Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Question about the Pete Golding hire

Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:33 am
Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
25284 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:33 am
Was that hire the fastest HCing hire by any SEC program?

I mean, if that's your guy then I get it... or was it just a reactionary hire?
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
1650 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:36 am to
Very good hire.
Posted by Mempho
Member since Dec 2021
575 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Was that hire the fastest HCing hire by any SEC program? I mean, if that's your guy then I get it... or was it just a reactionary hire?


Keith pulled Golding to the side weeks ago to prepare for this possibility. That’s why.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
36843 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Was that hire the fastest HCing hire by any SEC program?

I mean, if that's your guy then I get it... or was it just a reactionary hire?


I think so. DeBoer was pretty fast, but not that fast.

Saban retired on Jan 10. Alabama contacted DeBoer that evening to schedule a meeting. They meet and made an offer to DeBoer on Jan 11.

His hire was announced on Jan 12.

So less than 48 hours in a real coaching search. I don't think it's possible to beat the Golding hire. They already knew before Kiffin left IMO.

Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
25284 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Keith pulled Golding to the side weeks ago to prepare for this possibility.


So he knew weeks ago that he had no intentions of letting Lane coach thru the playoffs.
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
7191 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:41 am to
Absolutely reactionary.
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
7191 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:41 am to
And so did Lane.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75636 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:41 am to
100% reactionary. Carter wouldn’t have been talking to Sumrall and Golesh had Pete been the plan all along
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 11:42 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
41998 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Very good hire.


I remember the days when Bama fans were saying "good riddance!"

Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17512 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

So he knew weeks ago that he had no intentions of letting Lane coach thru the playoffs.
If he were to leave, yeah.

Why should OM have let him?
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
18305 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:55 am to
He's going to be an HC that's going to coach a playoff game, something Lane has never done.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103999 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Keith pulled Golding to the side weeks ago to prepare for this possibility.

Absolutely
quote:

So he knew weeks ago that he had no intentions of letting Lane coach thru the playoffs.


Absolutely
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
621 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:08 pm to
It was an immediate move to show confidence and continuity to not get shafted by the cfp committee. I don’t know if it will work but better than not having a named head coach going into selection.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69476 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:13 pm to
they went the cheap route...knew they could pay millions less for a coordinator
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
36843 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:



So he knew weeks ago that he had no intentions of letting Lane coach thru the playoffs.


Allowing Kiffin to stay and coach the playoffs would have been extremely stupid for Ole Miss.

Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
621 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:16 pm to
Why? Other programs are doing it after coaching changes.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
10194 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Why? Other programs are doing it after coaching changes


Because Lane has already shown he was incapable of handling the responsibilities of both jobs.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
36843 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Why? Other programs are doing it after coaching changes.


Because they are going from smaller programs to larger programs where there isn't much to take, nor do they have a reputation for burning down most everything when leaving other jobs.

Ole Miss would have had a guy spending the next month using the playoffs to take Ole Miss resources, talking to the players he wants to transfer daily, while also promoting himself for LSU.

Like it or not, Lane is there for Lane and Lane only.
Posted by Mempho
Member since Dec 2021
575 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

So he knew weeks ago that he had no intentions of letting Lane coach thru the playoffs.


Correct.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter