Started By
Message
re: Texas - TAMU Rivalry
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:35 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:35 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:i feel you have a deflection-type answer to this loaded question in a tamu/texas thread.....proceed.
Also, why was LSU so afraid to play A&M in CS for decades?
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 9:36 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:40 am to dstone12
Y’all played in CS in 1922 and didn’t return until 1987. All regular season games between then were in Baton Rouge. Hmm...
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:42 am to dstone12
And y’all voted against an OOC game in 2020. Your opponent was...Texas. Hmm...
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:44 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:pardon me...but you asked why. I'm looking for some substance on the answer to your loaded question. You simply stated that they haven't.
Y’all played in CS in 1922 and didn’t return until 1987. All regular season games between then were in Baton Rouge. Hmm...
It could be that LSU is a perennial football program that wins national championships while in the SEC in multiple decades.
That's all I can assume until you give me an intelligent answer on your own question....why?. Not re-stating the question. Keep up 'metro-atlanta-gator'.
eta.....whoa. more substance needed on an additional claim that LSU voted to not play Texas. Some links would be nice.
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:47 am to dstone12
quote:
It could be that LSU is a perennial football program that wins national championships while in the SEC in multiple decades.
Y’all were on the same level as A&M during that period though. Hmm...
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:48 am to dstone12
Sorry I don’t camp out all day. You are wrong and just doing your normal shite trolling. Bookmark whatever you want, goober.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:51 am to Mr Sausage
quote:
Sorry I don’t camp out all day. You are wrong and just doing your normal shite trolling. Bookmark whatever you want, goober.
this sums up my conclusion just fine.
quote:
Sausage.
For just one response.... Without a neat meme or two sentences, try to take this issue head-on... Try to answer without having Balinese or Agressor INTERCEDE FOR YOU.(go look up the word INTERCEDE, if you need to)
Would you agree to that? Or do you want to re-inforce the FEAR answer I just settled, moments ago?
Would you be able to use an intelligent response without having anyone else answer for you and then you saying "right on"?
Agree?
without having any intelligence or wherewithal to take on an intellectual confrontation, you opt out.
That's clockwork.
o
u
c
h
Debate settled.
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 9:57 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 9:51 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:i have a feeling you want to say something but don't have links to support or to sack up and just say it......hmmmmmm.
Y’all were on the same level as A&M during that period though. Hmm...
sounds like Mr. Sausage to me.
i've got to have some substance from 'metroatlantagator'
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 9:56 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 10:15 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:and yet, the question has been asked for you to link or say it....you asked "WHY". Multiple times asking you this and you won't link or say.....hmmm.
Y’all played in CS in 1922 and didn’t return until 1987. All regular season games between then were in Baton Rouge. Hmm...
Posted on 5/15/21 at 10:29 am to Mr Sausage
Debate settled. Now we know. it’s been concluded that you are not able to carry on an intellectual convo when asked.
It’s impossible for you.
Clockwork.
It’s impossible for you.
Clockwork.
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 10:31 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 10:48 am to Mr Sausage
Irony
To have zero ability to go beyond one sentence and a meme. Unless prodded.
And even then it’s a crapshoot that your reply, beyond a sentence, would have any meaning or substance to it.
That equals a huge fear on your behalf to try to give an intellectual answer. Sad for you.
To have zero ability to go beyond one sentence and a meme. Unless prodded.
And even then it’s a crapshoot that your reply, beyond a sentence, would have any meaning or substance to it.
That equals a huge fear on your behalf to try to give an intellectual answer. Sad for you.
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 10:53 am
Posted on 5/15/21 at 10:51 am to dstone12
quote:
would have any meaning or substance to it.
That’s rich. Troll on, son.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:04 am to Mr Sausage
quote:well. I am correct. You’ve been trolling with just a sentence or two. But never actually able to provide any intelligent conversation.
That’s rich. Troll on, son
It’s definitely rich for you. True.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:06 am to dstone12
Ha ha. Ha. Intelligent conversation. You and that phrase are mutually exclusive. How funny.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:10 am to Mr Sausage
Oh….well yes.
Here but you’ve avoided it like the plague for a page or two to where you’ve proven to, even yourself, you’d rather not go up against me, my son.
Here but you’ve avoided it like the plague for a page or two to where you’ve proven to, even yourself, you’d rather not go up against me, my son.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:14 am to dstone12
Alright dstone12, let's take a different approach.
If you were in charge of A&M, would you bring back the game? If so, why?
If you were in charge of A&M, would you bring back the game? If so, why?
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:20 am to Bobby Jimbo
quote:First of all. How nice of you to save your retard friend sausage from further embarrassment.
If you were in charge of A&M, would you bring back the game? If so, why?
Second,
There is no need to overthink it. The sec East does it without a hitch.
Don’t worry about deloss, or Woodward or past losses.
Yes. Just play it. Or at least, your side should agree to play it.
Simple? Anything you want to add?
Posted on 5/15/21 at 11:21 am to TheRaginCajun
Maybe they are both ‘All hat, no cattle’?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News