Started By
Message
re: SEC TOP 5 wideouts
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:28 am to boXerrumble
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:28 am to boXerrumble
Why not? What would prevent our receivers from doing well in your offense?
1
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:29 am to ReauxlTide222
Post some PFF rankings reauxl
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:29 am to ReauxlTide222
Clearly this guy didn’t watched our offense last year lmao
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:30 am to ReauxlTide222
Nah, what you are responding to isn’t what I meant.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:32 am to Terrific Tales
quote:
Why not? What would prevent our receivers from doing well in your offense?
Mullen's offenses spread the ball out evenly. There would not be a difference in production.
Franks not growing has hindered the overall WR production.
With Trask throwing now, hopefully the WRs get a better opportunity to show what they are capable of.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:33 am to boXerrumble
quote:
50/50 with a lean to run
What I’m the world does this have to do with the idea that our receivers would have better stats at UF than your current receivers? It’s one team in both scenarios, with the same play calling. 1 just has more productive receivers.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:33 am to boXerrumble
What do you mean by “evenly”?
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:35 am to boXerrumble
Dude, what does evenly have to do with the (IMO) fact that our receivers would get open more often than yours and have more yards after catch in your offense, and therefore have better stats? You aren’t making any sense.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:37 am to Terrific Tales
quote:
What I’m the world does this have to do with the idea that our receivers would have better stats at UF than your current receivers? It’s one team in both scenarios, with the same play calling. 1 just has more productive receivers.
They would not have better stats. Mullen's offense spreads the targets out, and runs more than throws it, meaning the WRs would have less targets and opportunities overall at UF than they would at LSU, equaling less production.
If you cant see that, then you are clueless.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:38 am to boXerrumble
I didn’t say than AT LSU. I said they would have more production AT UF than your current WRs do AT UF.
Jesus
Jesus
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:38 am to Terrific Tales
[quote that our receivers would get open more often than yours and have more yards after catch in your offense
[/quote]
If you've watched UF at all this year (which you obviously haven't), UF has had open WRs running free in every game.
If Trask continues to grow, they will be able to show what they can do better than how they were with Franks.
[/quote]
If you've watched UF at all this year (which you obviously haven't), UF has had open WRs running free in every game.
If Trask continues to grow, they will be able to show what they can do better than how they were with Franks.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:39 am to Terrific Tales
quote:
I didn’t say than AT LSU. I said they would have more production AT UF than your current WRs do AT UF.
Jesus
When did I imply LSU? Can you fricking read? I just clearly described why they wouldn't have BETTER production at UF than UF's current WRs.
You can't read worth a shite.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:39 am to boXerrumble
I just think you don’t understand what I am trying to say, so whatever. You are probably too stubborn to admit you misunderstood anyway.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:40 am to boXerrumble
Dude LSUs WRs are better than yalls
You can keep creating these magical special situations where yalls are better but it just doesn’t work. Mullen would whore out his wife to anyone on the planet to switch WR corps.
Recruit better
You can keep creating these magical special situations where yalls are better but it just doesn’t work. Mullen would whore out his wife to anyone on the planet to switch WR corps.
Recruit better
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 12:42 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:40 am to Sun God
quote:I thought we lost respect for PFF when they had Fromm ahead of everyone and they left Burrow off the list completely.
Post some PFF rankings reauxl
I don’t like PFF and never have. I’ve always complained about them here. For years.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:41 am to Cd104444
quote:I’m pretty sure you completely missed my point.
Clearly this guy didn’t watched our offense last year lmao
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:41 am to Terrific Tales
You are making the argument that because LSU's WRs clearly are "better" given their current production at LSU, they would clearly be better than UF's WR's in UF's current offense.
Which is simply not fricking true.
Which is simply not fricking true.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:42 am to Cd104444
quote:I’m pretty sure you completely missed my point
Clearly this guy didn’t watched our offense last year lmao
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:42 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I don’t like PFF and never have. I’ve always complained about them here. For years
ETA: unless it was about deionte v. delpit
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 12:44 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:42 am to boXerrumble
quote:
meaning the WRs would have less targets and opportunities overall at UF than they would at LSU.
That is where you said at LSU.
Yes they would obviously have less production at UF than they do at LSU. They would have better production than UF’s current WRs though. Nothing you have said has remotely backed up the contrary.
Page 10 of 14
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News