Started By
Message
re: Some noteworthy Outback records set today
Posted on 1/2/10 at 8:58 am to WarEagleTwentyFour
Posted on 1/2/10 at 8:58 am to WarEagleTwentyFour
Roof is a good coach. His schemes have worked in the past and they'll work at Auburn once we get quality talent and depth
0
Posted on 1/2/10 at 9:55 am to tkane311
quote:Not really. We lost to the better team. No shame in that. I'm really not upset at all.
Nearly lost my voice screamin' for LSU yesterday. I know ya don't mean to, but it's pretty easy to see that your comments are painted by the loss. I hate it too, homes. There, there.
I m just offering an objective opinion. If you don't like it, cry about it or ignore it.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 9:56 am to WarEagleTwentyFour
quote:Take away those fumbles, then.
Auburn had the game in hand the whole time and had 2 fumbles with 3 minutes left
And while you're at it, take away Northwesterns INT's. . .
Who wins then?
Posted on 1/2/10 at 9:57 am to Roaad
Auburn is the poster child for what ifs. Started with Shug and will never go away.
This post was edited on 1/2/10 at 9:58 am
Posted on 1/2/10 at 9:59 am to Ross
quote:I'm not bitter towards Auburn, I have nearly forgotten what it's like to not win against AU. But your response is typical.
To say Northwestern deserved the win and Auburn did not is ludicrous as well and reeks of bitterness.
If someone gives an objective opinion regarding the game, they are butthurt/bitter/biased/etc. Face it, you guys slipped away with a win against a better team.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 10:48 am to Roaad
Let's flip around the tables. If Northwestern managed to score on that fake field goal, how on earth could you argue that they did not slip away with the win. I mean, it was a close game and both teams had oppurtunities, both teams had costly turnovers and penalties, and both teams kicked field goals. Sadly, kicking is part of a football game and because Northwestern has a poor field goal kicker one could argue it cost them the game
Your response is also typical, but it is typical of someone trying to belittle Auburn's win. That was a good game and to say that Auburn didn't deserve that win is, as I said before, simply ludicrous. I welcome objective opinions but you have made your opinion clear that you don't plan on giving Auburn due credit.
Your response is also typical, but it is typical of someone trying to belittle Auburn's win. That was a good game and to say that Auburn didn't deserve that win is, as I said before, simply ludicrous. I welcome objective opinions but you have made your opinion clear that you don't plan on giving Auburn due credit.
This post was edited on 1/2/10 at 10:53 am
Posted on 1/2/10 at 10:51 am to Schwaaz
quote:
and will never go away.
sort of like you Schwaaz
Posted on 1/2/10 at 10:55 am to Roaad
I could care less who had the better team. I wanted Auburn to win and they did.
As far as LSU goes, I wanted them to win too, but they didn't. I could care less who had the better team. All anyone really cares about is who won.
As far as LSU goes, I wanted them to win too, but they didn't. I could care less who had the better team. All anyone really cares about is who won.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 10:59 am to Roaad
quote:
Face it, you guys slipped away with a win
totally agree
quote:
against a better team.
Posted on 1/2/10 at 11:00 am to Roaad
quote:
Take away those fumbles, then.
And while you're at it, take away Northwesterns INT's. . .
Who wins then?
If we take away five interceptions from Kafka, and we get our fumbles back AND our two interceptions in the red zone back, we still win. 5 turnovers to 4 turnovers, and in both sets a few came in scoring position and a few came at a horrible time.
This post was edited on 1/2/10 at 11:01 am
Posted on 1/3/10 at 1:44 am to Roaad
quote:
Face it, you guys slipped away with a win against a better team.
That's bullshite and you know it.
Posted on 1/3/10 at 1:46 am to rbWarEagle
Objective- not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion.
You hate Auburn therefore you are biased.. meaning NOT OBJECTIVE.
You hate Auburn therefore you are biased.. meaning NOT OBJECTIVE.
Posted on 1/3/10 at 7:14 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Auburn was the better team on the field, as far as talent.
Now, coaching, effort, intangibles NW was superior. Auburn should have ran their arse in the ground and couldn't do it. NW wouldn't quit.
Our offense has been plagued all season by being a hot and cold offense in the same game. We come out hot go cold in the 2nd quarter typically become hot in the 3rd, then cold until the final drive or two in the 4th.
NWU's offense was to our weakness on defense this game, most of the year the run defense was the weakness this game we had ZERO depth in the secondary. If a player went down we were looking at just finding someone to go to the spot like a receiver because we had no one there not even a backups backup.
Posted on 1/3/10 at 8:17 am to Tawanda
quote:
As far as LSU goes, I wanted them to win too, but they didn't. I could care less who had the better team. All anyone really cares about is who won.
yep. i would gladly have traded Penn State setting every record in the book for an LSU victory.....
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News