Started By
Message
re: Power Rankings : Rank the SEC through Week 11
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:24 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:24 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
5. Kentucky
If we are doing Power rankings, then Kentucky should be 11th or lower, they fricking suck George
0
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:26 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Fair enough. I thought it was power rankings not a standard ranking.
Yea, I feel you there. I think Georgia would win if they play again, but if I were a LSU fan I'd fight that tooth and nail. But Georgia has 1 loss, LSU has 2 losses and I think post-LSU/Georgia that Georgia has been better.
One team beat the other by 20. I know we have 2 loses but Georgia hasn’t gotten to play that monster in Tuscaloosa yet.
Really doesn’t matter tbh. 2nd place, 3rd place, 6th place, who gives a frick.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:40 pm to SummerOfGeorge
1. Alabama
2. UGA
3. Miss State
4-14 who cares
2. UGA
3. Miss State
4-14 who cares
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:43 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I like your ranking, but:
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Missouri
5. Mississippi State
6. Kentucky
7. Texas A&M
8. Auburn
9. Florida
10. South Carolina
11. Ole Miss
12. Tennessee
13. Vanderbilt
14. Arkansas
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Missouri
5. Mississippi State
6. Kentucky
7. Texas A&M
8. Auburn
9. Florida
10. South Carolina
11. Ole Miss
12. Tennessee
13. Vanderbilt
14. Arkansas
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:45 pm to mizslu314
Missouri just lost to #6 at home and had to hold on for dear life against #13. They have wins over #9 and #13. They have losses to #1, #2, #6.
Why exactly would they be #4?
Why exactly would they be #4?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:49 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Missouri just lost to #6
You saw the game, I know you did.
quote:
to hold on for dear life against #13.
They won, no? Not the prettiest game but they won.
They played really well against UGA, actually played as good as anyone really can against bama.
Also, if you follow mizzou you would know our offense is almost nonexistent without Hall, who missed all of our "rough patch". Without him, lock sucks, our offense sucks. Having him back is beyond massive.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:50 pm to mizslu314
quote:
You saw the game, I know you did.
Yea, you lost and didn't have a 1st down almost the entire 2nd half..........did I miss something?
quote:
They won, no? Not the prettiest game but they won.
Yea, and that's good, but you have them at #4.
I think Missouri has been pretty solid and is some bad breaks away from having a really dang good year, but I still need them to win a few more games and at least get to 8-4. The trust level with them is still pretty low.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:51 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Yea, you lost and didn't have a 1st down almost the entire 2nd half..........did I miss something?
Ya, apparently the other half.
Still, we lost the game ourselves. Id take that into account. choosing to not run on 3rd and 2 in that scenario has little to do with power ranking positioning imo
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:53 pm to mizslu314
quote:
You saw the game, I know you did.
quote:
They won, no? Not the prettiest game but they won.
Do you not see how this is a little contradicting?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:53 pm to rockiee
quote:Nope. its not.
Do you not see how this is a little contradicting?
Ill elaborate.
The UK game was lost because of a miscommunication on the play calling when it was 3rd and 2 late in the game. If we run the ball, which we should have, its BALL. GAME. its over. done. finished. Our QB, or whoever it was, decided to be cute. But the game was pretty much over at that point. And this isnt taking into account those weird final two players, which could have its own discussion.
Vandy was a simple, 25 degree game, hard to play in. it was ugly, but it was a win.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:54 pm to rockiee
quote:
Do you not see how this is a little contradicting?
Oh look rockiee is using his fancy logic and reason again.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:55 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Nope.
One you are saying there was more than just the end result and on the other one, you are acting like getting the win was the only thing that mattered.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:55 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Mississippi State
5. Kentucky
6. Missouri
7. Auburn
8. Texas A&M
9. Florida
10. South Carolina
11. Ole Miss
12. Tennessee
13. Vanderbilt
14. Arkansas
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:58 pm to mizslu314
quote:
The UK game was lost because of a miscommunication on the play calling when it was 3rd and 2 late in the game. If we run the ball, which we should have, its BALL. GAME. its over. done. finished. Our QB, or whoever it was, decided to be cute. But the game was pretty much over at that point. And this isnt taking into account those weird final two players, which could have its own discussion.
Ok, but the QB and OC and whoever else called it are still part of your team. So that play happened, the people who called it/executed it still play and coach for Mizzou, and therefore it still exists and can be used as evidence for a team being good or bad. Just because it was dumb or bad doesn't mean it doesn't count. That's silly.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 2:58 pm to rockiee
quote:
One you are saying there was more than just the end result and on the other one,
no shite, the vandy game didnt end with fireworks like UK. Vandy game didnt end with a bunch of bs play by the ref. Stop saying because they were both close, they were the same.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 3:00 pm to diddlydawg7
quote:
Vandy and Tennessee over Ole Miss
I agree but the issue will be resolved over the next two weeks anyway, so it's no big deal.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 3:00 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I understand that. I just think things like that, dont weigh as much on if the team is good or not. it was a fluke, but lets agree that losing the game by a fumble, interception, 99 yard run you name it has a greater impact on if a team if good or not in the final outcome. Make sense?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 3:01 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Vandy was a simple, 25 degree game, hard to play in. it was ugly, but it was a win.
And if I wanted, I could find a Vandy fan with excuses as to why they didn't win.
For example, Arkansas lost to Ole Miss earlier this year. Arkansas' top 3 offensive players all got hurt during the game. We were winning up to that point. I could argue that we would have won if one of those players didn't get hurt but that is part of the game. Almost every team can use those types of arguments in close games.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 3:02 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Stop saying because they were both close, they were the same.
That is not what I'm saying at all.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 3:03 pm to rockiee
quote:
And if I wanted, I could find a Vandy fan with excuses as to why they didn't win.
yep find a vandy fan that said the final play of the game was defensive PI, when it wasnt and actually could have been called an offensive PI. And then, have that vandy fan say that the free play they got from that was also not a push off-.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 3:06 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News