Started By
Message

re: Ranking the size of SEC fanbases, IMHO

Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:11 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120023 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:11 pm to
Maybe you didn't understand any of my posts.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
26819 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:14 pm to
Yes you said it was nearly impossible for Fanbase A to be substantially bigger than Fanbase B in a state our size.

I told you why it could.

SC, like AL = no pro teams
SC, like AL = football ctazy
SC, like AL = similar population
SC, like AL = has a higher proportion of its population dedicated to both schools.
SC, like AL = can support two top 25 schools because of this.
SC, like AL = has 1 school that has a significant amount of more support than the other. Although the other has a respectable amount of support as well.

eta: All SC fans know Clemson has a substantial fan base, but what you are not getting is that yes it is in fact possible and a simple fact that SC's is notably bigger.

This post was edited on 4/2/13 at 11:17 pm
Posted by TlGERBLOOD
South Orange, NJ
Member since Nov 2011
514 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Maybe you didn't understand any of my posts.


I think these cocks are just butthurt that each list consistently ranked their fanbase behind ours. And they're using the fact that we called b.s. on their broad statement to expel some of this angst.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120023 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:20 pm to
I think they don't read good.

Eta: I think whenever someone types "Clemson" it's like waving a red flag in front of a bull. It triggers some animal instinct to attack. Reason and logic are out.
This post was edited on 4/2/13 at 11:24 pm
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
100000 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

I think these cocks are just butthurt that each list consistently ranked their fanbase behind ours.


lolwut. Who gives two fricks about Mizzou?
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
26819 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:23 pm to
quote:



I think these cocks are just butthurt that each list consistently ranked their fanbase behind ours. And they're using the fact that we called b.s. on their broad statement to expel some of this angst.




Nah I went to Missouri this one time. I only visited KC once though. If I had to rank the fan bases in that state it'd go..

Chiefs > Royals > Jayhawks > Cards > Mizzou = Rams.

Oh I forgot, I did drop by Mizzou's football stadium once. It's thousands and thousands of seats smaller than ours so our fan base must be at least 15,000 larger than Mizzou's.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22624 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:25 pm to
They don't like "Ole Man Football" in Mizzou
Posted by TlGERBLOOD
South Orange, NJ
Member since Nov 2011
514 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Chiefs > Royals > Jayhawks > Cards > Mizzou = Rams.


Troll attempt 2/10.

I give you two points because you remembered that both the Royals and the Rams exist. Half of us even usually forget that.

ETA: You'll only have more seats than us until 2016. By 2014 we'll hold 78,000. 82-84K in 2016.
This post was edited on 4/2/13 at 11:29 pm
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
26819 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:27 pm to
quote:


I give you two points because you remembered that both the Royals and the Rams exist. Half of us even usually forget that.


I put at least 30 seconds into that troll. The 1st 5 seconds I almost went with a St. Louis cards example but using KC I figured I could throw some Jayhawk love in there.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120023 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

the Rams exist


Been trying to forget.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

You'll only have more seats than us until 2016. By 2014 we'll hold 78,000. 82-84K in 2016.

Why the frick would mizzou need that large a stadium for? That shite will never get sold out.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22624 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:42 pm to
Posted by trickydick12
college station
Member since Sep 2012
1678 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:45 pm to
I'd switch Ole Miss and SCar. I've never seen a Cock fan to this date.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

I've never seen a Cock fan to this date.
You live in Texas?
Posted by TlGERBLOOD
South Orange, NJ
Member since Nov 2011
514 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

quote: You'll only have more seats than us until 2016. By 2014 we'll hold 78,000. 82-84K in 2016. Why the frick would mizzou need that large a stadium for? That shite will never get sold out.


Why not? We sold out every SEC game this year (only Syracuse and SE Louisiana didn't.) There's no sign of that changing, especially considering:

A. All the new seats will be cheap seats, in the upper deck.
&
B. With the Rams leaving town, StL football fans will be more apt to drive 2 hours to see the game.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 4/2/13 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

We sold out every SEC game this year
With the help of Bama and UGA fans. Y'all's fanbase was very excited for the move to the SEC so of course most games were sold out. Once that wears off and you're team still sucks balls, the passion will fade thus the ticket sales will drop.

And who says St. Louis is leaving?
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Chiefs > Royals > Jayhawks > Cards > Mizzou = Rams.
quote:

Chiefs > Royals > Jayhawks > Cards > Mizzou = Rams.


Didn't read this thread. Read this post on the last page and decided the thread is likely filled with just as many uninformed opinions. Anyone who thinks the Cards aren't at the top of that list has no clue. Had you said in KC, than maybe ok minus your attempted troll with kU, but you said "in that state".
Posted by spacecataz
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2010
203 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Doesn't changethefact thatOleMiss is the flagship university of the state.


The flagship of the great state of Mississippi.

Whoopdydamndoo...

Impressive.
Posted by TlGERBLOOD
South Orange, NJ
Member since Nov 2011
514 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 12:08 am to
quote:

With the help of Bama and UGA fans. Y'all's fanbase was very excited for the move to the SEC so of course most games were sold out. Once that wears off and you're team still sucks balls, the passion will fade thus the ticket sales will drop. And who says St. Louis is leaving?


I was at both of the games. Georgia fans showed up much moreso than the Bama fans. Each fanbase though dud have more representation than both Vandy and Kentucky combined. But neither were out of the ordinary for conference opponents. For the most part they were contained to the visitor section.

Nub and Gayhawk fans used to show up in force, taking up the sections to each side of the normal allotment. As I hope Tennessee and Arkansas will when they visit our home.

As far as the Rams are concerned, the StL sports commission refused to make the stadium upgrades described in the Rams lease agreement. Thus they are out of it after either the 2014 or 2015 season. And a company that Stan Kroenke (Rams owner) is a partner in, just got approval to build a stadium in L.A. So, they gone.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
100000 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 12:11 am to
Didn't see very many Mizzou fans in Columbia last year. Must mean they have a small fanbase.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter