Started By
Message

re: SEC Teams Ranked by Winning % the Last 40, 50, and 60 Years

Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:56 am to
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18451 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Why did yall have to abandon the 84 title? Was that due to cheating?


quote:

NCAA violations that were found in the case included cash inducements to prospects, cash and other benefits to enrolled student-athletes, complimentary ticket sales for enrolled studentathletes, outside funds that were maintained and administered contrary to NCAA rules by the former head football coach and a former administrative assistant, the arrangement of cost-free room and board for "unaided" student-athletes, the secret scouting of football opponents, the conduct of out-of-season football practices and the use of an excessive number of coaches to recruit.


Type in University of Florida under institution and search
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34658 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 10:36 am to
Winning percentage is overrated. I have Notre Dame, Alabama and USC ranked as the three greatest CFB programs of all-time and none of schools crack the top 5 in any of those lists.
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
10033 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

You....weren't....in....the....S...E....C.....you..... frickin'..... moron


No shite genious.

If you don't like the lists, dont read
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
10033 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

No....but i know LSU history. And history consists of more than just win %....like championships, division titles, conference titles.


You have had a great 10 year run, there is no denying that. Congrats.

The 50 years prior to the last 10 years leaves a bad taste in your shite talking mouth I imagine though. Just outside of the top 20 and 8th out of the current members of the SEC.
Even Ole Miss was better than youx.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42854 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

No....but i know LSU history. And history consists of more than just win %....like championships, division titles, conference titles.



Wow, rivals of Ole Miss, I see.

However, Arkansas was the second team besides Alabama to make it to Atlanta.

Arkansas has more conference titles than LSU, based on your criteria, the number for Arkansas is 16 while LSU has only 14 championship years counting two from the oh so hard SIAA conference.

Face it the SEC was a one team league of Alabama followed by everyone else and was no harder than the SWC during that time.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

No shite genious.

If you don't like the lists, dont read


your list doesn't make any sense
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

However, Arkansas was the second team besides Alabama to make it to Atlanta.


well there's something to hang your hat on.......i guess

quote:

Arkansas has more conference titles than LSU, based on your criteria, the number for Arkansas is 16 while LSU has only 14 championship years counting two from the oh so hard SIAA conference.


go take this to orangebloods.com or TexAgs.com where it belongs. I don't care about your meaningless SWC conference "championships"

quote:

Face it the SEC was a one team league of Alabama followed by everyone else and was no harder than the SWC during that time.


This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 1:43 pm
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42854 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:49 pm to
If LSU is such a power house, why did it take them 6 years longer to win the west and make it to Atlanta compared to Arkansas?

Face it LSU narrowly edges out Arkansas in this list due to playing in a weaker conference.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

If LSU is such a power house, why did it take them 6 years longer to win the west and make it to Atlanta compared to Arkansas?


two words....Curly Hallman

quote:

Face it LSU narrowly edges out Arkansas in this list due to playing in a weaker conference.


So you're saying LSU beats out Arky because we played in the weaker SEC? Please tell me this is what you're saying....

btw....LSU turned down your shitty conference
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:08 pm
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Face it the SEC was a one team league of Alabama followed by everyone else and was no harder than the SWC during that time.


I kind of agree with this actually.

The SEC "Big 6" is largely a crock of shite, IMO, and just an excuse for one really good program then a bunch of mediocres who can occassionally jump up and slap the big guy (but usually spend their time beating the hell out of one another), and then the gutter trash.

Said mediocres have had a pretty good run as of late because the big guy and CFB in general have been in the toilet the past few years.

Alabama is the closest thing to college football royalty the SEC has, and then it's just a bunch of teams who've had a good run here or there. With another 20 year run like they've had since 1990, Florida would cement themselves as the legitimate "other program" in the SEC. But Georgia, Tennessee, LSU, and Auburn all have histories of falling off the map and/or sh*tting the bed at precisely the right time to really keep them from ever becoming the true "other team" in the SEC.
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:25 pm
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41245 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by chilld28
Get in B Chord and Mash It!!
Member since Nov 2009
29622 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

smelvis
Great post. Would read again
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:30 pm to
Anyone who actually disagrees with this is going to wind up talking in circles, pulling ancient history, meaningless conjecture, and opinion out of their arse; and trying to scream louder than anyone else to try to prove the point wrong.

Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

quote:


Face it the SEC was a one team league of Alabama followed by everyone else and was no harder than the SWC during that time.




I kind of agree with this actually.

The SEC "Big 6" is largely a crock of shite, IMO, and just an excuse for one really good program then a bunch of mediocres who can occassionally jump up and slap the big guy (but usually spend their time beating the hell out of one another), and then the gutter trash.

Said mediocres have had a pretty good run as of late because the big guy and CFB in general have been in the toilet the past few years


there are 4 SEC teams with double digit conference titles....7 with more than 5.

bama ruled the SEC in the 70's but it was pretty even before and afterwards.

So now tell me.....which conference was a one horse show?
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:37 pm
Posted by KajunGator
Lake Arthur, LA
Member since May 2011
7532 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

quote:


smelvis


Great post. Would read again


Agreed
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:33 pm to
I'm not saying the SWC > or = to the SEC.

But I am saying the SEC is a lot more "one horse" than most people are willing to admit.

And FYI, 3 of those 4 teams with double digit conference titles had them 30 years ago.

Only one has since joined, and those 30 years have been, arguably, the greatest parity the league has ever seen.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41245 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

the SWC had 2 teams with double digit titles....and UT has 64 of them. Only 1 other team has more than 5. There are 4 other teams with either 1 or 2 titles.


WTF are you talking about? Do you just make stuff up and try to pass it as fact?

Texas - 27
A&M - 17
Arkansas - 13
SMU - 11
TCU - 9
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:36 pm
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying the SWC > or = to the SEC.


i know you're not....but a certain pig fan is.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

WTF are you talking about? Do you just make stuff up and try to pass it as fact?

Texas - 27
A&M - 17
Arkansas - 13
SMU - 11
TCU - 9


disregard that part. error on me. edited
This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:40 pm
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42854 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

the SWC had 2 teams with double digit titles....and UT has 64 of them. Only 1 other team has more than 5. There are 4 other teams with either 1 or 2 titles.



Wrong.

Texas has 26 SWC championships. (2 after we left)
Arkansas has 13 SWC Championships.
Texas A&M has 16 SWC championships (3 after we left)
TCU has 10 SWC Championships (1 after we left)
SMU has 11 SWC championsihps.
Rice had 7.
Baylor had 5.
Houston had 4 in their brief time in the league
Texas Tech had 2.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter