Started By
Message
re: the FSU receiver caught the ball
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:29 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:29 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
the FSU receiver caught the ball
After he was out of bounds in the back of the end zone. I agree!
0
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:31 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
it was a TD
I agree 100% He controlled it with his fingertips for two clean steps in bounds. How does this rule even benefit football? They are looking to negate every good catch. Why?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:32 pm to metafour
quote:It didnt move for two solid steps in bounds.
The ball was clearly moving in his hands until he was well out of bounds
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:33 pm to billjamin
quote:
5
quote:There were literally 2 clean steps taken in bounds with possession. Either way its a terrible rule
Are you trolling or that blind?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:35 pm to Fomily
He objectively had 0 clean steps in bounds with control of the ball. Very easy reversal for the crew to make.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:35 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Your stupidity doesn't make it true, either.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:36 pm to Fomily
quote:
I agree 100% He controlled it with his fingertips for two clean steps in bounds. How does this rule even benefit football? They are looking to negate every good catch. Why?
Vegas and ESPN wants to control the outcomes
they have a bunch of fantasy football idiots on their side
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:36 pm to Fomily
quote:
I agree 100% He controlled it with his fingertips for two clean steps in bounds. How does this rule even benefit football? They are looking to negate every good catch. Why?
Why would the receiver feel the need to re-secure the ball if he has clean possession? If he hadn't done that, it would've stayed a catch.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:37 pm to Gings5
Would have been a catch 10/10 times. Like I said, horrible rule.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:37 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Complete transparency, they all agreed.... I saw it, you did too.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:38 pm to Gings5
quote:
He objectively had 0 clean steps in bounds with control of the ball.
absolute horse shite
you're a little jealous hyena because you never played the game
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:38 pm to tBrand
quote:Would have been a catch 10/10 times before this new "rule." Again, horrible rule.
If he hadn't done that, it would've stayed a catch.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:39 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
He caught the ball after he ran out of the endzone. He was bobbling it until then. Refs definitely got the call right. You obviously didn't watch the replay closely. There was air between his hands and the football after he stepped out. No catch.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:39 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
you're a little jealous hyena because you never played the game
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:39 pm to lewis and herschel
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:40 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
In my completely unbiased opinion it wasn't a catch. 
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:41 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:That doesn't make them right.
Complete transparency, they all agreed..
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:41 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
but the dude caught the ball.
About 3 times actually and neither time was it an actual catch.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:42 pm to GoGators1995
it was absolutely a catch
the game is being ruined by gambling and TV
have a great night
the game is being ruined by gambling and TV
have a great night
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:46 pm to A10Rebel
quote:
They don't consider that possession.
who is "they"?
the guys who never played the game?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News