re: SEC Bowl Game Predictions

quote:

---

They may not be "sky high" but they will be better prepared than state. Fitzgerald is just a better coach than Mullen to be quite honest.

---

If this is the case, then why can't Fitzgerald win a bowl game?

Bash Dan all you want, Dan is 2-0 I'm bowl games and the last time he was given a month to prepare for a big 10 team we beat Michigan 52-14 and shut down Denard Robinson.

Ummmm, "you're" mad too?


Catch y'all later, I'm off to church with the wife's family. Peace

quote:

---

LSU>USCe>Clemson

---

While I am the first to admit I think we lose to LSU please come up with a better reason than this. Transitive property DOES NOT WORK in college football. We beat Auburn by 7 and LSU beat Auburn by 2 so using your logic we should get a 5 point win over LSU. Why do people continue to try and use this type of argument when talking about match ups?

quote:

---

That isn't transitive property.

---

My example is not but his example IS.

He basically said if LSU > USC and USC > CU then LSU > CU which would in fact be part of transitive law ( Likewise is the property inequality if the two inequalities have the same sense: that is, if A is greater than B (i.e., A > B) and B > C, then A > C; and if A is less than B (i.e., A < B) and B < C, then A < C.)

We all have seen this idea trashed at some point or another on a college football field. I am not saying it will fail to be true when LSU and CU face off but its possible.

quote:

---

Only loss will be moo st

---