Started By
Message
re: The media and casual fans narrative around the 3-3-5 defense?
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:32 pm to koreandawg
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:32 pm to koreandawg
I would put UGA OSU as more of a 50-50 toss up. Theres many ways you could you say UGA won and UGA lost the game and same for OSU. The Mich/TCU scenario is completely different.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:39 pm to td01241
quote:
I'm not going into his paywall to see what he claims is unique and innovative
Here's some free discussion on it.
"It's a very different take on the 3-3-5. The standard Rocky Long 3-3-5 you know uses a single-high safety and then two hybrid wings, then plays 3 and 3 in the box. This 3-3-5 is more of a 3-4 but one of the middle linebackers is a safety-like object in the middle of the safeties.
The idea is to start back and chain reactions of each level to the one in front of it. The big question people always ask is how do you stop the run if you're pulling the free hitter out of the box. The answer is you have the six or five or four guys left in the box (depending on offensive formation) react aggressively to the blocking with the Star making them good. This play against Oklahoma's arc read this year is a good example."
It's not the same link as before. You can read it all here.
Fly over defense
This post was edited on 1/7/23 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:45 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
I'll grant you that, but Michigan granted 14 points to TCU by going full retard
That's the point of the 3-3-5 scheme is to make a QB go full retard.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:48 pm to CharlotteSooner
I wasn't referring to McCarthy, I was referring to Michigan getting cute in the Red Zone twice
Back to top
