Started By
Message
re: Pac 12 coaches saying the SEC should play 9 games...
Posted on 5/1/14 at 5:16 pm to tccdc
Posted on 5/1/14 at 5:16 pm to tccdc
At least he knows which SEC teams are important and which teams are not
quote:
There's no taking away anything that LSU and Alabama and Auburn recently have accomplished. They've been phenomenal. My take is to say, 'OK, the rest of us are playing our conference. We're playing nine out of 12 teams in our conference. Why can't you do the same thing?
1
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:10 pm to auburnphan23
Lets look at conference expansions for both the Pac-12 and the SEC a few years ago.
PAC-12 additions records since joining the league:
Colorado 5-19 (2-16)
Utah 10-14 (5-13)
SEC additions records since joining the league:
Texas A&M 20-6 (10-6)
Missouri 17-9 (9-7)
Enough said
PAC-12 additions records since joining the league:
Colorado 5-19 (2-16)
Utah 10-14 (5-13)
SEC additions records since joining the league:
Texas A&M 20-6 (10-6)
Missouri 17-9 (9-7)
Enough said
This post was edited on 5/2/14 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:12 pm to tccdc
And they are right.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:14 pm to tccdc
Their nine game conference schedule equals a three game SEC schedule bunch of shaved cooters. 
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:30 pm to wartiger2004
USC, Stanford, and Oregon are all playing 9 conference games along with big OOC games. USC is continuing their rivalry with Notre Dame in the future as well. I just don't understand why we can't do the same. It's the best way to keep rivalries and travel to other SEC schools. Especially with the new College Football Playoff in place that won't hurt SEC teams for having an extra loss potentially. There will always be at least one SEC team in the playoff and I think being the best conference is not an excuse to only play 8 conference games.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News