Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:51 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Kentucky is hardly ever good under anybody. That's the point.
Neither is Missouri.
Y'all had one good team in 2007 (?) and hardly anyone even noticed or cared. Story of your life.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:56 pm to CNB
GER DERS!
Vanderbilt, F*ck Yeah!
Vanderbilt, F*ck Yeah!
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:57 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Kentucky is hardly ever good under anybody.
Bear Bryant says hello.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:58 pm to Cheese Grits
I'm trying to figure out who is missing
Posted on 10/29/14 at 7:59 pm to Cheese Grits
And Rich Brooks, considering UK plays in the SEC. Probably would have been to a BCS bowl a couple of those years in another conference.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:02 pm to JesusQuintana
Neither team can brag about history. To be honest, both teams suck historically. But I feel good about winning on Saturday, and I feel confident that we will be consistently better that Missouri in the future.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:03 pm to Cheese Grits
Arkansas
Auburn
Tennessee
Kentucky
LSU
Missouri
Ole Miss
Texas A&M or Mississippi State ?
Vanderbilt
Florida
South Carolina
Georgia
Alabama
Texas A&M or Mississippi State = missing one
(probably TAMU as no milkmen, coveralls, or gay rainbow color)
Auburn
Tennessee
Kentucky
LSU
Missouri
Ole Miss
Texas A&M or Mississippi State ?
Vanderbilt
Florida
South Carolina
Georgia
Alabama
Texas A&M or Mississippi State = missing one
(probably TAMU as no milkmen, coveralls, or gay rainbow color)
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:26 pm to JD West
No, you suck historically. We are average-ish.
We are 35th all time in wins(d1 teams) 30th in bowl wins.
UK is 50th all time in wins and 59th in bowl wins
We have 1 less bowl win than you have total bowl games.
We have 15 conference titles to your 2. More all time draft picks, first rounders and all Americans, weeks ranked in the AP poll. Really, any measure you want to use. Those gaps are all wider when you consider recent history.
Historically, we are quite a bit better and recent history we have been pretty good and y'all have been terrible.
We are 35th all time in wins(d1 teams) 30th in bowl wins.
UK is 50th all time in wins and 59th in bowl wins
We have 1 less bowl win than you have total bowl games.
We have 15 conference titles to your 2. More all time draft picks, first rounders and all Americans, weeks ranked in the AP poll. Really, any measure you want to use. Those gaps are all wider when you consider recent history.
Historically, we are quite a bit better and recent history we have been pretty good and y'all have been terrible.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:31 pm to JesusQuintana
Y'all played in the worst division in a shite hole conference until two years ago. UK would have done the same in that conference, if not had more success. Mizzou is not a good program. Never has been.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:37 pm to thesoccerfanjax
Soccerfanwhatever, you are an idiot. End of discussion.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:39 pm to restore the roar
well....bye.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:42 pm to restore the roar
Soccerfan you might want to look at the Mizzou-Arkansas score in the Cotton Bowl that happened during that era. Might also want to look at Mizzou's win over #1 Oklahoma. Or Mizzou's wins over both Ole Miss and South Carolina during that period.
The team Kentucky had during that period would have lost to Mizzou by three TDs minimum.
That being said Kentucky very well may be better than Mizzou this year.
The team Kentucky had during that period would have lost to Mizzou by three TDs minimum.
That being said Kentucky very well may be better than Mizzou this year.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:44 pm to Miz-Stl
It's easy to get up for one game when you're not playing anyone all season. Mizzou was just lucky enough to play in a truly horrible conference all those years.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:46 pm to Miz-Stl
Stop biting.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:46 pm to Miz-Stl
quote:
The team Kentucky had during that period would have lost to Mizzou by three TDs minimum.
You mean like the UK team that beat the eventual national champions LSU? That UK team? And they would have lost to Missouri by three TDs? Is that what you're saying?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:46 pm to thesoccerfanjax
If you didn't secede from the Union you aren't truly Southern. So frick you Kentucky and Missouri.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:48 pm to DaveyDownerDawg
Kentucky actually did secede. Had two governments.
But, you're an idiot.
BTW. I'm born and raised in a NON southern state that DID secede (FL). So WGFAF.
But, you're an idiot.
BTW. I'm born and raised in a NON southern state that DID secede (FL). So WGFAF.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:54 pm to thesoccerfanjax
The Big 8 was every bit as good as the SEC, if not better, for many years.
Big 12 North? Yeah, the last few years it was down but for the majority of it's existence KState, Nebraska, And Colorado were good teams. Along with Mizzou.
I said we were an average program. Can you not read? UK is a shitty program though.
Big 12 North? Yeah, the last few years it was down but for the majority of it's existence KState, Nebraska, And Colorado were good teams. Along with Mizzou.
I said we were an average program. Can you not read? UK is a shitty program though.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:57 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
UK is a shitty program though.
So is Missouri. Agree to disagree.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News