Started By
Message
re: Pac 10 Conference is not weak
Posted on 9/12/08 at 9:36 am to SECBengal
Posted on 9/12/08 at 9:36 am to SECBengal
The Pac-10 is not a weak conference. I am going to say something here that I hope someone on your board doesn't see me writing.
The SEC is the best conference in college football. They are the conference most other conferences would like to be.
This being said, I do think the Big 12 this year is the second best conference in football.
When you get down to third and fourth, it gets a bit tricky, Pac 10 or big 10. At this point, you are talking about the third and fourth best conference, so who really cares?
As far as the worst conference in the BCS, well that likewise is a difficult question to answer. BE or ACC? I gotta say the BE is the worst, but maybe that is because I hate the BE so much.
So my conference rankings would be
1. SEC
2. Big 12
3. Who cares?
4. Who cares?
5. ACC (don't worry, you are not the worst)
6. BE
And as far as best team in the country goes, I am sorry, but I get sucked up every year in the immense talent that USC has and have to give it to them.
But USC often times is a paper tiger, and we all know where the real tiger is! Aubur..... I mean Clem.... Oh come on, its LSU
The SEC is the best conference in college football. They are the conference most other conferences would like to be.
This being said, I do think the Big 12 this year is the second best conference in football.
When you get down to third and fourth, it gets a bit tricky, Pac 10 or big 10. At this point, you are talking about the third and fourth best conference, so who really cares?
As far as the worst conference in the BCS, well that likewise is a difficult question to answer. BE or ACC? I gotta say the BE is the worst, but maybe that is because I hate the BE so much.
So my conference rankings would be
1. SEC
2. Big 12
3. Who cares?
4. Who cares?
5. ACC (don't worry, you are not the worst)
6. BE
And as far as best team in the country goes, I am sorry, but I get sucked up every year in the immense talent that USC has and have to give it to them.
But USC often times is a paper tiger, and we all know where the real tiger is! Aubur..... I mean Clem.... Oh come on, its LSU
1
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:10 am to Doc Fenton
quote:
Vanilla Bear MD) USC is an old school that sits on the corner of the west coast with no real Major competition in it's area.
That's pretty rantarded. Not only is there another BCS school IN THE SAME CITY, there are THREE other BCS, In-Conference opponents in the same state. ASU and UA are an easy day's drive as well.
quote:
As much as i like him and have hopes for his play now, Reggie Bush would not have ran all over SEC teams.
This post was edited on 9/12/08 at 11:53 am
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:32 am to thetempleowl
PAC isn't weak at all... they are looking pretty good so far this year (granted it's like 1 or 2 games played per team so far)
I don't see it if someone argues the pac is any worse than the third best conference in college football... and depending on how things shake out they could certainly be better
I don't see it if someone argues the pac is any worse than the third best conference in college football... and depending on how things shake out they could certainly be better
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:39 am to BigLSUNut
quote:
Florida over Southern Cal
Georgia over Oregon
LSU over Arizona St.
I'm with you so far...
quote:
Washington over Alabama
Whoa! That would be a significant upset, IMO.
quote:
Auburn over California
Arizona over S. Carolina
Oregon St. over Vanderbilt
Stanford over Mississippi St.
UCLA over Arkansas
Mississippi over Washington St.
I'd agree on these except for Arizona over South Carolina. The Cocks would take 'em.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:40 am to BigLSUNut
Where are the board police when you need them? What is the fascination with the PAC-10?
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:47 am to ToesOnTheNose213
quote:
FOUR BCS and Conference opponents in the same state
UCLA
Cal
Stanford
????
There are other FCS teams in California, but not BCS teams. Fresno State, San Diego State and San Jose State bring the total number of FCS teams in California (including USC) to seven, right? In a state of, what, 35 million people? Louisiana has five in a state of four million. It should be easy to see why some of us view USC as having little or no competition.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 11:51 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
????
Oops, part of my message was erased. I meant 4 total BCS schools (including USC) and 3 BCS in-conference opponents. Don't know what happened there, my bad.
quote:
In a state of, what, 35 million people? It should be easy to see why some of us view USC as having little or no competition.
But if you take out all the illegal immigrants, that number is more like 20 mill.
I fixed my previous post. Good lookin' out.
This post was edited on 9/12/08 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:44 pm to JohnLSU
quote:
SEC 10-2 against Pac10
I think you mean the PAC-10 leads as of late in real life.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:46 pm to Vanilla Bear MD
quote:
i would love to see how badly they do compared to their cupcake conference.
Yet the teams they play on that "cupcake" schedule keeps beating up on the SEC like a red-headed step-child.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:48 pm to wilfont
quote:
It has one quality team. One.
And teams from the "other nine" beat up on SEC opponents more often than not this decade.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:48 pm to BigLSUNut
you're nuts if you think Washington would beat bama. I want bama to fail as much as the next LSU fan...but that's just nuts.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:49 pm to SECBengal
quote:
Year in and Year out the PAC-10 would get my vote as being the second weakest BCS conference behind the Big East.
I wonder what they says about the SEC? Because this second weakest conference poiunds the much more than half the time as of late.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 2:55 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
...as of late
please try to not be so specific in future posts.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 3:28 pm to CanShakersDecayedNut
quote:
please try to not be so specific in future posts.
Last 18 games...this century. Most here know the record and offer no rational excuses.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 3:47 pm to BigLSUNut
Florida over Southern Cal
Georgia over Oregon
LSU over Arizona St.
Washington over Alabama Seriously?
Auburn over California
Arizona over S. Carolina Right!
Oregon St. over Vanderbilt Toss Up
Stanford over Mississippi St.
UCLA over Arkansas
Mississippi over Washington St.
Not sure where this list came from but if 0-2 Washington soon to be 0-3 Washington is the 4th best team in the PAC 10, then the PAC 10 really sucks.
Georgia over Oregon
LSU over Arizona St.
Washington over Alabama Seriously?
Auburn over California
Arizona over S. Carolina Right!
Oregon St. over Vanderbilt Toss Up
Stanford over Mississippi St.
UCLA over Arkansas
Mississippi over Washington St.
Not sure where this list came from but if 0-2 Washington soon to be 0-3 Washington is the 4th best team in the PAC 10, then the PAC 10 really sucks.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 4:01 pm to LSUTANGERINE
did you actually have numbers you were looking to share? or were you just talking out your arse?
Posted on 9/12/08 at 4:12 pm to CanShakersDecayedNut
quote:11-7 in the last 18 or something like that. Many ranters have posted it here.
did you actually have numbers you were looking to share? or were you just talking out your arse?
Posted on 9/12/08 at 4:45 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:Think it's 10-6 in the last 16 but not that much different from what you posted. Shocker to many SEC fans though, I'd bet.
11-7 in the last 18 or something like that. Many ranters have posted it here.
Posted on 9/12/08 at 5:02 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Last 18 games...this century.
There have been 16 games this century and yes the record is 10-6 in favor of the PAC but they have not been poundings as you put it other than by USC, the poundings have been by the SEC in their wins, but then again your terminalogy of a blowout win is if the score is at least 7 pts...
Posted on 9/12/08 at 5:49 pm to Vanilla Bear MD
quote:
hey, the truth is the truth.
I hope you're not really a doctor, because you are an idiot.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News