Started By
Message
re: Reports out that Clem players’ “B” sample also positive for PEDs.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to CivilTiger83
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to CivilTiger83
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.
Guilty.
Guilty.
1
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:57 pm to Jake_LaMotta
Yeah but you guys have an entire team on PEDs.
Apples and oranges.
ETA: To be fair, so does Clemson.
Apples and oranges.
ETA: To be fair, so does Clemson.
This post was edited on 12/27/18 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:57 pm to JustGetItRight
Will the clemson guys be benched for the rest of the playoffs (if they beat ND) or just one game? Seems like if it's PED's you'd have to bench them till next season. Whatever positives they got from them could last for quite a while (although I admit I have no idea what they took).
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:59 pm to Toneski
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:59 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
They're gone for a full year.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:03 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
And the amount detected was a tiny trace. You think they are programmatically doping but have been through three of them previously without a single hit?
How often were they tested through the year?
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:04 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
An Ironman triathlete recently was suspended and successfully appealed when it was found that salt tablets she took contained trace amounts of the chemical.
That's just because she was a woman. All Lance Armstrong ever did was suck on a few salt tablets here and there, you know, just to make his heart the size of a whale's heart. Just for that, they took away all his Tour De France championships.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:08 pm to A Lite
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:13 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
And the amount detected was a tiny trace
The word Dabo used was "slither." Not "sliver"..."slither."
And since snakes DO slither, I will allow it.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:14 pm to A Lite
Lance is just a dumb example... There were multiple witnesses who testified to his doping and how he beat the test. Two of the three have never failed a drug/PED test and have been in the program for three or more years.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:17 pm to A Lite
Yeah, dude just put a little extra salt on his tater-tots and boom, NCAA up his fricken arse.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:18 pm to Toneski
This shite needs to end. Now these guys are sitting out playoff games?
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to CivilTiger83
How is it a dumb example?
It's the quintessential example of how its possible to beat drug testing in sport. Not just once or twice, but for years. Lance Armstrong was THE most dope tested athlete in history, and he never failed a drug test.
I don't know what happened in Clemson or why, nor do I care. They had a banned substance in their system. Both tests confirmed it.
Guilty.
It's the quintessential example of how its possible to beat drug testing in sport. Not just once or twice, but for years. Lance Armstrong was THE most dope tested athlete in history, and he never failed a drug test.
I don't know what happened in Clemson or why, nor do I care. They had a banned substance in their system. Both tests confirmed it.
Guilty.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.
Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.
I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:23 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
I don't know what happened in Clemson or why, nor do I care. They had a banned substance in their system. Both tests confirmed it.
Well genius, in the case of the triathlete, her being able to prove the exposure was accidental and using an approved substance lifted her ban. It's that simple.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:23 pm to ForeverGator
Y'all are so stupid. Everyone knows Saban never overlooks the on deck opppnent in preparation for the team in the hole. Bama is playing Oklahoma Saturday, not Clemson. Duh.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:24 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
Two of the three have never failed a drug/PED test and have been in the program for three or more years.
That's iron clad proof right there that they definitely couldn't have done something wrong this time. Yall need to appeal this shite. Has Dabo not told NCAA that most these players passed their drug test last year ?
This shite is crazy.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:26 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.
You need to brush up on your human physiology. With a half life of less than a day (hours) any trace of it will be totally out of the in less than 48 hours.
To me if the case you're is reality it's a worse scenario for Clemson. Wait til the NCAA says Clemson has to start vacating wins....
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:35 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
You need to brush up on your human physiology. With a half life of less than a day (hours) any trace of it will be totally out of the in less than 48 hours.
This is Juicing 101.
Hopefully the board learned something today.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:37 pm to Lonnie Utah
Clemson had to resort to doping to beat us.
Prove us wrong, Clemson. Ohhhh that's right...you can't. And proof is on our side, not yours.
Prove us wrong, Clemson. Ohhhh that's right...you can't. And proof is on our side, not yours.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News