Started By
Message
re: SEC football standings since expansion, and in this decade
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:11 pm to woopiginaustin
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:11 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:You have a serious man crush Mcfadden and Jones...
woopiginaustin
...reality check they are gone
1
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:14 pm to LSUfanatic60
quote:
You have a serious man crush Mcfadden and Jones... ...reality check they are gone
But their .500 SEC record and 0-2 Bowl record lives forever!!!!!
This post was edited on 5/24/09 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:17 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:good thing they have those stats to fall back on
But their .500 SEC record and 0-2 Bowl record lives forever!!!!!
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:24 pm to LSUfanatic60
quote:
tell me who our Heismen candiate was. LSU's biggest star was Dorsey.
For one what do you mean by championship years? Do you mean the decade or just 2001,2003,2007?
The Heisman is overrated since it can only be won by basically a QB or RB.
2007 Stars:
Dorsey
Steltz
Highsmith
C. Jackson
C. Jones
Holliday(mainly high profile because of speed)
*The others were getting some type of All-American talk(1st,2nd,or freshman team)
2003:
Lavalais
Wilkerson
Vincent
Green
Clayton
Landry
Peterman
2001:
The Great Josh Reed
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:30 pm to lsutiger2486
quote:we agree on this. and the players you mentioned were great players not stars. which proves my point LSU fielded great teams.
The Heisman is overrated since it can only be won by basically a QB or RB
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:36 pm to LSUfanatic60
quote:
the players you mentioned were great players not stars.
What is considered a star? I tried to only list the players that got national recognition those years in some form such as award lists and All-American teams. I think it is wrong to just say LSU won the championships without stars.
There were more players that were on all conference teams.
To win a championship you have to field great teams obviously. Almost all great teams have stars. Are you trying to say someone like Craig Steltz is not a star even though he was an All-American.
Most people considered Andre Smith a star. He was an All-American.
This post was edited on 5/24/09 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 5/24/09 at 5:48 pm to lsutiger2486
quote:Im talking about the Mcfadden, Bush, Cadillac types that has the media wetting there pants over. the ones that get tickets to NY at the end of the season. like the saying goes "you dont come to LSU to win Heisman's you come to win championships" i love that saying
What is considered a star?
Posted on 5/24/09 at 6:05 pm to LSUfanatic60
quote:
Cadillac
Did Cadillac get invited to NY for the Heisman? I am just saying we have had a shite ton of stars. We have a ton of running backs that primarily suffer from sharing the load.
The one thing we can say is that we have won three championships with NFL QBs just not the high draft pick ones. I think you are selling some of our talent short or you have a very high weird standard for a star.
Posted on 5/24/09 at 6:08 pm to xiv
quote:
We've finished 17 seasons now, and here's how it looks:
quote:
Tennessee 101-37-0 (2) .732
quote:
5. Tennessee 47-25 .653
So Phat Phil starts 54-12 (or better since 3 of the 1992 losses were Johnny Majors) in the first 8 years and finishes the last nine years at 47-25. I can't believe the AD let it slide that far. Everyone could see it after 2002.
Posted on 5/24/09 at 6:14 pm to AreJay
quote:
tennessee: 50 drafted (8 1st rd, 10 2nd rd)
This drives me nuts. The most picks in either of the first two rounds and the most picks overall and all Phat Phil could come up with is a few losses to LSU in the SECCG.
Posted on 5/24/09 at 6:22 pm to lsutiger2486
(no message)
Posted on 5/24/09 at 6:23 pm to lsutiger2486
quote:i think its safe to say we agree on everything except defanition of a star so ill just leave it at that
lsutiger2486
Posted on 5/26/09 at 8:25 am to xiv
quote:Before last year, LSU was the team of the decade.
1. Florida 56-19 (3) .747
2. Georgia 53-21 (2) .716
3. Louisiana State 53-22 (3) .707
Posted on 5/26/09 at 9:13 am to lsutiger2486
quote:
You give ANY OTHER TEAM those individuals and that team goes over .500
I think a team having Hillis, Jones, McFadden, and Monk on offense should have brought home some serious team hardware.
You have to have 22 solid starters pus 22 good backups. Arky has never had the depth to be a SEC contender. A few stars don't make a great team.
You must be a piccalo player.
Posted on 5/26/09 at 9:17 am to Bert Lyons 716
Kige, where you at? Kentucky sucks
Posted on 5/26/09 at 11:35 am to AuburnCPA
quote:17 SEC victories in a fricking DECADE? And it's a state school!
Kentucky sucks
Posted on 5/26/09 at 11:47 am to xiv
quote:
Since expansion
2000-2008
You didn't want to do one from 92-99?
Posted on 5/26/09 at 12:03 pm to Cdawg
quote:1. Florida 60-8 (4) .882
You didn't want to do one from 92-99?
2. Tennessee 54-12 (2) .818
3. Alabama 42-24 (2) .636
4. Auburn 34-28-2 .547
5. Georgia 34-29-1 .539
6. Mississippi State 32-31-1 .508
7. Arkansas 29-33-2 .469
8. Mississippi 27-37 .422
9. Louisiana State 26-37-1 .414
10. Kentucky 21-43 .328
11. South Carolina 19-44-1 .305
12. Vanderbilt 10-54 .156
Interdivision
East 77
West 71
Tie 2
I'll add to the OP as well.
Posted on 5/26/09 at 12:16 pm to xiv
3. Alabama 42-24 (2) .636
I'm guessing that includes the 8 games we had to forfeit in '93 per NCAA in the loss column.
I'm guessing that includes the 8 games we had to forfeit in '93 per NCAA in the loss column.
Posted on 5/26/09 at 12:30 pm to Alahunter
quote:Six "wins" and a "tie" (to Tennessee) are indeed included in the loss column.
I'm guessing that includes the 8 games we had to forfeit in '93 per NCAA in the loss column.
Step One of winning a football game: field a team of eligible players. Sorry, Gumps.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News