Started By
Message
Texas NIL Narrative
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:14 pm
There is this dismissive narrative that is going around that the athletic success Texas has experienced the past few years is mainly due to NIL. While I can understand why that may be a universal assumption, it is a lazy portrayal of what actually contributes to sustainable athletic success. I also think there is some intentional deflection from those who wanted to see Texas struggle in the SEC, also understandable.
There are quite a few holes in this theory. NIL is a huge part of talent acquisition in 2025, though Texas has never lacked in the ability to attract top talent. From 2009 to 2022, Texas Football recruited a Top3 class 6 times, a Top5 class 8 times, and a Top10 class 10 times. Other major men’s sports also follow this trend of elite recruiting prowess. Another point of contrast is Texas was not an early adopter of NIL collectives. It really took time to develop the infrastructure. Texas took a back seat in the state of Texas the first 15 months or so to programs like Texas A&M, Oregon, Miami, etc. Sark’s program changing offensive line class was largely due to Cristobal leaving Oregon and dropping two NFL tackles into our lap. Another divergent data point is Texas has not historically been aggressive in the transfer portal. Many of the transfers to date have had an existing connection to the staff, and only a handful have been starter caliber players.
Texas has always had elite talent on campus. One thing they haven’t had until recently is stability at AD. Texas was cesspool of turnover in administration and coaching staffs for a decade. There was just no way they were ever going to be able to sustain success. You can say Texas squandered a ton of talent, for sure. To say they’re only relevant because they’re wealthy, that’s just lazy. The Aggies and Ducks would play in an annual national title if that were the case. Texas has solid coaches in nearly every facility on campus and their AD is probably the best in the business. They are very competitive in NIL today, but the roster composition dynamic is essentially the same as it was 10 years ago.
There are quite a few holes in this theory. NIL is a huge part of talent acquisition in 2025, though Texas has never lacked in the ability to attract top talent. From 2009 to 2022, Texas Football recruited a Top3 class 6 times, a Top5 class 8 times, and a Top10 class 10 times. Other major men’s sports also follow this trend of elite recruiting prowess. Another point of contrast is Texas was not an early adopter of NIL collectives. It really took time to develop the infrastructure. Texas took a back seat in the state of Texas the first 15 months or so to programs like Texas A&M, Oregon, Miami, etc. Sark’s program changing offensive line class was largely due to Cristobal leaving Oregon and dropping two NFL tackles into our lap. Another divergent data point is Texas has not historically been aggressive in the transfer portal. Many of the transfers to date have had an existing connection to the staff, and only a handful have been starter caliber players.
Texas has always had elite talent on campus. One thing they haven’t had until recently is stability at AD. Texas was cesspool of turnover in administration and coaching staffs for a decade. There was just no way they were ever going to be able to sustain success. You can say Texas squandered a ton of talent, for sure. To say they’re only relevant because they’re wealthy, that’s just lazy. The Aggies and Ducks would play in an annual national title if that were the case. Texas has solid coaches in nearly every facility on campus and their AD is probably the best in the business. They are very competitive in NIL today, but the roster composition dynamic is essentially the same as it was 10 years ago.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:18 pm to EastTXHorn
Didn’t read, but if you truly believe Sark went from 5-7 and 8-5 in his first two years to consecutive CFPs all because of “development”, I have a beautiful oceanfront property in Beaumont that you need to check out
Sark never even had a 10-win season on his resume until legalized pay-for-play



Sark never even had a 10-win season on his resume until legalized pay-for-play

Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:20 pm to EastTXHorn
Enjoy what's coming your way.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:22 pm to NFLSU
I suggest you look into the roster of the 2020 and 2021 teams. You’ll see many familiar faces on the depth chart of the playoff teams.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:24 pm to EastTXHorn
Thx for contributing and setting us all straight
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:29 pm to EastTXHorn
Texas went 7-3 in 2020, fired Tom Herman, just to bring in Stumbling Sark who promptly went 5-7 in 2021
It’s been a lot of fun watching UTrans fans try to convince themselves and everyone else that they always played strictly by the rules until 2023
“We have sooo much money”
…..
“We didn’t spend close to that much!!!”



