info TutHill - I imagine the pipeline of info is going to slow for awhile, given the off week for AU, the attention span of most people, and the lids and gags being put on everyone regarding all of this.
What I plan to do is as information pops, arrests are made, and the process plays out, go back and look at how all of this relates to what was being bantered about on these boards. Should be fun.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:37 am to blueTunaTiger
We will look forward to the updates.
Auburn fans should be careful not to be lulled into a sense of false optimism at this point by the relative lack of news for the next few days or weeks. Things are perhaps at their most dangerous point for Auburn, since it is either make or break time in the investigation/indictment process.
Frankly the longer this takes for the powers that be to come out and publicly clear Auburn, the less optimistic I would be. Clearly there is much more than Cam's recruiting involved, and it is likely that Auburn football is something of a sideshow to the FBI's investigation of corruption and fraud on a large scale connected with Lowder and McGregor.
Regardless of the resolution with respect to Cam, the ongoing investigation of Lowder and McGregor will have implications for Auburn, hopefully good ones in the long run, allowing Auburn to get free of Lowder and McGregor and their cronies.
Auburn fans should be careful not to be lulled into a sense of false optimism at this point by the relative lack of news for the next few days or weeks. Things are perhaps at their most dangerous point for Auburn, since it is either make or break time in the investigation/indictment process.
Frankly the longer this takes for the powers that be to come out and publicly clear Auburn, the less optimistic I would be. Clearly there is much more than Cam's recruiting involved, and it is likely that Auburn football is something of a sideshow to the FBI's investigation of corruption and fraud on a large scale connected with Lowder and McGregor.
Regardless of the resolution with respect to Cam, the ongoing investigation of Lowder and McGregor will have implications for Auburn, hopefully good ones in the long run, allowing Auburn to get free of Lowder and McGregor and their cronies.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:45 am to tigerinridgeland
Yup. Problem for Auburn is the feds will usually sit on indictments for awhile.
Like the FBI is doing right now in jackson.
Like the FBI is doing right now in jackson.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:03 am to TutHillTiger
quote:
I just thought it might be a good times to talk about the indictment process.
where you taping your nose whilst typing this?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:19 am to joemuggs
So serious question. If Cam is found ineligible after the SECCG but before the BCSCG what happens?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:25 am to GhostofJackson
quote:I believe there are several ways the NCAA and BCS can enforce in this scenario, depending on the severity and how complicit Cam/Cecil/Aub coach(es) were in obtaining/funneling pay-to-play cash.
If Cam is found ineligible after the SECCG but before the BCSCG what happens?
Posted on 11/19/10 at 10:29 am to CovingtonTiger
quote:
I would see no difference in perhaps being declared to have a record of 1-11 or 2-10 if Cam doesn't play, versus 0-12 if he does play.
Well except for the fact that an institution of higher learning has somewhat of a responsibility to at least try and maintain a facade of integrity. This isn't the mob wondering "what dey really got on us."
Posted on 11/19/10 at 12:29 pm to SouthernTaz
quote:
Problem for Auburn is the feds will usually sit on indictments for awhile.
Not necessarily. Feds often indict first and cut deals later. They can always issue a superceding indictment if new information is found. With some of these crimes, you have statute of limitations issues, so you can't sit on the indictment forever.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 1:46 pm to Nick Papagorgio
This thread/story/situation is unreal. To all who have posted info, I say
Just posting to say I was part of it!
Oh, and

