So if LSU has to hear 5 years into the Miles era..

quote:

---

So if LSU has to hear 5 years into the Miles era..
that Nick Saban

---

fwiw.. Nick had 2 SEC championships in 5 years. How badly does it reflect on Les if he can't match that, what with being left with a #1 and #2 recruiting class and carrying on to have top rated classes after that too.

Not the best way to compare. I think you'll agree with me that the SEC is a tad diff now then it was then. Saban won the SEC once in his first two years at LSU but may have none to show for in his first 3 years at Bama.

quote:

---

Saban has been in Tuscaloser for two years and still hasn't won shite and he probably won't win shite in his 3rd year in Tuscaloser either. What does that say about bammer?

---

It is more telling about the quality of the SEC than anything else.

quote:

---

Saban has been in Tuscaloosa for two years and got one of your best coaches ever fired

---

quote:

---

Saban has been in Tuscaloser for two years and still hasn't won shite and he probably won't win shite in his 3rd year in Tuscaloser either. What does that say about bammer?




It is more telling about the quality of the SEC than anything else.

---

Sounds like double standards are being used. One set for Saban the other for miles. Bama fans have become real hypocrites

quote:

---

Sounds like double standards are being used. One set for Saban the other for miles. Bama fans have become real hypocrites

---

+1

quote:

---

Sounds like double standards are being used

---

Bama and Ole Miss both have double standards. They want to trash Miles in a heartbeat but not use the same criteria to bash Saban or Nutt.

quote:

---

that Nick Saban is still the reason we are winning because he still have a few of his players here or there, how long does Ole Miss have to wait to get credit for Nutt being a good coach.

---

Not that you'll understand it, but...the reason there's a difference is because Leslie took over a winning program in a state that has a single university that gets recruits (as most of the other football programs in Louisiana are a joke)and has had similar results to Saban.

Nutt, on the other hand, took over a program that did not win a SEC game the year before and brought them to the Cotton Bowl. When you win with a team that lost for four straight years it is a bit more impressive than maintaining what was already in place with someone else's players (known as the "Coker Technique"). Time will tell if Nutt can win with his own players (which will say more about his recruiting than his coaching) as opposed to Leslie, who came in after the Saban Express and is at the only university talented kids in Louisiana would even think about going to to play football in state.

Once again a double standard

quote:

---

Not that you'll understand it, but...the reason there's a difference is because Leslie took over a winning program in a state that has a single university that gets recruits (as most of the other football programs in Louisiana are a joke)and has had similar results to Saban

---

Is there anything Ole Miss fans can't rationalize?

quote:

---

DeuceisLoose

---

Here's something you don't understand, and, to be honest, its a little surprising that you don't. If you've ever learned one thing from all of Ole Miss' suckage it should be that winning consistently is very difficult. Miles deserves more credit than you give him, but, no matter, his record speaks for itself. Nutt was very lucky that Orgeron, crappy head coach that he was, is such a good recruiter -- specifically Nutt was damn lucky to have Snead as his quarterback.

On the other hand, we are talking about Ole Miss. Perhaps leading Ole Miss to a bowl win is more impressive than leading any school to a national championship.