Started By
Message
That's a catch by Toney, by rule.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:16 pm
Why does it matter how much time lapses between the toe and the heel coming down?
He got a toe down before the heel. Replay clearly shows it.
He got a toe down before the heel. Replay clearly shows it.
3
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:19 pm to Ironlung
Not even close
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:19 pm to Ironlung
never go full retard
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:20 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:It was close, and it was obvious toe was down before heel. If you disagree, you have a bias you can't overcome.
Not even close
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:21 pm to Ironlung
The announcers did a poor job explaining. If any part of the foot hits out of bounds, it’s out.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:22 pm to Ironlung
quote:
It was close, and it was obvious toe was down before heel. If you disagree, you have a bias you can't overcome.
The heel can’t land out at all, unless the toe comes off the ground after landing in bounds.
Can’t be the same step.
This is a known rule.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 10:24 pm to thenza
quote:That's actually not the rule. Here's how stupid the rule is.
The announcers did a poor job explaining. If any part of the foot hits out of bounds, it’s out.
If the receiver is going out of bounds backwards, and his toe comes down before the heel, it's considered a catch.
But if he's going out of backs forwards, and his heel comes down inbounds before the toe is out of bounds, it's considered incomplete.
The rules for what constitutes a catch are among the stupidest, most incomprehensible rules in all of sports.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News