Started By
Message
re: Short of expulsion
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:06 am to Rebelinexile
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:06 am to Rebelinexile
The way you spaced your post made me read it like a poem 
1
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:07 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Kiffin has been pretty clear that they're not going to violate SEC rules. Not sure why people just keep assuming they have/will.
Because he told us about his team vote where the players were in favor of violating SEC rules.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:18 am to Kato
Typed on an iPhone
It creates issues sometimes
The meaning is clear
It creates issues sometimes
The meaning is clear
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:19 am to AGGIES
quote:
Because he told us about his team vote where the players were in favor of violating SEC rules.
The goal was to only bring in the players if they can do it within SEC rules, that remains the case.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:28 am to AGGIES
quote:
Because he told us about his team vote where the players were in favor of violating SEC rules.
Why do you all on this board continue to post things that aren't true? Yes, they had a team vote to add those players if it is deemed they are eligible to play. In no way whatsoever did he say the team voted to violate SEC rules.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:28 am to Rebelinexile
I think it will be more along the lines of just not playing them
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:33 am to Bryno1960
Yep. The entire conference is up in arms, all other 15 schools, and the SEC office… just don’t understand it correctly.
They think schools should follow the rules as were agreed to and voted on.
LSU tells the world that if a judge to tells them they don’t have to follow the rules, they want everyone to know they have a hall pass to ignore the rule.
They think schools should follow the rules as were agreed to and voted on.
LSU tells the world that if a judge to tells them they don’t have to follow the rules, they want everyone to know they have a hall pass to ignore the rule.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:34 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:34 am to AGGIES
quote:
Yep. The entire conference is up in arms, all other 15 schools, and the SEC office… just don’t understand it correctly.
They think schools should follow the rules as we agreed to and voted on.
LSU tells the world that if a judge to tells them they don’t have to follow the rules, they want everyone to know they have a hall pass to ignore the rule.
Meanwhile, LSU has continually said they'll follow conference rules.
It seems the only way they'd play the players is if the rules are determined to be illegal themselves.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:35 am to AGGIES
Lane Kiffin will use every loophole he can to get his way. SEC is tired of the legal posturing. But that is Lane Kiffin. He just does whatever he wants …
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:36 am to AGGIES
You are the one who stated, incorrectly, that Kiffin said the team voted to violate SEC Rules which they have not. Just pointing that out. I do understand that doesn't fit the collective narrative of this board though.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 11:38 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:39 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It seems the only way they'd play the players is if the rules are determined to be illegal themselves.
I just don’t think this will all be settled today in Baton Rouge.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:40 am to AGGIES
quote:
I just don’t think this will all be settled today in Baton Rouge.
Probably not, so LSU would at least have to be assured that they will receive no punishment.
The legal experts here say that isn't possible, so it appears they won't play for the time being.
Not sure why everyone is jumping to conclusions when all of the messaging has been consistent.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:41 am to Bryno1960
Set aside this board. It doesn’t exist.
Everyone else has just gone crazy?
Everyone else has just gone crazy?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:47 am to i am dan
quote:
Players from NFL rosters being recruited to return to college football?
Wrong - completely
Anything else?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:47 am to SidewalkTiger
How can LSU receive an assurance like that from the conference?
Lane will say, “they said it’s ok”.
Sankey will say, “who said that, because we didn’t”.
Lane will say, “they said it’s ok”.
Sankey will say, “who said that, because we didn’t”.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:49 am to lefty08
quote:
Unlucky for you and a lot of LSU fans, being a fan of a winning team doesn’t make you more intelligent
I thought we hadn't been in anyone's way for anything, and now we are fans of a winning team? Which one is it retard?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:49 am to AGGIES
quote:
They think schools should follow the rules as were agreed to and voted on.
Such as the NCAA saying a certain QB has run out of eligibility and a MS judge issues a recant?
Those rules?
What part of the SEC screwed this up because of ONE class, 2022.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:49 am to AGGIES
quote:
How can LSU receive an assurance like that from the conference?
It would have to be from the conference, or some type of legal protection.
quote:
Lane will say, “they said it’s ok”.
Sankey will say, “who said that, because we didn’t”.
No way they take that kind of risk. Do people actually believe LSU is going to risk the penalties listed for a couple of reserve players?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:51 am to Rebelinexile
quote:
Rebelinexile
You should remain in exile.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:53 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It would have to be from the conference, or some type of legal protection.
I would not think that legal protection from Baton Rouge today is enough long term assurance.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News