Started By
Message
re: Reality is Bama fans thought the program was bigger than Saban
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Outside of Bear and Saban, Alabama ain’t shite
I heard if you take away all of their first-round draft picks, conference titles, championships, and remove half the seats in the stadium, they're seriously arse.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:50 pm to TT9
quote:
Bryant went to A&M after Kentucky dumbass.
You came to the Rant expecting reason or logic from people who don't know football and cant see past their hate?
Wrong place. Wrong time. Wrong people.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:53 pm to footballtiger
Now we have someone trash talking Alabama by comparing them to Manchester United?
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:02 pm to Run DMC
quote:
the 2 greatest coaches in college football history.
And Stallings was no slouch.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:11 pm to TrueTiger
Bama is the only program that has won a natty in every era except the 80’s.
So BAMA is bigger than any one coach. A good coach can win a natty at bama.
Last i checked Saban isn't the only coach with a statue on the walk of Champions.
So BAMA is bigger than any one coach. A good coach can win a natty at bama.
Last i checked Saban isn't the only coach with a statue on the walk of Champions.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:12 pm to captdalton
quote:
Now we have someone trash talking Alabama by comparing them to Manchester United?
True story — I once had a European guy tell me that Manchester United was like Alabama, so I should root for City instead.

Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:13 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I mean...Saban got 6 while at Alabama and Bryant got 6 while at Alabama. So of the 18 claimed, 12 were won by those two. Take those away, and they are very close to everybody else.
There is a big problem with this. When people say “but for Bear and Saban” they seem to assume that another coach would not have won a single game. It is a what if game no one knows the answer to. We have no idea how good or bad Alabama would have been during that period. What if Bear Bryant hadn’t listened to mama and come to Alabama. But what if instead Bobby Bowden had listened and come home to Alabama in 1979 instead of going to Florida State? There are all kinds of scenarios we can make up. But in none of them would Alabama have gone winless for 42 seasons.
I know one thing, if you subtract the wins and accomplishments of any program’s top two coaches they look a lot different.
Georgia? Now do Georgia without the Dooley and Smart years.
Ohio State? Now do them without Woody Hayes and Jim Tressel.
LSU? How do they look without Saban and Miles?
Florida? Now do Florida without Spurrier and Meyer.
You can’t subtract 42 years of Alabama football and then compare them to other programs complete history. It is stupid.
It is like taking two wheels off a winning race car after the race and saying “but look, now it is the slowest car”.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:22 pm to captdalton
quote:
There is a big problem with this. When people say “but for Bear and Saban” they seem to assume that another coach would not have won a single game.
This is true and and a good point.
quote:
It is a what if game no one knows the answer to.
Also, true. But, when you consider the coaches that were available at the time Saban and Bryant were available, it's not too much of a stretch to think a title might not have been won. Another point could be that if Bryant had not coached at Alabama a lot of the history Alabama has would have been lost and they might have won even fewer than what they did.
quote:I get that, and it too is legitimate to say. but the original question was Alabama has a normal history if they did not have Saban and Bryant and an Alabama fan scoffed at the notion. It wasn't an argument that other programs would have been better or what if they lost their two best coaches. It was an Alabama centered statement, which was a fair statement.
I know one thing, if you subtract the wins and accomplishments of any program’s top two coaches they look a lot different.
quote:
You can’t subtract 42 years of Alabama football and then compare them to other programs complete history. It is stupid.
Just like you can't argue that Alabama would have been the same without Bryant and Saban. It works both ways.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:24 pm to BAMAneck
quote:
Bama is the only program that has won a natty in every era except the 80’s.
So BAMA is bigger than any one coach. A good coach can win a natty at bama.
And how many of those titles were won by Bryant or Saban? It just seems silly to say Saban and Bryant are not special. Like I said. take them away from Alabama, and Alabama is pretty much the same as several other SEC teams.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:41 pm to Run DMC
I have to say, it’s been extremely rewarding to watch Bama fans come crashing back down to reality.
I didn’t expect it to come this fast, and I also thought the Vanderbilt loss last season would’ve been the last embarrassing moment they had for a while. Boy was I wrong.
I am extremely excited to see what DeBoer continues to bring to the program!
I didn’t expect it to come this fast, and I also thought the Vanderbilt loss last season would’ve been the last embarrassing moment they had for a while. Boy was I wrong.
I am extremely excited to see what DeBoer continues to bring to the program!
Posted on 9/2/25 at 4:59 pm to Run DMC
Very true! Bama fans used to be associated with college football greatness. Now they are only known as the hillbillies whose college football team sucks. How did this happen so quickly?
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:11 pm to lsupride87
So, Bama aspires to be a program that they are 57-27-5 against? Interesting
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:13 pm to Volatile
Bama got Bryant because he played for Bama and stated when Bama offered him the job "Mama called". He would have come to Bama regardless.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:17 pm to paperwasp
You lucked into Saban. You won't admit it but true fans know. Saban would have done the same at LSU or Georgia, heck even Tennessee and you know it. Saban's success wasn't exclusively tied to Bama. His success is because he was an absolute college coaching savant.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:21 pm to Run DMC
As T-Bob said:
“Bama fans are like trust fund kids that have gone bankrupt.”
“Bama fans are like trust fund kids that have gone bankrupt.”
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:24 pm to kajunman
quote:
You lucked into Saban
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:32 pm to paperwasp
quote:
I heard if you take away all of their first-round draft picks, conference titles, championships, and remove half the seats in the stadium, they're seriously arse.

Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:37 pm to Tua_2_Smitty
quote:
Bama got Bryant because he played for Bama and stated when Bama offered him the job "Mama called". He would have come to Bama regardless.
Saban said his biggest regret was leaving LSU
Womp! Womp!
Posted on 9/2/25 at 5:38 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I get that, and it too is legitimate to say. but the original question was Alabama has a normal history if they did not have Saban and Bryant and an Alabama fan scoffed at the notion
We just went through this. You can not really do that honestly. You say that it is likely Alabama wouldn’t have won one single title during those 42 years. In my scenario instead of Bear they hire Ara Parseghian, followed by Bobby Bowden. Those two won a combined 13 national titles over 42 years. No, let’s make it 14. They won 14.
That is just as accurate as saying Alabama would have won zero.
I will counter your argument with one about Georgia. Without Dooley and Smart Georgia is scummy pond water with one measly national championship during world war II, so it doesn’t even count. Take away Georgia’s two best coaches and those dawgs are past due to be euthanized.
See how it works?
Popular
Back to top



1







