Started By
Message
re: SEC officials: penalty should have been called on Dial
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
I am on topic.he is bitching about a non call and I am pointing out other non calls...I guess the OP just wants to point out one play like it was the only one that should be reviewed. They were watching play and did not flag it..that should be enough right?
0
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Dial lowers his shoulder and uses his forearm and shoulder to hit Murray in the chest
His forearm is the last to make contact, and without a frame by frame, it's tough to make a case whether his helmet or shoulder hit first
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to sarc
quote:
2. Contact above the shoulders on a player who is obviously out of the play
He was to everyone but you Gumps.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:
Literally, any non-biased person in the world, can look at the .gif and see Dial lower his shoulder and hit Murray's chest and then the momentum carried him into his facemask.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to ugastudent
"watched Alabama's Ha-Sean Clinton-Dix return the ball upfield"
Funny
Funny
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to JStanDawgFan
quote:A flag for "unnecessary roughness" I would have been okay with. That's an extreme grey area and you could say he crossed the line (even though no one can clearly say where the line is)
I agree with your argument and I hate that aggressive play is being taken away from modern football. However SEC officials has said that a flag should have been thrown, so I am not sure you can just dismiss it as a "clean" hit.
But you can't suspend a kid when he didn't actually do anything illegal, he was just too rough. That's absurd.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to genro
No, you really don't. As much as you want to go all head in the sand here, the video shows helmet to helmet at a minimum. It was an unnecessary hit.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:49 pm to genro
quote:
we have video proof that they are wrong now.
Had that on the "tipped" pass.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:50 pm to genro
He led with his shoulder, but contact with his head and Murray's head was made in the process. That is a penalty.
IDC either way since Murray was fine the rest of the game. Had it injured him, then there would be justifiable cause for a call of foul play.
IDC either way since Murray was fine the rest of the game. Had it injured him, then there would be justifiable cause for a call of foul play.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:50 pm to mattloc
quote:
If the league suspends him they should also suspend the Georgia player who first laid an equally vicious h2h hit on McCarron.
Anyone got a video or gif of hit by the Georgia player? Not trying to argue about it, just haven't seen it.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:51 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
No, you really don't. As much as you want to go all head in the sand here, the video shows helmet to helmet at a minimum. It was an unnecessary hit.
The Gumps are ignoring this pic.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:51 pm to Rebelgator
Dial was out to do one thing....take Murrays head off.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:51 pm to LSUdm21
Explain to me how a fricking still picture (from only the neck up) is going to establish whether his forearm or helmet hit first?
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:52 pm to Alahunter
lol...he didnt fricking see it coming, my god he got de-cleated. and the tackle literally was in progress as he hit him. Its not that he hit him, its how. It was a blatant foul and attempt to take him out.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:52 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
The Gumps are ignoring this pic.
yep...crown of the helmet into the facemask
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:52 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
The Gumps are ignoring this pic.
No, yall just dont know the rule.
Here it is.
Again.
1. Leading with the crown of the helmet
or
2. Contact above the shoulders on a player who is obviously out of the play
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:53 pm to Sandwich
quote:
lol...he didnt fricking see it coming,
ORLY?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:53 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:
this would be an interesting case study on 'peoples ability to see what's really happening, as opposed to seeing what they want to believe.'
Happens in sports all time.
Literally, any non-biased person in the world, can look at the .gif and see Dial lead with the crown of his helmet and hit Murray's Neck/Jaw.
True. This thread is case & point.. every non-gump thinks its penalty-deserving, every gump thinks it isn't. It's easy to see what's going on here.
Get over it, lads, the SEC officials know alot more about this than you do, considering y'know, it's their job..
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:53 pm to TreyAnastasio
What's worse a helmet to the head, or a lineman landing on your groin area?
Murray got both!
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:54 pm to genro
quote:
A flag for "unnecessary roughness" I would have been okay with. That's an extreme grey area and you could say he crossed the line (even though no one can clearly say where the line is)
But you can't suspend a kid when he didn't actually do anything illegal, he was just too rough. That's absurd.
I cannot disagree with that at all. I guess it all comes down to what Slive decides to do with this one.
Page 6 of 25
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News