Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2353
Registered on:4/24/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Nico doesn’t want to give Luka the super max based on concerns over how he’d age regardless of his fitness, compounded by concerns over his durability and conditioning.

With those concerns, hard to imagine Luka staying in shape if he wasn’t happy, and possible it turns 2025 into a total wash.

Then he demands out over the summer if you’re not going to give him the full max, and you never get a player the quality of AD in that scenario.

So you just do it now. I guess that would be the logic?
OKC was founded on a deal of fortune 6 years ago that, like this deal for the Mavs and unlike the other deals people are talking about, has an actual basketball player as the cornerstone of the return.
I am pissed they traded him at all.

However, I would be much more upset if, as a mavs fan, they traded an all-nba homegrown talent for a big box of hopium on a spreadsheet. I’m a little surprised they couldn’t pry the other trade-able first off the Lakers though.

Have any of those “massive trade returns” everyone is pumping as the alternative ever amounted to any actual winning other than the Celtics?

I’m not infatuated with it, but at least the basketball on the court will still be good.

And there has to be another trade, because I don’t believe you can actually plan to play one of the centers with AD and PJ for huge minutes unless they’re ready for Lively to actually become a corner 3 pt threat.

re: CJ Daniels to the Portal

Posted by CrippleCreek on 12/3/24 at 12:49 pm
A guy like him almost has to enter the portal every year. He’s a good college player, probably an NFL camp body. He can’t waste any of his limited football earning potential only negotiating with one team on compensation.

Hope he comes back, but replaceable if he doesn’t.
It’s an optics loss more than an on-field loss, most likely.

The list of QBs like Maye, Young, Stroud and Williams won a grand total of nothing in College. And then there’s the group that didn’t pan out at all.

The most likely scenario is probably that Underwood pops next year, is elite by year 3, and doesn’t win a national title before being a first round pick.

Wonderful for him, clearly not a bust, but not really something that raises the program’s level or profile.

Just look at Raiola and Lagway. You cant expect much more than that in year 1, and then you’re already a third of the way through his time in college.

Since Lawrence in 2018, no underclassman has won a title, while multiple have been won by transfers. That trend doesn’t look to break in 2024.
Kicking FGs at the edge of your kicker’s range is bad process, even if it works. Last week he made them and it left Ark in the game until the Weeks INT. This week missing left aTm in the game until LSU made the critical mistakes.
The two missed FG would have been Ramos career long. A month ago we wouldn’t have even attempted those because there was no trust in the defense. The decision to kick at least two, and possibly all 3, was dicey at best.

Those series needed to be called from a presumption of 4th down territory.
Reticence to get appropriately in the muck of SEC style recruiting is the problem with Campbell, if rumors are to be believed.

Nobody who does it the “right way”, or thinks there is a “right way” can really be a serious candidate for a top level SEC job. If you aren’t enthusiastic about bringing all of the available resources to bear on the problem of recruiting and roster building, you’re just not going to succeed.
Losing Bama, Florida and Auburn would be the hardest of NOs from me, and I think most LSU fans.

The ones posting here just know they don’t get a vote and keeping the melt going is more fun than bitching about something we have no control over.

If for some reason there aren’t pods and LSU ends up in the SWC I’ll need a new hobby.
quote:

Right now Bama, Clemson, OU and OSU are essentially penciled in every year. The recruits know this obviously and that plays into their decision on which school to "take their talents" to.


People always cite this as the problem, but it has very little to do with the playoff only being 4 teams. The problem is the PAC currently stinks and nobody is competing with OSU, Clemson and OU in their respective conferences.

Mix up the champs within those leagues, and variety of the type you actually want (different helmets with an actual shot at winning) all of a sudden takes care of itself.

That problem doesn’t get solved by expanding. The blue bloods and other programs with legit resources in those leagues stepping up and getting their act together solves that problem.

Bama is a whole separate issue, because they don’t actually win the SEC every year, but get in half the time they don’t anyway.
The 9-10 seeds fading way way back in the standings has really ramped up with the flattening of the lottery odds, and this helps avoid that a bit.

One of the first years of the flattened odds the Mavericks traded everybody with a pulse other than Doncic to tank a .500 team at the deadline. They’d be less incentivized to do that now.

Both the good and bad teams have been trying to game the standings at the end of the season for matchups and lottery balls for what feels like a more protracted period every year. Getting rid of that even a little with the play-in is a good thing.
I think it’s more likely, based on what we did see, that the lie is that they were only given a 5 minute head start on day 2.

I think they got the real time differential. Otherwise they should have been able to show them in-frame with everybody else at some point on day 2, right?
Unless they gave the group a horrible edit, it looked like CT skated because the group with an iron-clad grip on the game were dumb as bricks, and CT won what, 3?, eliminations.

Other than the double elimination; which didn’t even work out because Devin lost anyway, I didn’t feel like there was much meddling. The rogue setup kinda prevented too much intervention anyway.

Having Big T most of the season was also perfect for CT because the whole group running the game, who were horrible strategists, thought he was neutralized in a final by her and never really gave too much consideration to the possibility he gets to switch at some point.

Comparing these teams is as difficult and hypothetical as comparing 2019 LSU to a team from the 70s. The sport was not the same.

Alabama’s season was one of the most unbelievable organizational accomplishments of all time. How they stack up on a football field, who knows. Practice, preparation, and competition are completely different between the two seasons.

Nobody else managed to even get into the zip code of normalizing for COVID and Alabama looked normal. It’s unbelievable, but that doesn’t mean they’d be able to hang in a theoretical game with a team that had normal offseason, season, practice and competition.
There is no middle in any conference because of the schedules.

A 4-4 sec team is normally 8-4, ranked, and propping up the strength of record for the top teams. That team is 4-6 and sucks this season.

Even LSUs dumpster fire year would have a good shot at 7-5 and looking plain down, rather than disaster, in a normal year.

That the committee is so short sighted that they’re gonna force convention onto this top 4 instead of tossing a Cincy or Coastal in there so we can have a little fun is a damn shame.
Based on what they said about yesterday’s testing/case reporting anomaly, the numbers are falling off a cliff if they’ve captured all of the cases for a 4 day period in the last 3 reports.

Very few people could get tickets to the Texas or Bama games. There wasn’t a big neutral site trip this year.

LSU hasn’t made this game since 2011, and the conference championship still matters.

There are going to be a ton of LSU people going to this game. Neither (still not official) participant has allocated its tickets to season ticket holders.

Once that’s done the secondary market will pick up.

The return trip to the peach bowl if LSU were fortunate enough to end up there with the NCG in New Orleans is the one I’d expect a softer market for.

re: Crazy stat re: Joe Burrow

Posted by CrippleCreek on 9/17/18 at 10:53 am
The stats v. eye test just shows me that the scheme isn’t very QB friendly still.

He definitely can and must improve his completion percentage, but I think it is a bit unreasonable to expect 60+ with what they’re running and the throws he is making.

He starts putting up those numbers, and LSU is going to be blowing people’s doors off.
I’d bet on it being the chain of custody information referenced in reports that has gotten very little play compared to the equity of the length of the suspension.

It could allow the ncaa to overturn the suspension on a technical issue without dealing with changing any actual rules.

That information has been a footnote in most of the reports I’ve read, but always seemed to be the most promising path towards reinstatement to me.
That people really believe Ed gives a single solitary frick about LSU is just mind-boggling.

He spun a yarn to get a job he had no business getting.

O is a disaster in general, but his bullshite dream job narrative is by far the worst part. He’s nothing but a snake-oil salesman and a liar.