re: SEC realignment survey

#2

My 12 team format:

PAC-12: Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, Cal, Stanford, USC, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, BYU

Big XII: Colorado, Iowa State, Mizzou, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Texas, Texas A&M, Baylor and TCU

SEC: Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Miss State, Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, USCe, Tennessee, Kentucky and Vandy

Big Ten: Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Illinois, Indiana, Purdue, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State and Penn State

ACC: Miami, FSU, Clemson, Georgia Tech, UNC, Duke, NC State, Wake Forest, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Maryland and BC

Big East: Rutgers, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, Temple, SMU, Houston, Army and Navy

Independent: Notre Dame, UConn

Playoff: Six conference champs and two at-large bids: Use the NY6 bowls

Too many teams in each conference and too many conferences are lopsided in this scenario. Just wait ll the gnashing of teeth starts when an acc champ that didn’t play fsu Miami or Clem; Or a big 12 team that dodged ou tex and atm gets in. Love the service academies they’re still real college football but they need to be in D2 or Ivy League in today’s game. Same could be said for wake forest Rutgers and northwestern. Probably vandy too. Can cincy wash St Oregon st afford a thirty mil roster every year? Do some of these schools want to spend that kinda money or they just happy getting a paycheck?

quote:

---

Clemson would provide more revenue and prestige to the conference.

---