Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/2/13 at 6:47 pm to Daigeaux
At least TAMU got the SEC into TX. The other 3 additions have brought jack and shite.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 6:48 pm to Mohican
quote:
Frankly I'm tired of hearing annually about the coming demise of the SEC and LSU
wishful thinking from some. just like jff being fat and slow now and headed for jail soon.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 6:52 pm to EKG
quote:
Mizzou is a great school with even better peeps
Well since I have no clue when lsu
might play mizzou, it doesn't even feel like they're in the league.
aTm and mizzou are both good schools, but the whole expansion was done half-aased with no clear goals and plans. It's messed up an incredible setup, and that's why I hate it.
LSU hasn't played vandy since 2009 and they aren't on the schedule for 14. We now have 2 conferences with a cross conference scheduling arangement instead of having 1 conference.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 6:56 pm to CrippleCreek
I can understand that. There were schools in the B12 North we rarely saw either.
Hate to say it, but it's only going to get worse. Gone are the days of mini leagues; here to stay are the days of ever-growing mega-conferences.
Hate to say it, but it's only going to get worse. Gone are the days of mini leagues; here to stay are the days of ever-growing mega-conferences.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:03 pm to CrippleCreek
quote:
aTm and mizzou are both good schools, but the whole expansion was done half-aased with no clear goals and plans. It's messed up an incredible setup, and that's why I hate it. LSU hasn't played vandy since 2009 and they aren't on the schedule for 14. We now have 2 conferences with a cross conference scheduling arangement instead of having 1 conference.
Your'e making A&M an excuse why you can't play Vandy?
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:03 pm to Palooza11
quote:
I mean what were you SEC Big 6 oracles thinking? Arkansas joined the SEC in 1992 and and it took them 19 years to win 11 games in the conference. We did it in one.
When the pig dicksuckers joined there were only 11 games played a year ... same goes goes for the psychotic fighting red jungle fowls.
You do understand the difference do you not *aggie?
Pete Thamel has something in common with you *aggies. Y'all both like it dry up in the ponderosa while doing bath salts.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:10 pm to EKG
quote:
Mizzou is a great school with even better peeps. They were a top-notch get for the SEC. And they'll compete in most sports, sooner rather than later.
Yeah I really don't mind Mizzou as long a they step it up in Basketball and keep their academics up they're fine. I won't a strong SEC that will increases Auburns NCAA tourney seeding once Bruce Pearl is our HC
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:11 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
You know I hate lsu- with a passion! Frick em!
Ahh then carry on
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:17 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
The other 3 additions have brought jack and shite.
Are we still on this
See what you have to look forward to Mizzou?
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:17 pm to blacknblu
quote:
See what you have to look forward to Mizzou?
We expected it when we joined the conference that was still fighting the civil war, they have a hell of a memory and a desire for times past.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:19 pm to undecided
Bring back power houses Suwanee, Georgia Tech and Tulane.
Kick out those weaklings A&M, Missouri, Arkansas and USCe.
That will certainly bring back the greatness of the SEC. I can see it now...Alabama and the 8 dwarfs. (and Dopey, we all know who you are. Here eat some more turf.)
Commissioner F'baum do your duty.
Kick out those weaklings A&M, Missouri, Arkansas and USCe.
That will certainly bring back the greatness of the SEC. I can see it now...Alabama and the 8 dwarfs. (and Dopey, we all know who you are. Here eat some more turf.)
Commissioner F'baum do your duty.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:20 pm to undecided
To some extent this is true. It changed our identity and A&M is currently fulfilling every SEC-hater's dream by giving them fodder at every turn.
Mizzou, OTOH, is slowly but surely acclimating. Most of them seem to get the SEC attitude that you don't as a program make an arse of yourself in public/on a national stage -- even if you're violating NCAA rules making an arse of yourself is often (though not always) the worst offense, especially when you do so continuously. This despite us all, myself included, thinking A&M would make a better fit has proven it just ain't true - they're Texans not southerners and they're showing it.
A&M needs to get with the program. Because despite their first year 'glory' Mizzou looks like a better addition with every turn of the A&M screw.
I'm slowly coming to concede the fact that while Mizzou only have parts of the state that are southern in nature, the southern influence that provides as well as the influence they had in their past has shaped their cultural identity on this front.(Now please Mizzou don't start acting like A&M if you happen to win a few games).
ETA: Of course, fans can be as assholish as they want to be online. This is about how a program ought to behave.
Mizzou, OTOH, is slowly but surely acclimating. Most of them seem to get the SEC attitude that you don't as a program make an arse of yourself in public/on a national stage -- even if you're violating NCAA rules making an arse of yourself is often (though not always) the worst offense, especially when you do so continuously. This despite us all, myself included, thinking A&M would make a better fit has proven it just ain't true - they're Texans not southerners and they're showing it.
A&M needs to get with the program. Because despite their first year 'glory' Mizzou looks like a better addition with every turn of the A&M screw.
I'm slowly coming to concede the fact that while Mizzou only have parts of the state that are southern in nature, the southern influence that provides as well as the influence they had in their past has shaped their cultural identity on this front.(Now please Mizzou don't start acting like A&M if you happen to win a few games).
ETA: Of course, fans can be as assholish as they want to be online. This is about how a program ought to behave.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:22 pm to blacknblu
quote:
Are we still on this
See what you have to look forward to Mizzou?
Doesn't make what I said any less true.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:29 pm to retro_era
Congrats on completely missing the point.
You people just don't get it, and that's the problem.
You people just don't get it, and that's the problem.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:29 pm to undecided
Kick out any two of Vandy, UK or MSU. TAMU and Mizzou are way more legit than those teams.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:33 pm to GumpMaster&Commander
quote:
Kick out any two of Vandy, UK or MSU. TAMU and Mizzou are way more legit than those teams.
You really don't get how this loyalty thing works do you?
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:34 pm to Prof
Good lord
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:36 pm to Prof
quote:
You really don't get how this loyalty thing works do you?
The point still stands. TAMU and Mizzou would not be the first to go if the SEC downsized. TAMU would be one of the least likely candidates. Mizzou is better than a few other SEC programs.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 7:38 pm to GumpMaster&Commander
Get the hell out with your logic
Page 6 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News