Just posting to say I was part of it!
Oh, and

Posted on 11/19/10 at 2:06 pm to Nick Papagorgio
quote:
Problem for Auburn is the feds will usually sit on indictments for awhile.
doesnt matter really
The NCAA can do what they want if they get enough info.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:02 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
So serious question. If Cam is found ineligible after the SECCG but before the BCSCG what happens?
My guess, and thats all it is is a guess, is that they won't do that. Either they'll get something done before the SECCG or they won't do anything till after the season. I predict that basically if cam is playing in the iron bowl (as it's starting to look very likely he will) then he will play out the season.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 3:59 pm to joemuggs
I found a link to blueTuna's thread on the Texas Tech scout board and have ready all 36 pages of it and all 74 pages of this one in the last 24 hours. I think my eyes are going to fall out of my head.
I'll give y'all a Big12/Texas Tech perspective (at least mine anyway) on what all this could mean.
As much as I would hate to see a whole University go down the crapper, if AU lost accreditation and was booted from the SEC and the SEC poach A&M from the B12 it would be the death of the B12. Tech and Ok. State people would be ecstatic. A&M has a giant boner for the SEC and they don't even bother trying to hide it. Plus they'd be another doormat for everyone in the SEC to beat up on.
The thing that scares me is the potential for Tuberville's involvement. From blueTuna's post it appears Tuberville kept his nose clean. But if not it would be another huge controversy at Tech about what to do about him. The last thing we need is more controversy to divide the fanbase, there's been enough of that over the last year.
Those are my two cents, and I want a damn certificate!
I'll give y'all a Big12/Texas Tech perspective (at least mine anyway) on what all this could mean.
As much as I would hate to see a whole University go down the crapper, if AU lost accreditation and was booted from the SEC and the SEC poach A&M from the B12 it would be the death of the B12. Tech and Ok. State people would be ecstatic. A&M has a giant boner for the SEC and they don't even bother trying to hide it. Plus they'd be another doormat for everyone in the SEC to beat up on.
The thing that scares me is the potential for Tuberville's involvement. From blueTuna's post it appears Tuberville kept his nose clean. But if not it would be another huge controversy at Tech about what to do about him. The last thing we need is more controversy to divide the fanbase, there's been enough of that over the last year.
Those are my two cents, and I want a damn certificate!
Posted on 11/19/10 at 4:05 pm to Crow Pie
Agree with you Crow Pie...
Signed,
Fan of Team with a loss to Team of alledged cheaters by 3 points
Fan of Team with a loss to Team with its only loss to a team of alledged cheaters
Fan of Team with a loss to Team with an upcoming loss to a team of alledged cheaters

Signed,
Fan of Team with a loss to Team of alledged cheaters by 3 points
Fan of Team with a loss to Team with its only loss to a team of alledged cheaters
Fan of Team with a loss to Team with an upcoming loss to a team of alledged cheaters

Posted on 11/19/10 at 4:31 pm to MsuDog80
I wonder how long the calm before the storm will last? Living in tornado alley I have seen it many times and this case looks to be there as of today. Somebody please pass the popcorn!!!
Posted on 11/19/10 at 8:34 pm to okie122470
We are in the lull period. Silence at this point is not comforting, but expected. If things are going to be bad for Auburn, silence is to be expected. At the point "no news" is not necessarily "good news." All the folks who are going to speak publicly about any involvement have spoken. We won't hear much more until either the hammer is dropped and the worst confirmed or there is an announcement that Auburn is in the clear. The longer the silence is and the more "no comments" one hears, the less comfortable I would be if I were an Auburn fan. For everyone's sake, I hope the silence breaks sooner rather than later.
Posted on 11/19/10 at 9:59 pm to tigerinridgeland
From BOL
CrimsonLawyer
BOL Hall of Famer
CrimsonLawyer
BOL Hall of Famer
quote:
Unwelcomed Info Re: Cam Situation
This won't be popular information, but it is still worth sharing. I spoke this morning to a friend who formerly worked for the NCAA prosecuting rule violation cases and is now the NCAA Compliance Director at a major university. He told me that in his opinion, it is very unlikely that Cam will be ruled ineligible if the only evidence uncovered is that his father solicited money for Cam's signature. People keep referring to the comments of the NCAA spokesperson last week, but if you look at her quote, while she does say it would be a violation, she never says such a violation would make the player ineligible. He believes that this will likely lead to a bright line rule to prevent this type of thing in the future, but doesn't think Cam will be adversely affected (assuming no more evidence is uncovered).
Again, I know this is not a popular statement, but I thought everyone should know that with what is out there to the public, Cam being declared ineligible is far from a slam dunk. The person who gave me this opinion knows far more about the NCAA rules and how the NCAA works than anyone on this board, or those giving opinions in the media. There are several people on here who know where this info comes from (Tim Watts is one of them), so you can be confident that I'm not just making stuff up.
Back to top
