Started By
Message
re: SECCG ratings drop 49% from last year.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:07 am to rbWarEagle
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:07 am to rbWarEagle
I watched it twice. 
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:08 am to rbWarEagle
weak shite you got there bro.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:08 am to UASports23
I watched last year, and went to the La Tech/Nevada game this year.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:08 am to Tennessee Jed
quote:
Did not watch a single play. Can't think of the last SEC Championship game I didn't watch at least half of.
Probably for the best. After watching UT all year we would've hated for you to see what competitive football looked like.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:09 am to UASports23
I didn't watch the game.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:10 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
We got our arse beat and we assume based on little actual evidence that Cam Newton was paid by Auburn, even though there is no evidence linking Auburn or Cam Newton.
What is sad is you actually think NCAA investigations move that quickly and new evidence can't be found. No one outside of the state of Alabama believes a word that comes out of Cam Netwon's mouth and if I had to guess neither does the NCAA. Yes they had to take his word on the eligibility ruling, but I would venture a guess they will do a little more digging before this is over.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:10 am to TigerWoody
Nah, the only weak thing happening are the constant Cam Newton/Auburn cheating threads, none of which bring any new argument or any new evidence to support ANY of the bullshite claims.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:11 am to Aman
quote:
What is sad is you actually think NCAA investigations move that quickly and new evidence can't be found.
I do? Quick, what am I thinking right now?!!
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:11 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
constant Cam Newton/Auburn cheating threads
One trick ponies don't stop doing their trick.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:13 am to TigerWoody
I don't operate on conjecture or innuendo. Innocent until proven guilty. They prove us guilty, I'll be the first one to come here and say we fricked up.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:14 am to rbWarEagle
why should AU or USC fans give a frick who watches the game?

Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:14 am to rbWarEagle
It's OK. Cam didn't know. 
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:15 am to UASports23
I didn't watch and will not watch the national championship game.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:15 am to TigerWoody
Conjecture. Clearly it doesn't bother you to operate on it. To each their own 
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:16 am to jatebe
quote:
I didn't watch and will not watch the national championship game.
ahhh puhleezeeee
next year we will spot bama 30
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:16 am to piggidyphish
Yea, I agree. It isn't a shocker or far fetched. We all know it was going to happen when all of the MAJOR schools had teh suck this year and Boise/TCU/Utah were in top 10 for half, if not all of the season.
I predict the BCSCG will be the less watched Championship game in years. Unless, something with Camgate arrises, no one watches, Oregon v Auburn doesn't cut it like Ohio State v LSU, Oklahoma v Florida, Alabama v Texas, USC v Texas, Ohio State v Miami.
I predict the BCSCG will be the less watched Championship game in years. Unless, something with Camgate arrises, no one watches, Oregon v Auburn doesn't cut it like Ohio State v LSU, Oklahoma v Florida, Alabama v Texas, USC v Texas, Ohio State v Miami.
This post was edited on 12/6/10 at 10:19 am
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:17 am to jatebe
quote:
I didn't watch and will not watch the national championship game.
I can't tell you how unbelievably sad this makes me. Boycotting is so noble. Fight the good fight, my man.
Popular
Back to top



0