It’s been a lot of fun watching UTrans fans try to convince themselves and everyone else that they always played strictly by the rules until 2023
“We have sooo much money”
…..
“We didn’t spend close to that much!!!”
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:30 pm to NFLSU
It’s funny to me that the region that threw around the most money pre-nil is the one who can’t keep their mouths shut about it. More SEC titles incoming.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:31 pm to EastTXHorn
I guess the boosters need to pay to fix the baseball stadium in time for tomorrow
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:33 pm to EastTXHorn
quote:
More SEC titles incoming
…in what? Regular season baseball?
Hell, Kentucky accomplished that feat just last year

Ask your local Arkansas fan what that’s ever done for them.
Whorns fans predicting the future again while denying they’re just like Aggy


Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:34 pm to EastTXHorn
You are making quality arguments (mostly) but I just don't think it's going to sell. When you have the best players on the field, it's hard to fail.
I don't even think Mr. Kick Six (Saban) was a coaching giant - but he had the best players. Until he didn't. Why did that happen? Because Texas "developed"?
In fact, I contend Texas could have been even better last year, as Sark made numerous gameday decisions that highlight his immaturity as a coach. Bush league "let's go for it" decisions among others things are about all Sark brings to the table. All else is brought by the money and the Texas brand.
I don't even think Mr. Kick Six (Saban) was a coaching giant - but he had the best players. Until he didn't. Why did that happen? Because Texas "developed"?
In fact, I contend Texas could have been even better last year, as Sark made numerous gameday decisions that highlight his immaturity as a coach. Bush league "let's go for it" decisions among others things are about all Sark brings to the table. All else is brought by the money and the Texas brand.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:37 pm to NFLSU
None of those teams have played for a SEC football title. A very winnable game by the way. Texas was unlucky enough to knock out the starter who threw for less than 50 yards.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:41 pm to EastTXHorn
quote:Historically, recruiting’s never been our issue. Eval/development misses (esp on the OL) were our undoing. Sark’s fixed that. The last piece missing is a killer mentality.
There is this dismissive narrative that is going around that the athletic success Texas has experienced the past few years is mainly due to NIL
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:43 pm to EastTXHorn
Didn’t read, but I just think Texas is actually starting to develop talent like the 2000s again.
You guys had all the talent in the world compared to the big 12, but got out coached by people like Gundy and Snyder.
Now with the talent plus competent coaching you can develop a culture again. You guys had a terrible culture the past decade compared to now. Reality is Texas has 0 excuse to not be a top school in basically every sport, anyone that’s from a Houston or DFW knows that. So you’ll get a lot of shite when you slip up.
You guys had all the talent in the world compared to the big 12, but got out coached by people like Gundy and Snyder.
Now with the talent plus competent coaching you can develop a culture again. You guys had a terrible culture the past decade compared to now. Reality is Texas has 0 excuse to not be a top school in basically every sport, anyone that’s from a Houston or DFW knows that. So you’ll get a lot of shite when you slip up.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:43 pm to BevoBucks
quote:
Eval/development misses (esp on the OL) were our undoing. Sark’s fixed that.
Nice. So all he needs to do is quit calling slow developing backwards lateral plays from the one-yard line in shotgun formation.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:58 pm to NFLSU
quote:
Didn’t read, but if you truly believe Sark went from 5-7 and 8-5 in his first two years to consecutive CFPs all because of “development”, I have a beautiful oceanfront property in Beaumont that you need to check out
Sark never even had a 10-win season on his resume until legalized pay-for-play
This is such a stupid, lazy reply. So, if a coach started with a bad first season and improved within 3 years it had to be due to NIL right?
Check Saban's year 1 to year 3.
Check Pete Carroll's record from 6-6 his first year to his 3rd year.
But it has to be only NIL right?
I can already hear you crying if TX wins a natty. "You guys bought a natty with NIL so it doesn't count"

Guess how much we will care?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:01 pm to TX Tea
quote:
Guess how much we will care?
Enough to post a Harry Potter novel like OP, obviously

Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:11 pm to NFLSU
It’s just annoying to read this nonsense constantly. The talent disparity was even more dramatic in the Big12, no one cared because we were constantly being outperformed by healthier athletics programs with superior coaching staffs. Saban is considered a great without asterisks even though he was tossing around six figure deals to kids in Houston.
Back to top
