Started By
Message

re: Precedent - Chambliss & NCAA

Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:30 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51824 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:30 pm to
An Ole Miss grad granted the injunction because Chambliss had the sniffles in 2022.

Even when Ole Miss “wins” they embarrass the frick out of themselves.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Any medical professional to dispute the Plaintiff's claims

his own medical records dispute his claims, as did his testimony
quote:

The person who decided Chambliss wouldn't receive a med redshirt earlier this year.

their attorney is there on behalf of the NCAA. He explained why Chambliss' claim was denied
quote:

The person who was in charge of D2 medical redshirts in 2022

he didn't apply for a DII medical redshirt. Why would they call who was in charge of those for a claim that wasn't submitted?
quote:

Examples of COVID, Mono, and Tonsillitis being rejected by the NCAA previously for a medical redshirt.

Chambliss wasn't applying for a medica redshirt based on getting mono and COVID in 2020

quote:

They walked in with no evidence or witnesses.


No, they didn't. I've explained this twice already in this thread. If you don't want to understand, don't. If you want to keep being ignorant about hopw cases are presented and defended, then you do you.
quote:

It was over before it even began.


No shite
quote:

And the NCAA's attorneys were being considered for contempt of court. I'm not a lawyer, but I would say that's generally a sign you did a shitty job.


Oh jesus fricking christ The judge literally said right before he left the bench "i'll try to get a ruling done today. Y'all don't have to stay, but if you want to hear my ruling read, you'll need to wait." Then the guy starts blabbering about holding them in contempt for not waiting around for his ruling. That was court room theatre at its finest.

Just stop. You very clearly have no idea how litigation actually works
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17960 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Just stop. You very clearly have no idea how litigation actually works
You're right bro.

I'm sure the NCAA will win on appeal. They've really been on a hot streak lately in the courts.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Please tells us you listen to an idiot like Mascano and not the actual testimony in the case. Dear Lord where you got is steaming pile of bull shite is beyond me!

I listened to the entire hearing, bud. I'm sorry if you hate hearing what Chambliss personally testified to
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
54204 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:39 pm to
You don't need to be a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Please produce the transcripts where he stated this!

We will wait…..like a really longtime because it didn’t happen!

yes, all of that happened. The whole hearing is on youtube if you want to go watch it.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

You're right bro.

I know
quote:

I'm sure the NCAA will win on appeal

ignoring this strawman, no i don't think they'll win on appeal. That appeal would also be in front of Mississippi judges. You do realize that's the whole strategy with filing in state court right?
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4702 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

What evidence or witness did the NCAA produce which helped their case? I'm not talking about cross-examination of the plaintiff.
The rule that players can only redshirt once unless they have a valid medical hardship. It's not up to the NCAA to produce evidence to back that up.

Maybe the fact that he practiced all season, that's common sense and medical sense that he wasn't disabled.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17960 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

You do realize that's the whole strategy with filing in state court right?
I do.

It's not Chambliss's fault the NCAA isn't incorporated in a way where everything goes thru a Federal court, or a court in Indiana or Delaware.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 1:49 pm
Posted by olemissfan26
MS
Member since Apr 2012
6933 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Maybe the fact that he practiced all season, that's common sense and medical sense that he wasn't disabled.


So if a player tears an ACL and is a participant in practice in a black jersey non-contact and practices 100% of the year and can even lift weights and run should he not get a medical redshirt?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

It's not Chambliss's fault the NCAA isn't incorporated in a way where everything goes thru a Federal court, or a court in Indiana or Delaware.

I didn't say it was his fault or that it was poor strategy. But pretending that his legal arguments are completely sound and the NCAA is/was unquestionably in the wrong because a yokel in Pittsboro, MS said so is certainly a take.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

So if a player tears an ACL and is a participant in practice in a black jersey non-contact and practices 100% of the year and can even lift weights and run should he not get a medical redshirt?

A player with a torn ACL isn't going to be a full participant in practice and run the scout team like Chambliss did. There's levels to this. Chambliss didn't lose reps or have a modified practice regimen like someone who was rehabbing an injury would. He took meds to manage his symptoms and played through it. He did so for 3 years, in fact.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17960 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

But pretending that his legal arguments are completely sound and the NCAA is/was unquestionably in the wrong because a yokel in Pittsboro, MS said so is certainly a take.
That wasn't my take at all. I said the NCAA presented no evidence at the hearing. Chambliss did.

Maybe by 2027 the NCAA will have some evidence to show the judge in Mississippi.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42291 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Chambliss didn't lose reps or have a modified practice regimen like someone who was rehabbing an injury would. He took meds to manage his symptoms and played through it. He did so for 3 years, in fact.


It is absolutely hilarious to watch people try to actually justify this kangaroo court decision as legitimate.
This is all out of desperation because they know they are fricked.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51824 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

That wasn't my take at all. I said the NCAA presented no evidence at the hearing. Chambliss did.

Maybe by 2027 the NCAA will have some evidence to show the judge in Mississippi.




Imagine believing that it was a lack of evidence is why this injunction was granted.

You’ve spent several pages arguing with a litigator and now this gem. You’ve officially gone full retard.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17960 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:00 pm to
I appreciate your legal opinion but that doesn't mean it is correct.

Half of the attorneys in the world lose their cases.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

I said the NCAA presented no evidence at the hearing. Chambliss did.


You're hopeless if this is your take on the hearing. I personally have tried and won many injunctive relief cases without calling a single witness or introducing a single shred of tangible evidence. I've already explained to you why the NCAA didn't and why it wasn't necessary for them to. You either don't care to learn or simply aren't able to understand it. Their evidence was in the record. Their evidence was the medical records and their guidelines. Their case was "here are our guidelines, and here is what Chambliss' medical records said about his condition. Based on our guidelines, his medical issues do not give rise to an incapacitating injury. The guidelines are agreed to by our members, Ole Miss being one of them. We are simply enforcing our member guidelines." There is no witness to call or additional piece of evidence to introduce that wasn't already in the record or wasn't going to be called by Chambliss.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17960 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:05 pm to
Nice appeal to authority.

The Honorable Judge in B.F.E., Mississippi disagrees with ya.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71751 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

The Honorable Judge in B.F.E., Mississippi disagrees with ya.

wonder why
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
51824 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

The Honorable Judge in B.F.E., Mississippi disagrees with ya.




The Ole Miss grad granted the Ole Miss QB an injunction to continue playing for Ole Miss.

Shocker
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter